The Reconciliation Project: Separation and Integration in Business Ethics Research

被引:33
作者
Alzola, Miguel [1 ]
机构
[1] Fordham Univ, Dept Legal & Eth Studies, New York, NY 10023 USA
关键词
business ethics research; separation thesis; integration thesis; STAKEHOLDER THEORY; THESIS; SELF;
D O I
10.1007/s10551-011-0746-8
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This article is about the relationship between business and ethics in academic research. The purpose of this investigation is to examine the status of the separation and the integration theses. In the course of this article, I defend the claim that neither separation nor integration is entirely accurate; indeed they are both potentially confusing to our audience. A strategy of reconciliation of normative and descriptive approaches is proposed. The reconciliation project does not entail synthesizing or dividing prescriptive and empirical approaches, but rather respecting the identity of both inquiries, while recognizing the limitations they place on each other. The research agenda of the reconciliation project is discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 36
页数:18
相关论文
共 83 条
[1]   Dialogue: Toward superior stakeholder theory [J].
Agle, Bradley R. ;
Donaldson, Thomas ;
Freeman, R. Edward ;
Jensen, Michael C. ;
Mitchell, Ronald K. ;
Wood, Donna J. .
BUSINESS ETHICS QUARTERLY, 2008, 18 (02) :153-190
[2]   Character and environment: The status of virtues in organizations [J].
Alzola, Miguel .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS, 2008, 78 (03) :343-357
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1947, ADM BEHAV STUDY DECI
[4]  
[Anonymous], BUSINESS SCI ETHICS
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1970, The New York Times
[6]  
[Anonymous], THESIS RUTGERS U NEW
[7]  
[Anonymous], ESSAYS MORAL REALISM
[8]  
[Anonymous], RES ETHICAL ISSUES O
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1947, Foundations of economic analysis
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1891, SCOPE METHOD POLITIC