Agroeconomic analyses of drip irrigation for sugarbeet production

被引:13
作者
Sharmasarkar, FC
Sharmasarkar, S [1 ]
Held, LJ
Miller, SD
Vance, GF
Zhang, RD
机构
[1] Univ Wyoming, Coll Agr, Dept Renewable Resources, Laramie, WY 82071 USA
[2] Univ Wyoming, Coll Agr, Dept Agr & Appl Econ, Laramie, WY 82071 USA
关键词
D O I
10.2134/agronj2001.933517x
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Sugarbeet (Beta vulgaris L.) is a major cash crop in Wyoming where overuse of water and agrochemicals is a concern in furrow-irrigated areas. Drip irrigation, an alternative technology, is not well developed for row crops within the state. Therefore, our objective was to evaluate the economic feasibility of implementing drip irrigation practice for sugarbeet production. Capital Budgeting analyses, including net present value (NPV) and rate of return (ROR), were used for 10 to 40 ha. Sensitivity analyses were conducted with drip system size and life span, interest rate,water price, and weed control cost. Sugarbeet and sugar yields were higher under drip irrigation than furrow irrigation at P = 0.05. The drip system investment cost decreased with increasing size. Total variable costs for drip irrigation were lower than those for furrow irrigation. Sugarbeet returns were $2080 and $2310 ha(-1) for furrow and drip irrigation practices, respectively Higher returns and shorter payback time were observed for large conversion areas. The sensitivity was more pronounced with small-stale farming, increasing interest rates caused delays in positive return and profit and contributed to larger differences in payback lime between drip system sizes. For all conversion sizes, ROR increased with system lifetime. Higher profitability was observed for areas with increased water prices and weed control costs. The overall findings indicated that sugarbeet production under drip irrigation would he most profitable for a 40-ha area with payback periods ranging from 7 to 10 yr.
引用
收藏
页码:517 / 523
页数:7
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
*AAEA, 1998, COMMODITY COSTS RETU, P1
[2]  
[Anonymous], FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT
[3]  
*BAK ASS CONS ENG, 1989, UNT REP WYOM DEP ENV
[4]  
BIHERY MA, 1994, EGYPT ENV GEOL, V24, P293
[5]   AN ECONOMIC COMPARISON OF SUBSURFACE MICROIRRIGATION WITH CENTER PIVOT SPRINKLER IRRIGATION [J].
BOSCH, DJ ;
POWELL, NL ;
WRIGHT, FS .
JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION AGRICULTURE, 1992, 5 (04) :431-437
[6]  
Brigham E.F, 2021, CENGAGE LEARNING
[7]  
CASLER GL, 1984, CAPITAL INVESTMENT A
[8]  
GILLEY JR, 1983, T ASAE, V26, P1784
[9]   SOIL PHYSICS AND IRRIGATION - TAPPING THE POTENTIAL FOR DRIP [J].
GREGORY, PJ .
AGRICULTURAL WATER MANAGEMENT, 1990, 17 (1-3) :159-169
[10]  
Hamakar C., 1996, J AM SOC FARM MANAGE, P42