Evaluation of Ultrasound-guided 8-Gauge Vacuum-assisted Excision System for the Removal of US-detectable Breast Lesions

被引:27
作者
Perretta, Tommaso [1 ]
Lamacchia, Feliciana [1 ]
Ferrari, Donatella [1 ]
Beninati, Emanuela [1 ]
Di Tosto, Federica [1 ]
De Stasio, Vincenzo [1 ]
Meucci, Rosaria [1 ,2 ]
Di Stefano, Carla [1 ]
Buonomo, Oreste Claudio [3 ]
Vanni, Gianluca [3 ]
Pistolese, Chiara Adriana [1 ]
机构
[1] Tor Vergata Univ Rome, Policlin Tor Vergata, Dept Biomed & Prevent, Diagnost Imaging Unit, Rome, Italy
[2] Tor Vergata Univ Rome, Appl Med Surg Sci, Rome, Italy
[3] Policlin Tor Vergata PTV Univ, Dept Surg Sci, Breast Unit, Rome, Italy
关键词
Vacuum-assisted excision; vacuum-assisted breast biopsy; ultrasound; breast lesions; lesions of uncertain malignant potential; breast cancer; CORE NEEDLE-BIOPSY; DIAGNOSIS; GUIDANCE; CARCINOMA; B3;
D O I
10.21873/anticanres.14125
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Aim: To assess the ability of ultrasound (US)-guided vacuum-assisted breast excision (VAE) to remove Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) >= 3 breast lesions in order to analyze US features most frequently associated with complete excision. Materials and Methods: A total of 266 BI-RADS >= 3 lesions without microcalcifications underwent USVAE. US-VAE and gold standard pathological results were compared. US features of lesions were analyzed. Results: The complete excision rate was 93.61%; the VAE agreement rate was 99.62%. Circumscribed margins, regular shape, parallel orientation, and the absence of posterior features were favorable US features associated with complete excision. Lesions completely excised were: BI-RADS 3 <= 21.10 mm and BI-RADS 4 <= 18.70 mm with one unfavorable US characteristic, and BI-RADS 4 lesions <= 13.5 mm with two unfavorable US features hindered complete removal. Two atypical ductal hyperplasias (<10 mm, one unfavorable feature) and eight ductal carcinomas in situ (<= 8.7 mm, one/two unfavorable features) were completely removed. Conclusion: US-VAE is highly accurate for diagnostic purpose and, in some cases, highly successful for complete lesion excision. This success also depends on the US characteristics and size of the lesion.
引用
收藏
页码:1719 / 1729
页数:11
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
Abbate F, 2011, J Ultrasound, V14, P177, DOI 10.1016/j.jus.2011.10.003
[2]   Benign papilloma: is US-guided vacuum-assisted breast biopsy an alternative to surgical biopsy? [J].
Bonaventure, T. ;
Cormier, B. ;
Lebas, P. ;
Bonneau, C. ;
Michenet, P. .
JOURNAL DE RADIOLOGIE, 2007, 88 (09) :1165-1168
[3]  
Burbank F, 1996, AM SURGEON, V62, P738
[4]   Will the spectrum of lesions prompting a "B3" breast core biopsy increase the benign biopsy rate? [J].
Carder, PJ ;
Liston, JC .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2003, 56 (02) :133-138
[5]  
DOrsi C., 2013, ACR BIRADS BREAST IM
[6]   A prospective study of the removal rate of imaged breast lesions by an 11-gauge vacuum-assisted biopsy probe system [J].
Fine, RE ;
Israel, PZ ;
Walker, LC ;
Corgan, KR ;
Greenwald, LV ;
Berenson, JE ;
Boyd, BA ;
Oliver, MK ;
McClure, T ;
Elberfeld, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2001, 182 (04) :335-340
[7]   Preoperative mammotome biopsy of ducts beneath the nipple areola complex [J].
Govindarajulu, S. ;
Narreddy, S. ;
Shere, M. H. ;
Ibrahim, N. B. N. ;
Sahu, A. K. ;
Cawthorn, S. J. .
EJSO, 2006, 32 (04) :410-412
[8]   Interdisciplinary Consensus Recommendations for the use of Vacuum-Assisted Breast Biopsy under Sonographic Guidance: First update 2012 [J].
Hahn, M. ;
Krainick-Strobel, U. ;
Toellner, T. ;
Gissler, J. ;
Kluge, S. ;
Krapfl, E. ;
Peisker, U. ;
Duda, V. ;
Degenhardt, F. ;
Sinn, H. P. ;
Wallwiener, D. ;
Gruber, I. V. .
ULTRASCHALL IN DER MEDIZIN, 2012, 33 (04) :366-371
[9]   EFFICACY OF AUTOMATED BIOPSY GUNS VERSUS CONVENTIONAL BIOPSY NEEDLES IN THE PYGMY PIG [J].
HOPPER, KD ;
BAIRD, DE ;
REDDY, VV ;
LANDIS, JR ;
PARKER, SH ;
TYLER, HN ;
OWNBEY, JL ;
MCCAUSLIN, MA ;
YAKES, WF ;
SABATELLI, FW ;
MOTT, PL .
RADIOLOGY, 1990, 176 (03) :671-676
[10]   Stereotactic breast biopsy of nonpalpable lesions: Determinants of ductal carcinoma in situ underestimation rates [J].
Jackman, RJ ;
Burbank, F ;
Parker, SH ;
Evans, WP ;
Lechner, MC ;
Richardson, TR ;
Smid, AA ;
Borofsky, HB ;
Lee, CH ;
Goldstein, HM ;
Schilling, KJ ;
Wray, AB ;
Brem, BF ;
Helbich, TH ;
Lehrer, DE ;
Adler, SJ .
RADIOLOGY, 2001, 218 (02) :497-502