Does osteoporosis therapy invalidate FRAX for fracture prediction?

被引:98
作者
Leslie, William D. [1 ]
Lix, Lisa M. [2 ]
Johansson, Helena [3 ]
Oden, Anders [3 ]
McCloskey, Eugene [4 ]
Kanis, John A. [5 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manitoba, Dept Med C5121, Winnipeg, MB R2H 2A6, Canada
[2] Univ Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, SK, Canada
[3] Consulting Statistician, Gothenburg, Sweden
[4] No Gen Hosp, Osteoporosis Ctr, Sheffield S5 7AU, S Yorkshire, England
[5] Univ Sheffield, WHO Collaborating Ctr Metab Bone Dis, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
关键词
OSTEOPOROSIS; BONE DENSITOMETRY; TREATMENTS; POPULATION STUDIES; EPIDEMIOLOGY; BONE-DENSITY; POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN; VERTEBRAL FRACTURES; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; RISK-ASSESSMENT; VALIDATION; MEN; CONSTRUCTION; MANAGEMENT; TOOL;
D O I
10.1002/jbmr.1582
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Ten-year fracture risk assessment with the fracture risk assessment system (FRAX) is increasingly used to guide treatment decisions. Osteoporosis pharmacotherapy reduces fracture risk, but the effect is greater than can be explained from the increase in bone mineral density (BMD). Whether this invalidates fracture predictions with FRAX is uncertain. A total of 35,764 women (age =50 years) and baseline BMD testing (1996-2007) had FRAX probabilities retroactively calculated. A provincial pharmacy database was used to identify osteoporosis medication use. Women were categorized as untreated, current high adherence users [medication possession ratio (MPR) =0.80 in the year after BMD testing], current low adherence users (MPR <0.80), and past users. Fractures outcomes to 10 years were established form a population-based health data repository. FRAX and femoral neck BMD alone stratified major osteoporotic and hip fracture risk within untreated and each treated subgroup (all p-values <0.001) with similar area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. In untreated and each treated subgroup, a stepwise gradient in observed 10-year major osteoporotic and hip fracture incidence was found as a function of the predicted probability tertile (all p-values <0.001 for linear trend). Concordance (calibration) plots for major osteoporotic fractures and hip fractures showed good agreement between the predicted and observed 10-year fracture incidence in untreated women and each treated subgroup. Only in the highest risk tertile of women highly adherent to at least 5 years of bisphosphonate use was observed hip fracture risk significantly less than predicted, though major osteoporotic fracture risk was similar to predicted. In summary, this work suggests that the FRAX tool can be used to predict fracture probability in women currently or previously treated for osteoporosis. Although FRAX should not be used to assess the reduction in fracture risk in individuals on treatment, it may still have value for guiding the need for continued treatment or treatment withdrawal. (C) 2012 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.
引用
收藏
页码:1243 / 1251
页数:9
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, GUID ATC CLASS DDD A
[2]   Recalculation of the NHANES database SD improves T-score agreement and reduces osteoporosis prevalence [J].
Binkley, N ;
Kiebzak, GM ;
Lewiecki, EM ;
Krueger, D ;
Gangnon, RE ;
Miller, PD ;
Shepherd, JA ;
Drezner, MK .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 2005, 20 (02) :195-201
[3]   Effect of osteoporosis treatments on risk of non-vertebral fractures: review and meta-analysis of intention-to-treat studies [J].
Boonen, S ;
Laan, RF ;
Barton, IP ;
Watts, NB .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2005, 16 (10) :1291-1298
[4]   Improvement in spine bone density and reduction in risk of vertebral fractures during treatment with antiresorptive drugs [J].
Cummings, SR ;
Karpf, DB ;
Harris, F ;
Genant, HK ;
Ensrud, K ;
LaCroix, AZ ;
Black, DM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2002, 112 (04) :281-289
[5]   Identification and Validation of Vertebral Compression Fractures Using Administrative Claims Data [J].
Curtis, Jeffrey R. ;
Mudano, Amy S. ;
Solomon, Daniel H. ;
Xi, Juan ;
Melton, Elkins ;
Saag, Kenneth G. .
MEDICAL CARE, 2009, 47 (01) :69-72
[6]   Implications of absolute fracture risk assessment for osteoporosis practice guidelines in the USA [J].
Dawson-Hughes, B. ;
Tosteson, A. N. A. ;
Melton, L. J., III ;
Baim, S. ;
Favus, M. J. ;
Khosla, S. ;
Lindsay, R. L. .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2008, 19 (04) :449-458
[7]   The potential impact of new National Osteoporosis Foundation guidance on treatment patterns [J].
Dawson-Hughes, B. ;
Looker, A. C. ;
Tosteson, A. N. A. ;
Johansson, H. ;
Kanis, J. A. ;
Melton, L. J., III .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 21 (01) :41-52
[8]   Commentary: A revised clinician's guide to the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis [J].
Dawson-Hughes, Bess .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM, 2008, 93 (07) :2463-2465
[9]   Are osteoporotic fractures due to osteoporosis? Impacts of a frailty pandemic in an aging world [J].
Elffors, L .
AGING CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL RESEARCH, 1998, 10 (03) :191-204
[10]   Updated fracture incidence rates for the US version of FRAXA® [J].
Ettinger, B. ;
Black, D. M. ;
Dawson-Hughes, B. ;
Pressman, A. R. ;
Melton, L. J., III .
OSTEOPOROSIS INTERNATIONAL, 2010, 21 (01) :25-33