Evaluating construction land use efficiency under carbon emission constraints: A comparative study of China and the USA

被引:15
作者
Wang, Ying [1 ,2 ]
Chai, Ji [1 ,2 ]
Zhang, Hongwei [1 ,2 ]
Yang, Bin [3 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Geosci, Sch Publ Adm, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
[2] Minist Nat Resources, Key Lab Rule Law Res, Wuhan 430074, Peoples R China
[3] China Univ Min & Technol, Sch Publ Policy & Management, Xuzhou 221008, Jiangsu, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Construction land use efficiency; Carbon emission; Abatement potential; China; The United States; Sustainable land management; URBAN; EXPANSION; URBANIZATION; PATTERNS; BIODIVERSITY; ALLOCATION; ABATEMENT; DYNAMICS; IMPACTS; COSTS;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-022-19475-6
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Research on construction land use efficiency with carbon emissions provides valuable insights for effective regulation of land use planning and low-carbon development. This study explores construction land use efficiency (CLUE) in China and the USA by employing a slack-based measure (SBM) that incorporates carbon emissions as undesirable output to evaluate CLUE at the provincial/state level. The abatement potential (AP) of construction land use and carbon emissions through the land utilization process are further explored. We find (1) that the average CLUE in China (0.512) is relatively higher than that in the USA, but the CLUE in both countries is at a relatively low level; (2) that carbon emissions, as undesirable output, have a negative impact on CLUE; and (3) that the average AP for construction land is 0.485 in China and 0.696 in the USA, while the average AP for carbon emissions is 0.500 in China and 0.576 in the USA. Understanding these characteristics can lead to better coordination of emissions reduction policies and land use policies to optimize the construction land inputs in both countries, thereby sustaining land use management while reducing carbon emission.
引用
收藏
页码:49998 / 50009
页数:12
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
Alig R., 2010, AREA CHANGES US FORE
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2015, FCCCCP2015L9REV1 UN
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2010, Census regions and divisions of the United States
[4]   Realizing China's urban dream [J].
Bai, Xuemei ;
Shi, Peijun ;
Liu, Yansui .
NATURE, 2014, 509 (7499) :158-160
[5]   Land cover transitions in the United States South: 2007-2013 [J].
Bettinger, Pete ;
Merry, Krista .
APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2019, 105 :102-110
[6]  
Bigelow D.P., 2012, Major uses of land in the United States, 2012, EIB-178
[7]   Urban mobility and urban form: the social and environmental costs of different patterns of urban expansion [J].
Camagni, R ;
Gibelli, MC ;
Rigamonti, P .
ECOLOGICAL ECONOMICS, 2002, 40 (02) :199-216
[8]   Environmental efficiency analysis and estimation of CO2 abatement costs in dairy cattle farms in Umbria (Italy): A SBM-DEA model with undesirable output [J].
Cecchini, Lucio ;
Venanzi, Sonia ;
Pierri, Antonio ;
Chiorri, Massimo .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 197 :895-907
[9]   Urban land expansion and the transitional mechanisms in Nanjing, China [J].
Chen, Jianglong ;
Gao, Jinlong ;
Chen, Wen .
HABITAT INTERNATIONAL, 2016, 53 :274-283
[10]   Exploring the industrial land use efficiency of China's resource-based cities [J].
Chen, Wei ;
Chen, Wenjun ;
Ning, Siyin ;
Liu, Er-na ;
Zhou, Xue ;
Wang, Yanan ;
Zhao, Minjuan .
CITIES, 2019, 93 :215-223