Fully automatic brain tumor segmentation for 3D evaluation in augmented reality

被引:29
|
作者
Fick, Tim [1 ]
van Doormaal, Jesse A. M. [2 ]
Tosic, Lazar [3 ]
van Zoest, Renate J. [4 ]
Meulstee, Jene W. [1 ]
Hoving, Eelco W. [1 ,2 ]
van Doormaal, Tristan P. C. [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Princess Maxima Ctr Pediat Oncol, Dept Neurooncol, Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Neurosurg, Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] Univ Hosp Zurich, Dept Neurosurg, Zurich, Switzerland
[4] Curacao Med Ctr, Dept Neurol & Neurosurg, Willemstad, Curacao
关键词
augmented reality; brain tumor; segmentation algorithm;
D O I
10.3171/2021.5.FOCUS21200
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
OBJECTIVE For currently available augmented reality workflows, 3D models need to be created with manual or semiautomatic segmentation, which is a time-consuming process. The authors created an automatic segmentation algorithm that generates 3D models of skin, brain, ventricles, and contrast-enhancing tumor from a single T1-weighted MR sequence and embedded this model into an automatic workflow for 3D evaluation of anatomical structures with augmented reality in a cloud environment. In this study, the authors validate the accuracy and efficiency of this automatic segmentation algorithm for brain tumors and compared it with a manually segmented ground truth set. METHODS Fifty contrast-enhanced T1-weighted sequences of patients with contrast-enhancing lesions measuring at least 5 cm(3) were included. All slices of the ground truth set were manually segmented. The same scans were subsequently run in the cloud environment for automatic segmentation. Segmentation times were recorded. The accuracy of the algorithm was compared with that of manual segmentation and evaluated in terms of Sorensen-Dice similarity coefficient (DSC), average symmetric surface distance (ASSD), and 95th percentile of Hausdorff distance (HD95). RESULTS The mean +/- SD computation time of the automatic segmentation algorithm was 753 +/- 128 seconds. The mean +/- SD DSC was 0.868 +/- 0.07, ASSD was 1.31 +/- 0.63 mm, and HD95 was 4.80 +/- 3.18 mm. Meningioma (mean 0.89 and median 0.92) showed greater DSC than metastasis (mean 0.84 and median 0.85). Automatic segmentation had greater accuracy for measuring DSC (mean 0.86 and median 0.87) and HD95 (mean 3.62 mm and median 3.11 mm) of supratentorial metastasis than those of infratentorial metastasis (mean 0.82 and median 0.81 for DSC; mean 5.26 mm and median 4.72 mm for HD95). CONCLUSIONS The automatic cloud-based segmentation algorithm is reliable, accurate, and fast enough to aid neurosurgeons in everyday clinical practice by providing 3D augmented reality visualization of contrast-enhancing intracranial lesions measuring at least 5 cm(3). The next steps involve incorporation of other sequences and improving accuracy with 3D fine-tuning in order to expand the scope of augmented reality workflow.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 8
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Brain Tumor Segmentation and Survival Prediction Using Automatic Hard Mining in 3D CNN Architecture
    Anand, Vikas Kumar
    Grampurohit, Sanjeev
    Aurangabadkar, Pranav
    Kori, Avinash
    Khened, Mahendra
    Bhat, Raghavendra S.
    Krishnamurthi, Ganapathy
    BRAINLESION: GLIOMA, MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS, STROKE AND TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURIES (BRAINLES 2020), PT II, 2021, 12659 : 310 - 319
  • [32] DU-DANet: Efficient 3D Automatic Brain Tumor Segmentation Based on Dual Attention
    Cai, Zhenhua
    Lin, Xiaoli
    Zhang, Xiaolong
    Hu, Jing
    ADVANCED INTELLIGENT COMPUTING TECHNOLOGY AND APPLICATIONS, ICIC 2023, PT III, 2023, 14088 : 791 - 802
  • [33] MTDCNet: A 3D multi-threading dilated convolutional network for brain tumor automatic segmentation
    Chen, Wankun
    Zhou, Weifeng
    Zhu, Ling
    Cao, Yuan
    Gu, Haiming
    Yu, Bin
    JOURNAL OF BIOMEDICAL INFORMATICS, 2022, 133
  • [34] Automatic Segmentation of Brain Tumor Using 3D SE-Inception Networks with Residual Connections
    Yao, Hongdou
    Zhou, Xiaobing
    Zhang, Xuejie
    BRAINLESION: GLIOMA, MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS, STROKE AND TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURIES, BRAINLES 2018, PT II, 2019, 11384 : 346 - 357
  • [35] Multi-Scale 3D U-Nets: An approach to automatic segmentation of brain tumor
    Peng, Suting
    Chen, Wei
    Sun, Jiawei
    Liu, Boqiang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMAGING SYSTEMS AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 30 (01) : 5 - 17
  • [36] Automatic segmentation of brain tumor in intraoperative ultrasound images using 3D U-Net
    Carton, Francois-Xavier
    Chabanas, Matthieu
    Munkvold, Bodil K. R.
    Reinertsen, Ingerid
    Noble, Jack H.
    MEDICAL IMAGING 2020: IMAGE-GUIDED PROCEDURES, ROBOTIC INTERVENTIONS, AND MODELING, 2021, 11315
  • [37] Bag of Tricks for 3D MRI Brain Tumor Segmentation
    Zhao, Yuan-Xing
    Zhang, Yan-Ming
    Liu, Cheng-Lin
    BRAINLESION: GLIOMA, MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS, STROKE AND TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURIES (BRAINLES 2019), PT I, 2020, 11992 : 210 - 220
  • [38] Context Aware 3D UNet for Brain Tumor Segmentation
    Ahmad, Parvez
    Qamar, Saqib
    Shen, Linlin
    Saeed, Adnan
    BRAINLESION: GLIOMA, MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS, STROKE AND TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURIES (BRAINLES 2020), PT I, 2021, 12658 : 207 - 218
  • [39] Visual interpretability in 3D brain tumor segmentation network
    Saleem, Hira
    Shahid, Ahmad Raza
    Raza, Basit
    COMPUTERS IN BIOLOGY AND MEDICINE, 2021, 133
  • [40] Efficient Embedding Network for 3D Brain Tumor Segmentation
    Messaoudi, Hicham
    Belaid, Ahror
    Allaoui, Mohamed Lamine
    Zetout, Ahcene
    Allili, Mohand Said
    Tliba, Souhil
    Ben Salem, Douraied
    Conze, Pierre-Henri
    BRAINLESION: GLIOMA, MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS, STROKE AND TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURIES (BRAINLES 2020), PT I, 2021, 12658 : 252 - 262