Spatial Multi-Objective Land Use Optimization toward Livability Based on Boundary-Based Genetic Algorithm: A Case Study in Singapore

被引:28
作者
Cao, Kai [1 ,2 ]
Liu, Muyang [1 ]
Wang, Shu [1 ]
Liu, Mengqi [1 ]
Zhang, Wenting [3 ]
Meng, Qiang [4 ]
Huang, Bo [5 ]
机构
[1] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Geog, Singapore 119077, Singapore
[2] Singapore Management Univ, Sch Informat Syst, Singapore 188065, Singapore
[3] Huazhong Agr Univ, Coll Resources & Environm, Wuhan 430070, Peoples R China
[4] Natl Univ Singapore, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, Singapore 119077, Singapore
[5] Chinese Univ Hong Kong, Dept Geog & Resource Management, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
关键词
spatial multi-objective land use optimization; boundary-based genetic algorithm; livability; accessibility; smart planning; Singapore; MULTIAGENT SYSTEM; ALLOCATION; LIVEABILITY; INDICATORS;
D O I
10.3390/ijgi9010040
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
In this research, the concept of livability has been quantitatively and comprehensively reviewed and interpreted to contribute to spatial multi-objective land use optimization modelling. In addition, a multi-objective land use optimization model was constructed using goal programming and a weighted-sum approach, followed by a boundary-based genetic algorithm adapted to help address the spatial multi-objective land use optimization problem. Furthermore, the model is successfully and effectively applied to the case study in the Central Region of Queenstown Planning Area of Singapore towards livability. In the case study, the experiments based on equal weights and experiments based on different weights combination have been successfully conducted, which can demonstrate the effectiveness of the spatial multi-objective land use optimization model developed in this research as well as the robustness and reliability of computer-generated solutions. In addition, the comparison between the computer-generated solutions and the two real planned scenarios has also clearly demonstrated that our generated solutions are much better in terms of fitness values. Lastly, the limitation and future direction of this research have been discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 39 条
[21]   The Urban Liveability Index: developing a policy-relevant urban liveability composite measure and evaluating associations with transport mode choice [J].
Higgs, Carl ;
Badland, Hannah ;
Simons, Koen ;
Knibbs, Luke D. ;
Giles-Corti, Billie .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEALTH GEOGRAPHICS, 2019, 18 (1)
[22]   Multiobjective decision support for land-use planning [J].
Janssen, Ron ;
van Herwijnen, Madan ;
Stewart, Theodor J. ;
Aerts, Jeroen C. J. H. .
ENVIRONMENT AND PLANNING B-PLANNING & DESIGN, 2008, 35 (04) :740-756
[23]  
La Rocca RA, 2010, TEMA, V3, P85
[24]   Spatial optimization as a generative technique for sustainable multiobjective land-use allocation [J].
Ligmann-Zielinska, Arika ;
Church, Richard L. ;
Jankowski, Piotr .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOGRAPHICAL INFORMATION SCIENCE, 2008, 22 (06) :601-622
[25]   Developing indicators for comprehensive and sustainable transport planning [J].
Litman, Todd .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2007, (2017) :10-15
[26]  
Lynch Kevin, 1981, A theory of good city form
[27]   Developing context-sensitive livability indicators for transportation planning: a measurement framework [J].
Miller, Harvey J. ;
Witlox, Frank ;
Tribby, Calvin P. .
JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2013, 26 :51-64
[28]   URBAN LIVEABILITY - A REVIEW [J].
PACIONE, M .
URBAN GEOGRAPHY, 1990, 11 (01) :1-30
[29]   Livability for all? Conceptual limits and practical implications [J].
Ruth, Matthias ;
Franklin, Rachel S. .
APPLIED GEOGRAPHY, 2014, 49 :18-23
[30]   A genetic algorithm approach to multiobjective land use planning [J].
Stewart, TJ ;
Janssen, R ;
van Herwijnen, M .
COMPUTERS & OPERATIONS RESEARCH, 2004, 31 (14) :2293-2313