Feasibility of replacing the 3-coach with a 1.5-coach grouping train model in wind tunnel experiment at different yaw angles

被引:9
作者
Yang Bo [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Xiong Xiao-hui [1 ,2 ,3 ]
He Zhao [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Li Xiao-bai [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Xie Peng-hui [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Tang Ming-zan [1 ,2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Cent South Univ, Minist Educ, Key Lab Traff Safety Track, Changsha 410075, Peoples R China
[2] Joint Int Res Lab Key Technol Rail Traff Safety, Changsha 410075, Peoples R China
[3] Natl & Local Joint Engn Res Ctr Safety Technol Ra, Changsha 410075, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划;
关键词
wind tunnel; electric multiple unit; pressure coefficient; yaw angle; scanning valve; 1; 5-coach grouping; HIGH-SPEED TRAIN; AERODYNAMIC CHARACTERISTICS; CROSSWIND ACTION; RAIL VEHICLES; STABILITY; SLIPSTREAM; SIMULATION;
D O I
10.1007/s11771-022-5060-3
中图分类号
TF [冶金工业];
学科分类号
0806 ;
摘要
The effects of different yaw angles on the aerodynamic performance of city electric multiple units (EMUs) were investigated in a wind tunnel using a 1:16.8 scaled model. Pressure scanning valve and six-component box-type aerodynamic balance were used to test the pressure distribution and aerodynamic force of the head car respectively from the 1.5- and 3-coach grouping city EMU models. Meanwhile, the effects of the yaw angles on the pressure distribution of the streamlined head as well as the aerodynamic forces of the train were analyzed. The experimental results showed that the pressure coefficient was the smallest at the maximum slope of the main shape-line. The side force coefficient and pressure coefficient along the head car cross-section were most affected by crosswind when the yaw angle was 55 degrees, and replacing a 3-coach grouping with a 1.5-coach grouping had obvious advantages for wind tunnel testing when the yaw angle was within 24.2 degrees. In addition, the relative errors of lift coefficient C-L, roll moment coefficient C-Mx, side force coefficient C-S, and drag coefficient C-D between the 1.5- and 3-coach cases were below 5.95%, which all met the requirements of the experimental accuracy.
引用
收藏
页码:2062 / 2073
页数:12
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, GJB1179A
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2010, 140676 BS EN
[3]   Measurements of the cross wind forces on trains [J].
Baker, CJ ;
Jones, J ;
Lopez-Calleja, F ;
Munday, J .
JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2004, 92 (7-8) :547-563
[4]   Wind tunnel analysis of the slipstream and wake of a high-speed train [J].
Bell, J. R. ;
Burton, D. ;
Thompson, M. ;
Herbst, A. ;
Sheridan, J. .
JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2014, 134 :122-138
[5]   Crosswind action on rail vehicles: Wind tunnel experimental analyses [J].
Bocciolone, Marco ;
Cheli, Federico ;
Corradi, Roberto ;
Muggiasca, Sara ;
Tomasini, Gisella .
JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2008, 96 (05) :584-610
[6]   Crosswind action on rail vehicles: A methodology for the estimation of the characteristic wind curves [J].
Cheli, Federico ;
Corradi, Roberto ;
Tomasini, Gisella .
JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2012, 104 :248-255
[7]   On computational fluid dynamics modelling of crosswind effects for high-speed rolling stock [J].
Diedrichs, B .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART F-JOURNAL OF RAIL AND RAPID TRANSIT, 2003, 217 (03) :203-226
[8]   An alternative approach to modelling train stability in high cross winds [J].
Ding, Y. ;
Sterling, M. ;
Baker, C. J. .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE INSTITUTION OF MECHANICAL ENGINEERS PART F-JOURNAL OF RAIL AND RAPID TRANSIT, 2008, 222 (01) :85-97
[9]   Crosswind effects on the stability of a model passenger train-A comparison of static and moving experiments [J].
Dorigatti, F. ;
Sterling, M. ;
Baker, C. J. ;
Quinn, A. D. .
JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2015, 138 :36-51
[10]   On the effect of crosswinds on the slipstream of a freight train and associated effects [J].
Flynn, Dominic ;
Hemida, Hassan ;
Baker, Chris .
JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 2016, 156 :14-28