Proposal of a Self-Assessment Competency Framework for Transdisciplinary Engineering

被引:0
作者
Sajdakova, J. [1 ]
Carey, E. [1 ]
Dhokia, V [1 ]
Newnes, L. [1 ]
Parry, G. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bath, Dept Mech Engn, Bath BA2 7AY, Avon, England
[2] Univ Surrey, Guildford, Surrey, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
Transdisciplinarity; transdisciplinary research; transdisciplinary engineering research; design engineer; competencies; skills; trasdisciplinary competencies; EDUCATION; INTERDISCIPLINARY; COLLABORATION; CHALLENGES; MANAGEMENT; KNOWLEDGE; FUTURE; TEAMS;
D O I
10.1142/S2424862222500221
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Transdisciplinary (TD) working is claimed to be critical to meet future societal needs, with engineers being at the core to provide solutions to these challenges. However, there is little available that enables one to assess whether they or their team have the competencies required. Within this paper, we propose a self-assessment framework to ascertain whether design engineers have the competencies which enable TD working. We describe how the competencies were identified using a systematic literature review (SLR), we then describe how we utilized coded decision trees to classify which disciplinary level a particular competency can enable. In total, 76 competencies were classified; the results of the analysis show 20 of these displaying TD attributes as defined by Jantsch. The novelty of the approach is as follows: (1) In this paper, we propose a novel way to map the identified competencies against the levels of Jantsch's hierarchical framework. (2) The proposed framework enables self-assessment of individual or team competencies to assess whether they have the competencies which enable TD working. (3) It enables a move towards incorporating TD practices in engineering projects.
引用
收藏
页码:373 / 396
页数:24
相关论文
共 66 条
[31]  
Kharlamov A., 2019, ADV TRANSDISCIPLINAR
[32]   Evaluation of interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary research - A literature review [J].
Klein, Julie T. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PREVENTIVE MEDICINE, 2008, 35 (02) :S116-S123
[33]  
Lattanzio S., 2020, 27 TRANSDISCIPLINARY
[34]   Classifying the Disciplinarity of Engineering Academic Literature [J].
Lattanzio, Susan ;
Mogles, Nataliya ;
Carey, Emily ;
Kharlamov, Alex ;
Parry, Glenn ;
Hicks, Ben ;
Newnes, Linda .
TRANSDISCIPLINARY ENGINEERING FOR COMPLEX SOCIO-TECHNICAL SYSTEMS - REAL-LIFE APPLICATIONS, 2020, 12 :23-31
[35]   Adoption of promising practices: a systematic review of the evidence [J].
Leseure, MJ ;
Bauer, J ;
Birdi, K ;
Neely, A ;
Denyer, D .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, 2004, 5-6 (3-4) :169-190
[36]  
MassonDelmotte V., 2019, IPCC SPECIAL REPORT, DOI DOI 10.1017/9781009157940.004
[37]  
Mathiasen JB, 2017, J IND INTEGR MANAG, V2, DOI 10.1142/S2424862217500178
[38]   Beginning at the end: The outcome spaces framework to guide purposive transdisciplinary research [J].
Mitchell, Cynthia ;
Cordell, Dana ;
Fam, Dena .
FUTURES, 2015, 65 :86-96
[39]   Architectural Modeling of Transdisciplinary System with Inherent Social Perspectives [J].
Mo, John P. T. ;
Beckett, Ronald C. .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL INTEGRATION AND MANAGEMENT-INNOVATION AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP, 2019, 4 (04)
[40]   TOWARDS THE TRANSDISCIPLINARY ENGINEER: INCORPORATING ECOLOGY, EQUITY AND DEMOCRACY CONCERNS INTO WATER PROFESSIONALS' ATTITUDES, SKILLS AND KNOWLEDGE [J].
Mollinga, Peter P. .
IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE, 2009, 58 :S195-S204