CLUSTERING RUSSIAN REGIONS BY INNOVATIVE OUTPUTS USING A MULTI INDICATOR APPROACH

被引:0
作者
Mariev, Oleg [1 ]
Pushkarev, Andrey [1 ]
机构
[1] Ural Fed Univ, Grad Sch Econ & Management, Mira St 19, Ekaterinburg, Russia
来源
PROCEEDINGS OF THE 7TH INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE INNOVATION MANAGEMENT, ENTREPRENEURSHIP AND SUSTAINABILITY (IMES 2019) | 2019年
基金
俄罗斯科学基金会;
关键词
Innovation Activity; Russian Regions; Innovative Output; Cluster Analysis; PROXIMITY;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Purpose: In this research, we aim to discover empirically the similarity of Russian regions in terms of innovation activity forming several groups of them. Design/methodology/approach: We are using clustering technique, namely hierarchical clustering and map Russian regions based on the cluster memberships, which provides measure of similarity between all regions of Russia. We employ the region-level dataset of 83 Russian regions for the period from 2010 to 2015. Findings: We find overall strong stratification of the Russian regions, with most of the Russian regions falling into clusters with low innovation outputs. We also find that over the time cluster memberships do not change for low-innovative regions, while for more innovative ones they do. It may imply that regions with higher innovative outputs increase them significantly faster than other regions. Research/practical implications: Our research contributes to better understanding of Russian regional development and has implications for regional policy decisions. We argue that stimulating innovations in leading regions may be beneficial for development of the neighboring regions as well, due to spillover effects. We understand the limitations of the research and propose to investigate further the innovation inputs, as it may provide insight on why regions are performing the way they are. Originality/value: This paper uses multi indicator approach to assess similarities in innovative output of the Russian regions. Our results provide an original insight of the current state of the innovations and their geographical distribution in Russia. This research may be of a practical use to the managerial decisions, connected to the location choice, as well as for adjusting current innovative policy in Russia.
引用
收藏
页码:519 / 533
页数:15
相关论文
共 16 条
  • [1] Knowledge spillover effects: empirical evidence from Russian regions
    Aldieri, Luigi
    Kotsemir, Maxim Nikolaevich
    Vinci, Concetto Paolo
    [J]. QUALITY & QUANTITY, 2018, 52 (05) : 2111 - 2132
  • [2] Spatial diffusion and spatial statistics: revisting Hagerstrand's study of innovation diffusion
    Bivand, Roger
    [J]. SPATIAL STATISTICS CONFERENCE 2015, PART 2, 2015, 27 : 106 - 111
  • [3] Firm-level innovation activity, employee turnover and HRM practices - Evidence from Chinese firms
    Eriksson, Tor
    Qin, Zhihua
    Wang, Wenjing
    [J]. CHINA ECONOMIC REVIEW, 2014, 30 : 583 - 597
  • [4] Hagerstrand T., 1968, INNOVATION DIFFUSION
  • [5] Measuring regional innovation: A critical inspection of the ability of single indicators to shape technological change
    Hauser, Christoph
    Siller, Matthias
    Schatzer, Thomas
    Walde, Janette
    Tappeiner, Gottfried
    [J]. TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING AND SOCIAL CHANGE, 2018, 129 : 43 - 55
  • [6] Innovative territory as a basic element in the spatial structure of the national innovation system
    Ivanov V.V.
    [J]. Regional Research of Russia, 2016, 6 (1) : 70 - 79
  • [7] Proximity and inter-organizational collaboration: A literature review
    Knoben, J.
    Oerlemans, L. A. G.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT REVIEWS, 2006, 8 (02) : 71 - 89
  • [8] Kuah A.T. H., 2002, J RES MARK ENTREP, V4, P206, DOI DOI 10.1108/14715200280001472
  • [9] Pilot Innovative Territorial Clusters in Russia: A Sustainable Development Model
    Kutsenko, Evgeniy
    [J]. FORESIGHT AND STI GOVERNANCE, 2015, 9 (01) : 32 - 55
  • [10] What drives innovation in the agricultural sector? A spatial analysis of knowledge spillovers
    Lapple, Doris
    Renwick, Alan
    Cullinan, John
    Thorne, Fiona
    [J]. LAND USE POLICY, 2016, 56 : 238 - 250