Resident perceptions of housing, neighborhood, and economic conditions after relocation from public housing undergoing HOPE VI redevelopment

被引:38
作者
Brooks, F
Zugazaga, C
Wolk, J
Adams, MA
机构
[1] Georgia State Univ, Sch Social Work, Atlanta, GA 30302 USA
[2] Auburn Univ, Auburn, AL 36849 USA
关键词
HOPE VI; public housing; affordable housing; Section; 8; Housing; housing vouchers;
D O I
10.1177/1049731505276038
中图分类号
C916 [社会工作、社会管理、社会规划];
学科分类号
1204 ;
摘要
Objective: This study evaluates participant perception of neighborhood, economic, and housing well-being of residents 4 and 5 years after forced relocation from a public housing complex in Atlanta, Georgia. Method: The study used a mixed-method, posttest-only design with two data points. Focus groups with 93 participants combined qualitative, open-ended questions with quantitative measures. Results: Four years after relocation, residents living in homes/apartments found with Section 8 housing vouchers were faring better than residents who moved to other public housing projects. A majority of voucher users believed their house, neighborhood, and overall global living situation had improved since relocation. In the year between the first and second wave of focus groups, 40% of voucher users had moved to a new house/apartment. Moving was associated with residents perceiving their situations improving in many categories. Implications: Our findings suggest HOPE VI developments are more likely to accomplish their objectives if the current administration continues full,funding of the voucher program rather than implements the cutbacks it is currently proposing.
引用
收藏
页码:481 / 490
页数:10
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] BACON E, 1998, J HOUSING COMMUNITY, V55, P7
  • [2] Berg B.L., 1995, QUALITATIVE RES METH
  • [3] BURON L, 2002, HOPE VI RESIDENT TRA
  • [4] GARSHICKKLEIT R, 2003, JOINT M ASS COLL SCH
  • [5] Holin M. J., 2003, Interim Assessment of the HOPE VI Program Cross-Site Report
  • [6] HOLMES B, 2003, UNPUB DRAKE HOMES HO
  • [7] Krueger R., 1998, Developing questions for focus groups
  • [8] PEARCE D, 2002, SELF SUFFICIENCY STA
  • [9] Popkin SJ, 2000, HOUS POLICY DEBATE, V11, P911
  • [10] POPKIN SJ, 2002, CHA RELOCATION COUNS