Open versus endovascular aneurysm repair trial review

被引：12
|
作者：
Weinkauf, Craig [1 ]
George, Elizabeth [2 ]
Zhou, Wei [1 ]
机构：
[1] Univ Arizona, Dept Surg, Div Vasc Surg, 1501 N Campbell Ave, Tucson, AZ 85724 USA
[2] Stanford Univ, Dept Surg, Div Vasc Surg, Stanford, CA USA
来源：
SURGERY | 2017年 / 162卷 / 05期
关键词：
ABDOMINAL AORTIC-ANEURYSM; VETERANS AFFAIRS OPEN; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; RANDOMIZED-TRIAL; OUTCOMES; PREDICTORS; MORTALITY; GENDER;
D O I：
10.1016/j.surg.2017.04.009
中图分类号：
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号：
摘要：
The Open versus Endovascular Aneurysm Repair trial is the only randomized controlled trial that is funded by the federal government to evaluate the treatment outcomes of infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms. Since the initial publication, multiple post-hoc analyses have become available. This review summarizes these data, focusing on the primary outcome measures (ie, overall survival) and several key secondary outcomes including aneurysm-related death, age consideration, secondary procedures, and endoleaks. Cost-effectiveness of each treatment modality and the limitations of OVER trial also are discussed critically in this review.
引用
收藏
页码：974 / 978
页数：5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Endovascular versus open repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm: EVAR trial 1
    Claire Braybrook
    Nature Clinical Practice Cardiovascular Medicine, 2005, 2 (9): : 435 - 436
  • [2] A systematic review of open repair versus fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair of juxtarenal aneurysms
    Rao, R.
    Lane, T.
    Franklin, I.
    Davies, A. H.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 101 : 39 - 39
  • [3] Endovascular aneurysm repair versus open repair in patients with abdominal aortic aneurysm (EVAR trial 1): randomised controlled trial
    Greenhalgh, RM
    Brown, LC
    Epstein, D
    Kwong, GPS
    Powell, JT
    Sculpher, MJ
    Thompson, SG
    LANCET, 2005, 365 (9478): : 2179 - 2186
  • [4] Open versus Endovascular Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
    Lederle, Frank A.
    Kyriakides, Tassos C.
    Stroupe, Kevin T.
    Freischlag, Julie A.
    Padberg, Frank T., Jr.
    Matsumura, Jon S.
    Huo, Zhiping
    Johnson, Gary R.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2019, 380 (22): : 2126 - 2135
  • [5] Abdominal aortic aneurysm - Open versus endovascular repair
    Lederle, FA
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2004, 351 (16): : 1677 - 1679
  • [6] Endovascular versus Open Repair of Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm
    Greenhalgh, Roger M.
    Brown, Louise C.
    Powell, Janet T.
    Thompson, Simon G.
    Epstein, David
    Sculpher, Mark J.
    NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2010, 362 (20): : 1863 - 1871
  • [7] Randomized multicenter trial on percutaneous versus open access in endovascular aneurysm repair (PiERO)
    Vierhout, Bastiaan P.
    Pol, Robert A.
    Ott, M. Alewijn
    Pierie, Maurice E. N.
    de Kempenaer, Ties M. G. van Andringa
    Hissink, Rutger J.
    Wikkeling, O. R. Marald
    Bottema, Jan T.
    el Moumni, Mostafa
    Zeebregts, Clark J.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2019, 69 (05) : 1429 - 1436
  • [8] Juxtarenal Aortic Aneurysm: Are We Ready for a Randomised Trial on Open versus Endovascular Repair?
    Lepidi, Sandro
    Squizzato, Francesco
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF VASCULAR AND ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY, 2020, 59 (01) : 50 - 50
  • [9] Differences in readmissions after open repair versus endovascular aneurysm repair
    Casey, Kevin
    Hernandez-Boussard, Tina
    Mell, Matthew W.
    Lee, Jason T.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2013, 57 (01) : 89 - 95
  • [10] Open repair versus fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair of juxtarenal aneurysms
    Rao, Rohini
    Lane, Tristan R. A.
    Franklin, Ian J.
    Davies, Alun H.
    JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2015, 61 (01) : 242 - U591
12345