Assessment of Input Uncertainty in SWAT Using Latent Variables

被引:27
作者
Yen, Haw [1 ,2 ]
Jeong, Jaehak [1 ]
Feng, QingYu [3 ]
Deb, Debjani [4 ]
机构
[1] Texas A&M Agrilife Res, Blackland Res & Extens Ctr, Temple, TX 76502 USA
[2] USDA ARS, Grassland Soil & Water Res Lab, 808 East Blackland Rd, Temple, TX 76502 USA
[3] Purdue Univ, Dept Agr & Biol Engn, W Lafayette, IN 47907 USA
[4] Texas A&M Univ, Dept Ecosyst Sci & Management, College Stn, TX 77843 USA
基金
美国农业部;
关键词
Input uncertainty; Model calibration; SWAT; Uncertainty analysis; WATER ASSESSMENT-TOOL; MODELS; SOIL;
D O I
10.1007/s11269-014-0865-y
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
Applications of the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) require a large amount of input data to perform model simulations. Consequently, uncertainty in input data tends to influence the accuracy of SWAT hydrologic and water quality outputs. It has been shown that input uncertainty can be quantified explicitly during model calibration with latent variables. In this study, latent variables were explored to examine their sensitivity to SWAT outputs and further the potential impact of input uncertainty to model predictions. Results show that the increases in the range of latent variables pose a significant influence to streamflow and ammonia predictions while the impact was less significant in sediment responses. The performance of SWAT in predicting streamflow and ammonia declined with wider ranges of latent variables. In addition, the increase in the range of latent variables did not present noticeable effect on the corresponding predictive uncertainty in sediment predictions. In this study, the calibration results did not improve significantly with the applications of wider ranges of latent variables which are different from the findings in previous research work. The use of latent variables to incorporate input uncertainty may not be the proper alternative choice in terms of generating better results and should be carefully evaluated in the implementations of complex watershed simulation models.
引用
收藏
页码:1137 / 1153
页数:17
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   An integrated hydrologic Bayesian multimodel combination framework: Confronting input, parameter, and model structural uncertainty in hydrologic prediction [J].
Ajami, Newsha K. ;
Duan, Qingyun ;
Sorooshian, Soroosh .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2007, 43 (01)
[2]   Assessing the Impacts of Climate Change on Hydrology of the Upper Reach of the Spree River: Germany [J].
Al-Mukhtar, Mustafa ;
Dunger, Volkmar ;
Merkel, Broder .
WATER RESOURCES MANAGEMENT, 2014, 28 (10) :2731-2749
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, US GEOLOGICAL SURVEY
[4]  
[Anonymous], 439 TEX A M U SYST
[5]   Is point uncertain rainfall likely to have a great impact on distributed complex hydrological modeling? [J].
Balin, Daniela ;
Lee, Hyosang ;
Rode, Michael .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2010, 46
[6]   EFFECTIVE AND EFFICIENT GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION FOR CONCEPTUAL RAINFALL-RUNOFF MODELS [J].
DUAN, QY ;
SOROOSHIAN, S ;
GUPTA, V .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1992, 28 (04) :1015-1031
[7]  
Gassman PW, 2007, T ASABE, V50, P1211, DOI 10.13031/2013.23637
[8]   STOCHASTIC RELAXATION, GIBBS DISTRIBUTIONS, AND THE BAYESIAN RESTORATION OF IMAGES [J].
GEMAN, S ;
GEMAN, D .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 1984, 6 (06) :721-741
[9]  
Kavetski D., 2002, CALIBRATION WATERSHE, P49, DOI DOI 10.1029/WS006P0049
[10]   A METHOD FOR ROBUST-CALIBRATION OF ECOLOGICAL MODELS UNDER DIFFERENT TYPES OF UNCERTAINTY [J].
KLEPPER, O ;
HENDRIX, EMT .
ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 1994, 74 (3-4) :161-182