What Competencies Should Undergraduate Engineering Programs Emphasize? A Systematic Review

被引:210
作者
Passow, Honor J. [1 ]
Passow, Christian H. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Dartmouth Coll, Geisel Sch Med, One Med Ctr Dr,WTRB Level 5, Lebanon, NH 03766 USA
[2] Creare LLC, Design Serv, 16 Great Hollow Rd, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
[3] Creare LLC, 16 Great Hollow Rd, Hanover, NH 03755 USA
关键词
workplace; competence; systematic review; accreditation; outcomes; WORK; QUALITY; EDUCATION; GRADUATE; FUTURE;
D O I
10.1002/jee.20171
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Background Under Washington Accord or ABET accreditation requirements, faculty must envision, collectively articulate, and prioritize the competencies that students should gain from their educational program to prepare for life and myriad career paths. Purpose When faculty create specifications for designing a curriculum, they need to answer questions, including "Among generic engineering competencies, what is the relative importance for professional practice across disciplines and work contexts?" Scope/Method A search identified the intersection of four concepts (competence, engineering, practice, and importance) in engineering and education databases (8,232 reports, 1990-2012). This review integrates a quantitative synthesis inspired by meta-analytic techniques (27 studies, 14,429 participants) and a qualitative thematic analysis (25 studies, 2,174 participants plus 36,100 job postings) to establish a comprehensive list of generic engineering competencies, their relative importance, and rich descriptions highlighting interrelationships. Conclusions Engineers' technical work is inseparably intertwined with team-player collaboration. The most crucial skill is coordinating multiple competencies to accomplish a goal. Sixteen generic competencies important for engineering practice are defined. Compared with Washington Accord graduate attributes, the evidence-based competencies re-envision "teamwork" as coordinate efforts, split "life-long learning" into gather information and expand skills, broaden "ethics" to take responsibility, expand "design experiments" to measure accurately and separate it from interpret data, apply "contemporary issues" and "impacts" in define constraints, modify "manage projects" to devise process, and add important competencies (take initiative, think creatively, and make decisions). Definitions are refined for communicate effectively, design solutions, apply knowledge, apply skills, and solve problems. Problem solving is the core of engineering practice.
引用
收藏
页码:475 / 526
页数:52
相关论文
共 87 条
[1]  
AbdElall S., 2012, INT C INT MOB COMP A
[2]  
Acosta A., 2010, THESIS
[3]  
Anderson K., 2009, ASEE ANN C AUST TX
[4]   Understanding engineering work and identity: a cross-case analysis of engineers within six firms [J].
Anderson, Kevin John Boyett ;
Courter, Sandra Shaw ;
McGlamery, Tom ;
Nathans-Kelly, Traci M. ;
Nicometo, Christine G. .
ENGINEERING STUDIES, 2010, 2 (03) :153-174
[5]  
Anderson L., 2009, TAXONOMY LEARNING TE
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2006, J ENG EDUC, V95, P259
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2018, COCHRANE HDB SYSTEMA
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2014, CRIT ACCR ENG PROGR
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2004, ENG 2020 VIS ENG NEW
[10]  
[Anonymous], EUROPEAN J ENG ED