The overlap model: A model of letter position coding

被引:336
作者
Gomez, Pablo [1 ]
Ratcliff, Roger [2 ]
Perea, Manuel [3 ]
机构
[1] De Paul Univ, Dept Psychol, Chicago, IL 60614 USA
[2] Ohio State Univ, Dept Psychol, Columbus, OH 43210 USA
[3] Univ Valencia, Dept Metodol, Valencia, Spain
关键词
lexical process; letter position coding; word recognition; modeling; perceptual matching;
D O I
10.1037/a0012667
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Recent research has shown that letter identity and letter position are not integral perceptual dimensions (e.g., jugde primes judge in word-recognition experiments). Most comprehensive computational models of visual word recognition (e.g., the interactive activation model, J. L. McClelland & D. E. Rumelhart, 1981, and its successors) assume that the position of each letter within a word is perfectly encoded. Thus, these models are unable to explain the presence of effects of letter transposition (trial trail), letter migration (beard-bread), repeated letters (moose-mouse), or subset/superset effects (faulty-faculty). The authors extend R. Ratcliff's (1981) theory of order relations for encoding of letter positions and show that the model can successfully deal with these effects. The basic assumption is that letters in the visual stimulus have distributions over positions so that the representation of one letter will extend into adjacent letter positions. To test the model, the authors conducted a series of forced-choice perceptual identification experiments. The overlap model produced very good fits to the empirical data, and even a simplified 2-parameter model was capable of producing fits for 104 observed data points with a correlation coefficient of .91.
引用
收藏
页码:577 / 601
页数:25
相关论文
共 100 条
[1]   The effect of neighborhood frequency in reading: Evidence with transposed-letter neighbors [J].
Acha, Joana ;
Perea, Manuel .
COGNITION, 2008, 108 (01) :290-300
[2]   The effects of length and transposed-letter similarity in lexical decision: Evidence with beginning, intermediate, and adult readers [J].
Acha, Joana ;
Perea, Manuel .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2008, 99 :245-264
[3]  
Allport D. A., 1977, ATTENTION PERFORM, VVI, P505
[4]   Lexical retrieval and selection processes: Effects of transposed-letter confusability [J].
Andrews, S .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1996, 35 (06) :775-800
[5]   A formal theory of feature binding in object perception [J].
Ashby, FG ;
Prinzmetal, W ;
Ivry, R ;
Maddox, WT .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1996, 103 (01) :165-192
[6]  
Bates D.M., 1992, Statistical Models, P421, DOI DOI 10.1201/9780203738535
[7]   Automatic semantic activation of embedded words: Is there a "hat" in "that"? [J].
Bowers, JS ;
Davis, CJ ;
Hanley, DA .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 2005, 52 (01) :131-143
[8]   A NOTE ON THE INFORMATIVENESS OF PARTS OF WORDS [J].
BRUNER, JS ;
ODOWD, D .
LANGUAGE AND SPEECH, 1958, 1 (02) :98-101
[9]   Masked priming effects with syllabic neighbors in a lexical decision task [J].
Carreiras, M ;
Perea, M .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 2002, 28 (05) :1228-1242
[10]  
Castles A., 2003, MASKED PRIMING STATE, P345