Impact of Dose Reduction of Afatinib Used in Patients With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

被引:5
|
作者
Wang, Ziyu [1 ,2 ]
Du, Xin [1 ,3 ]
Chen, Ken [4 ]
Li, Shanshan [1 ]
Yu, Zhiheng [1 ,5 ]
Wu, Ziyang [1 ]
Yang, Li [1 ]
Chen, Dingding [2 ]
Liu, Wei [1 ]
机构
[1] Peking Univ Third Hosp, Dept Pharm, Beijing, Peoples R China
[2] China Pharmaceut Univ, Sch Basic Med Sci, Clin Pharm, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[3] Peking Univ Hlth Sci Ctr, Sch Pharmaceut Sci, Dept Pharm Adm, Clin Pharm, Beijing, Peoples R China
[4] Univ Nebraska Med Ctr, Coll Pharm, Omaha, NE USA
[5] Peking Univ Third Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Beijing, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
afatinib; non-small cell lung cancer; dose reduction; effectiveness; safety; meta-analysis; OPEN-LABEL; PHASE-I; 1ST-LINE TREATMENT; REAL-WORLD; ADENOCARCINOMA; TRIAL; BEVACIZUMAB; GEFITINIB; ERLOTINIB;
D O I
10.3389/fphar.2021.781084
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Background and Aim: As one of the second-generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors, afatinib brings survival benefits to patients with common and rare EGFR mutations. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of 30 and 40 mg of afatinib in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) using qualitative and quantitative analysis methods so as to provide reference for clinical medication.Methods: The PubMed, Embase, , Cochrane Library, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and WanFang databases were thoroughly searched from inception to February 26, 2021. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted data, and evaluated the quality. RevMan and Stata 15.0 were used for meta-analysis.Results: Twelve cohort studies including 1290 patients for final analysis were selected; of which, 1129 patients were analyzed to measure the effectiveness outcomes and 470 patients were analyzed for safety outcomes. In patients with non-brain metastasis, the progression-free survival of the first- or second-line treatment with reduced-dose afatinib was equivalent to the conventional dose. In terms of safety, the reduced dose could significantly lower the incidence of severe diarrhea and severe rash, but not the total incidence of diarrhea, rash, and all levels of paronychia.Conclusions: The incidence of common serious adverse reactions was significantly lower with 30 mg of afatinib than with 40 mg of afatinib in patients with NSCLC. The effectiveness appeared to be similar to that in patients with non-brain metastasis. This study provides a reference for clinical dose reduction of afatinib.Systematic Review Registration: [PROSPERO], identifier [CRD42021238043]
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of gefitinib, erlotinib and afatinib in non-small cell lung cancer: A meta-analysis
    Yang, Zuyao
    Hackshaw, Allan
    Feng, Qi
    Fu, Xiaohong
    Zhang, Yuelun
    Mao, Chen
    Tang, Jinling
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2017, 140 (12) : 2805 - 2819
  • [2] The Impact of Afatinib on Survival in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Wang, Chi
    Li, Yun
    Ke, Li
    Cao, Lejie
    Fan, Pingsheng
    Wu, Zhiwei
    Wu, Quan
    JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2019, 10 (04): : 885 - 892
  • [3] Efficacy of Afatinib in the Treatment of Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer and Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
    Maarof, Nian N. N.
    Alsalahi, Abdulsamad
    Abdulmalek, Emilia
    Fakurazi, Sharida
    Tejo, Bimo Ario
    Rahman, Mohd Basyaruddin Abdul
    CANCERS, 2021, 13 (04) : 1 - 22
  • [4] Afatinib for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer
    Biello, Federica
    Maggioni, Claudia
    Rijavec, Erika
    Genova, Carlo
    Barletta, Giulia
    Gualco, Elisa
    Truini, Anna
    Coco, Simona
    Dal Bello, Maria Giovanna
    Vanni, Irene
    Alama, Angela
    Boccardo, Francesco
    Grossi, Francesco
    EXPERT OPINION ON ORPHAN DRUGS, 2015, 3 (11): : 1357 - 1364
  • [5] The prevalence of EGFR mutation in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhang, Yue-Lun
    Yuan, Jin-Qiu
    Wang, Kai-Feng
    Fu, Xiao-Hong
    Han, Xiao-Ran
    Threapleton, Diane
    Yang, Zu-Yao
    Mao, Chen
    Tang, Jin-Ling
    ONCOTARGET, 2016, 7 (48) : 78971 - 78979
  • [6] Efficacy and safety of erlotinib combined with bevacizumab in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Zhou, Kenan
    Zhao, Shishun
    Guo, Wenlai
    Ding, Lei
    MEDICINE, 2020, 99 (03)
  • [7] Treatment beyond progression in non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Kuo, Wei-Ke
    Weng, Ching-Fu
    Lien, Yin-Ju
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2022, 12
  • [8] Do statins improve outcomes for patients with non-small cell lung cancer? A systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
    Li, Feng
    Liu, Guangyu
    Roudi, Raheleh
    Huang, Qi
    Swierzy, Marc
    Ismail, Mahmoud
    Zhao, Song
    Rueckert, Jens-Carsten
    BMJ OPEN, 2018, 8 (09):
  • [9] Non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutation: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis of patient outcomes
    Kwon, Christina Soeun
    Lin, Huamao M.
    Crossland, Victoria
    Churchill, Eric N.
    Curran, Eileen
    Forsythe, Anna
    Tomaras, Dimitrios
    Ou, Sai-Hong Ignatius
    CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2022, 38 (08) : 1341 - 1350
  • [10] Risk of elevated transaminases in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with erlotinib, gefitinib and afatinib: a meta-analysis
    Abdel-Rahman, Omar
    Ahmed, Hoda
    ElHalawani, Hesham
    EXPERT REVIEW OF RESPIRATORY MEDICINE, 2016, 10 (02) : 223 - 234