Co-design and ethical artificial intelligence for health: An agenda for critical research and practice

被引:37
作者
Donia, Joseph [1 ]
Shaw, James A. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, Inst Hlth Policy Management & Evaluat, 155 Coll St, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Joint Ctr Bioeth, Dalla Lana Sch Publ Hlth, Toronto, ON, Canada
[3] Womens Coll Hosp, Inst Hlth Syst Solut & Virtual Care, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
Co-design; participatory design; artificial intelligence; health care; design ethics; data ethics; PARTICIPATORY DESIGN; PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT; DIGITAL HEALTH; BIG DATA; PATIENT; CARE; VALUES; ALGORITHMS; ENGAGEMENT; FICTION;
D O I
10.1177/20539517211065248
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Applications of artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML) in health care are dynamic and rapidly growing. One strategy for anticipating and addressing ethical challenges related to AI/ML for health care is patient and public involvement in the design of those technologies - often referred to as 'co-design'. Co-design has a diverse intellectual and practical history, however, and has been conceptualized in many different ways. Moreover, AI/ML introduces challenges to co-design that are often underappreciated. Informed by perspectives from critical data studies and critical digital health studies, we review the research literature on involvement in health care, and involvement in design, and examine the extent to which co-design as commonly conceptualized is capable of addressing the range of normative issues raised by AI/ML for health care. We suggest that AI/ML technologies have amplified and modified existing challenges related to patient and public involvement, and created entirely new challenges. We outline three pitfalls associated with co-design for ethical AI/ML for health care and conclude with suggestions for addressing these practical and conceptual challenges.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 127 条
[1]  
Abelson J., 2010, Effective strategies for interactive public engagement in the development of healthcare policies and programs
[2]  
Abelson Julia, 2004, J Health Serv Res Policy, V9, P205, DOI 10.1258/1355819042250203
[3]   Designing for human rights in AI [J].
Aizenberg, Evgeni ;
van den Hoven, Jeroen .
BIG DATA & SOCIETY, 2020, 7 (02)
[4]   Toward an Ethics of Algorithms: Convening, Observation, Probability, and Timeliness [J].
Ananny, Mike .
SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES, 2016, 41 (01) :93-117
[5]   Participation as a matter of concern in participatory design [J].
Andersen, Lars Bo ;
Danholt, Peter ;
Halskov, Kim ;
Hansen, Nicolai Brodersen ;
Lauritsen, Peter .
CODESIGN-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COCREATION IN DESIGN AND THE ARTS, 2015, 11 (3-4) :250-261
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2014, SOC SPACE
[7]  
Ansari Ahmed, 2019, XRDS: Crossroads, The ACM Magazine for Students, V26, P16, DOI DOI 10.1145/3368048
[8]  
Asaro P.M., 2000, Accounting, Management and Information Technologies, V10, P257, DOI [DOI 10.1016/S0959-8022(00)00004-7, 10.1016/S0959-8022(00)00004-7]
[9]   Artificial Intelligence, Intersectionality, and the Future of Public Health [J].
Bauer, Greta R. ;
Lizotte, Daniel J. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 2021, 111 (01) :98-100
[10]   Diversity in everyday discourse: The cultural ambiguities and consequences of "Happy Talk" [J].
Bell, Joyce M. ;
Hartmann, Douglas .
AMERICAN SOCIOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2007, 72 (06) :895-914