Most pancreatic cancer resections are R1 resections

被引:503
作者
Esposito, Irene [2 ]
Kleff, Joerg [1 ]
Bergmann, Frank [2 ]
Reiser, Caroline [1 ]
Herpel, Esther [2 ]
Friess, Helmut [1 ]
Schirmacher, Peter [2 ]
Buechler, Markus W. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Heidelberg, Dept Gen Surg, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
[2] Univ Heidelberg, Inst Pathol, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany
关键词
pancreatic cancer; margins; local recurrence; survival; pathology reporting;
D O I
10.1245/s10434-008-9839-8
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Curative resection has been shown to be one of the key factors influencing survival of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients. Although general guidelines for the processing of pancreatic specimens have been established, there is currently no widely accepted standardized protocol for pathological examination, especially with respect to resection margins. Methods: Here we present a single-center experience with 111 consecutive macroscopic complete pancreatic head resections for PDAC carried out between 2005 and 2006 by using standardized pathological processing and reporting. The pancreatic transection margin, as well as the bile duct and stomach/duodenum margins and the circumferential soft tissue margins (medial, anterior surface, superior, and posterior), were inked and analyzed. R1 was defined as a distance of the tumor from the resection margin of <= 1 mm. Results: One hundred eighty-eight consecutive macroscopic complete pancreatic head resections carried out for PDAC without a standardized protocol between 2002 and 2004 were used as a control group. The R1 rate for resections carried out with the standardized protocol was 76%. The medial (68%) and the posterior (47%) margins were most commonly involved, and in 32% of the cases, more than one margin was affected. The R1 resection rate in the period without standardized pathological reporting was 14%. Conclusions: This study highlights the importance of pathological reporting and suggests that tumor growth patterns and thorough examination but not surgical technique determine R1 resection rates in PDAC.
引用
收藏
页码:1651 / 1660
页数:10
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] ALLEMA JH, 1995, CANCER, V75, P2069, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19950415)75:8<2069::AID-CNCR2820750807>3.0.CO
  • [2] 2-7
  • [3] Autschbach F, 2005, RECENT RES CANCER, V165, P30, DOI 10.1007/3-540-27449-9_5
  • [4] A systematic review and meta-analysis of pylorus-preserving versus classical pancreaticoduodenectomy for surgical treatment of periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma
    Diener, Markus K.
    Knaebel, Hanns-Peter
    Heukaufer, Christina
    Antes, Gerd
    Buechler, Markus W.
    Seiler, Christoph M.
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2007, 245 (02) : 187 - 200
  • [5] Greene FL., 2002, AJCC CANC STAGING HD, V6th
  • [6] Patterns of recurrence after curative resection of pancreatic cancer, based on autopsy findings
    Hishinuma, S
    Ogata, Y
    Tomikawa, M
    Ozawa, I
    Hirabayashi, K
    Igarashi, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2006, 10 (04) : 511 - 518
  • [7] A margin-negative R0 resection accomplished with minimal postoperative complications is the surgeon's contribution to long-term survival in pancreatic cancer
    Howard, Thomas J.
    Krug, Joseph E.
    Yu, Jian
    Zyromski, Nick J.
    Schmidt, C. Max
    Jacobson, Lewis E.
    Madura, James A.
    Wiebke, Eric A.
    Lillemoe, Keith D.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2006, 10 (10) : 1338 - 1345
  • [8] Japan Pancreas Society, 2003, Classification of pancreatic carcinoma
  • [9] Favourable prognostic factors in a large UK experience of adenocarcinoma of the head of the pancreas and periampullary region
    Jarufe, NP
    Coldham, C
    Mayer, AD
    Mirza, DF
    Buckels, JAC
    Bramhall, SR
    [J]. DIGESTIVE SURGERY, 2004, 21 (03) : 202 - 209
  • [10] Cancer statistics, 2007
    Jemal, Ahmedin
    Siegel, Rebecca
    Ward, Elizabeth
    Murray, Taylor
    Xu, Jiaquan
    Thun, Michael J.
    [J]. CA-A CANCER JOURNAL FOR CLINICIANS, 2007, 57 (01) : 43 - 66