Specific Feedback Matters - The Role of Specific Feedback in the Development of Trust in Automated Driving Systems

被引:0
作者
Edelmann, Aaron [1 ]
Stuemper, Stefan [1 ]
Petzoldt, Tibor [2 ]
机构
[1] Audi AG, D-85045 Ingolstadt, Germany
[2] Tech Univ Dresden, Dept Traff & Transportat Psychol, D-01062 Dresden, Germany
来源
2019 30TH IEEE INTELLIGENT VEHICLES SYMPOSIUM (IV19) | 2019年
关键词
ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL; MENTAL MODEL; ACCEPTANCE; CONFIDENCE;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In order to benefit from the potential of automated driving, the systems have to be used appropriately by drivers. Usage is in turn dependent on trust, which is, among other things, influenced by system knowledge and experience. One way of conveying system knowledge is by presenting feedback of limitations and constraints. The present study investigates the influence of specific as opposed to non-specific feedback on the evolution of trust with an intelligent parking assistant (IPA). The research focused on the question how the trust development can be described in a level 2 automation system and how it differs between feedback specificity levels. Therefore, 22 participants took part in an on-road longitudinal study, in which they performed a total of forty parking maneuvers while using the IPA. During the first twenty parking maneuvers no specific feedback was presented in case of a fault due to system limitations, whereas during the second twenty parking maneuvers specific feedback corresponding to situational factors and system constraints was given. The results show that non-specific feedback does not lead to an increase of trust at all. The errors that occur due to system and sensor limitations remain inexplicable and thus unpredictable. On the other hand, specific feedback that corresponds to the situation leads to the formation and stabilization of trust in accordance with the power law of learning. Therefore, it is advisable that users ideally receive specific feedback in order to gain knowledge of a system's limitations. This promotes the development of trust and ensures appropriate system use.
引用
收藏
页码:2223 / 2228
页数:6
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], TAX DEF TERMS REL ON
[2]  
Bagheri N, 2004, IEEE SYS MAN CYBERN, P212
[3]   Learning and development of trust, acceptance and the mental model of ACC. A longitudinal on-road study [J].
Beggiato, Matthias ;
Pereira, Marta ;
Petzoldt, Tibor ;
Krems, Josef .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2015, 35 :75-84
[4]   The evolution of mental model, trust and acceptance of adaptive cruise control in relation to initial information [J].
Beggiato, Matthias ;
Krems, Josef F. .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH PART F-TRAFFIC PSYCHOLOGY AND BEHAVIOUR, 2013, 18 :47-57
[5]   The role of trust in automation reliance [J].
Dzindolet, MT ;
Peterson, SA ;
Pomranky, RA ;
Pierce, LG ;
Beck, HP .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMAN-COMPUTER STUDIES, 2003, 58 (06) :697-718
[6]   Extending the Technology Acceptance Model to assess automation [J].
Ghazizadeh, Mahtab ;
Lee, John D. ;
Boyle, Linda Ng .
COGNITION TECHNOLOGY & WORK, 2012, 14 (01) :39-49
[7]   Trust in Automation: Integrating Empirical Evidence on Factors That Influence Trust [J].
Hoff, Kevin Anthony ;
Bashir, Masooda .
HUMAN FACTORS, 2015, 57 (03) :407-434
[8]  
Jian Jiun-Yin, 2000, Int. J. Cognit. Ergon., V4, P53, DOI [10.1207/S15327566IJCE040104, DOI 10.1207/S15327566IJCE040104]
[9]  
Korber Moritz, 2014, POTENTIAL INDIVIDUAL, DOI [10.1145/2662253.2662275, DOI 10.1145/2662253.2662275]
[10]  
Krems JF, 2009, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V5619, P986, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-02806-9_113