The safety of ceftolozane-tazobactam for the treatment of acute bacterial infections: a systemic review and meta-analysis

被引:5
|
作者
Wang, Li-Ting [6 ]
Lin, Wei-Ting [6 ,7 ]
Lai, Chih-Cheng [8 ]
Wang, Ya-Hui [5 ,9 ]
Chen, Cheng-Hsin [4 ,5 ]
Chang, Yen-Teh [1 ]
Chen, Chao-Hsien [2 ,3 ]
Wang, Cheng-Yi [1 ,4 ,5 ]
机构
[1] Cardinal Tien Hosp, Dept Internal Med, 362 Zhongzheng Rd, New Taipei 231, Taiwan
[2] MacKay Mem Hosp, Dept Internal Med, Div Pulm, 45 Minsheng Rd, New Taipei 251, Taiwan
[3] MacKey Med Coll, Dept Med, New Taipei, Taiwan
[4] Fu Jen Catholic Univ, Coll Med, Dept Internal Med, Cardinal Tien Hosp, New Taipei, Taiwan
[5] Fu Jen Catholic Univ, Sch Med, Coll Med, New Taipei, Taiwan
[6] Chi Mei Med Ctr, Dept Orthoped, Tainan, Taiwan
[7] Southern Taiwan Univ Sci & Technol, Dept Mech Engn, Tainan, Taiwan
[8] Tainan Branch, Dept Internal Med, Kaohsiung Vet Gen Hosp, Tainan, Taiwan
[9] Fu Jen Catholic Univ, Cardinal Tien Hosp, Coll Med, Med Res Ctr, New Taipei, Taiwan
关键词
acute bacterial infection; adverse event; ceftolozane-tazobactam; safety; COMPLICATED INTRAABDOMINAL INFECTIONS; URINARY-TRACT-INFECTIONS; IN-VITRO ACTIVITY; DOUBLE-BLIND; PSEUDOMONAS-AERUGINOSA; PLUS METRONIDAZOLE; RESISTANCE; EFFICACY; TRIAL; LEVOFLOXACIN;
D O I
10.1177/20420986211027096
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
Objective(s): The aim of this study was to conduct a meta-analysis to assess the clinical safety of ceftolozane-tazobactam for the treatment of acute bacterial infections in adult patients. Methods: The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched from their inception until May 2020 for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Only RCTs evaluating the risk of adverse events (AEs) for ceftolozane-tazobactam and comparative treatments for acute bacterial infections in adult patients were included. Results: Overall, four RCTs including a total of 2924 patients (1475 in the ceftolozane-tazobactam group and 1449 in the control group) were included in the meta-analysis. The rate of treatment-emergent AEs was 51.3% (748/1458) in the ceftolozane-tazobactam group, which was comparable to the control group, 49.9% [714/1430; odd's ratio (OR), 1.06; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.91-1.25; I-2 = 0%]. In addition, no difference was observed between the ceftolozane-tazobactam and control groups in terms of the risk of serious AEs (OR, 1.22; 95% CI, 0.93-1.61; I-2 = 15.5%) and the risk of discontinuing the study drug due to AEs (OR, 0.85; 95% CI, 0.55-1.33; I-2 = 0%). The rate of all-cause mortality did not significantly differ between the ceftolozane-tazobactam and control groups (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.82-1.50; I-2 = 0%). The only exception was the risk of Clostridiodes difficile (C. difficile) colitis, where ceftolozane-tazobactam treatment was associated with a significantly higher risk compared with the control group [0.72% (10/1376) versus 0.14% (2/1391), OR, 3.84; 95% CI, 1.23-11.97; I-2 = 0%]. Conclusion: Ceftolozane-tazobactam treatment is as tolerable as comparative treatment options for acute bacterial infections in adult patients, however it has an increased risk of C. difficile infection. As a novel broad-spectrum antibiotic, ceftolozane-tazobactam could be a safe therapeutic option for use in common clinical practice. Plain language summary The safety of ceftolozane-tazobactam (an antibiotics) for the treatment of acute bacterial infections Objective(s): Ceftolozane-tazobactam is an effective antibiotic for the treatment of acute bacterial infections. This study conducts a meta-analysis to assess the clinical safety (side effects) of ceftolozane-tazobactam for the treatment of acute bacterial infections in adult patients compared with other drugs. Methods: We extracted data from four randomized controlled trials, including a total of 2924 patients (1475 in the ceftolozane-tazobactam group and 1449 in the control group). Results: The rate of treatment related adverse events (AEs) was similar in the ceftolozane-tazobactam group (51.3%) and control group (49.9%). There was also no difference in risk of serious adverse events, the risk of discontinuing the study drug due to AEs, and all-cause mortality. The only exception was the risk of Clostridiodes difficile colitis (a cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhea), where ceftolozane-tazobactam treatment was associated with a significantly higher risk compared with the control group. Conclusion: In conclusion, as a novel broad-spectrum antibiotic, ceftolozane-tazobactam could be a safe therapeutic option for use in clinical practice.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Ceftolozane-Tazobactam for the Treatment of Multidrug-Resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa Infections: Clinical Effectiveness and Evolution of Resistance
    Haidar, Ghady
    Philips, Nathan J.
    Shields, Ryan K.
    Snyder, Daniel
    Cheng, Shaoji
    Potoski, Brian A.
    Doi, Yohei
    Hao, Binghua
    Press, Ellen G.
    Cooper, Vaughn S.
    Clancy, Cornelius J.
    Hong Nguyen, M.
    CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2017, 65 (01) : 110 - 120
  • [22] The Efficacy and Safety of Eravacycline in the Treatment of Complicated Intra-Abdominal Infections: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
    Lan, Shao-Huan
    Chang, Shen-Peng
    Lai, Chih-Cheng
    Lu, Li-Chin
    Chao, Chien-Ming
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2019, 8 (06)
  • [23] Piperacillin/tazobactam versus carbapenems in patients with severe bacterial infections: A systematic review with meta-analysis
    Munch, Marie Warrer
    Granholm, Anders
    Jonsson, Andreas Bender
    Sjovall, Fredrik
    Helleberg, Marie
    Hertz, Frederik Botius
    Andersen, Jakob Steen
    Steensen, Morten
    Achiam, Michael Patrick
    Perner, Anders
    Moller, Morten Hylander
    ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2023, 67 (07) : 853 - 868
  • [24] Ceftolozane-tazobactam and Fosfomycin for rescue treatment of otogenous meningitis caused by XDR Pseudomonas aeruginosa: Case report and review of the literature
    Frattari, Antonella
    Savini, Vincenzo
    Polilli, Ennio
    Cibelli, Donatella
    Talamazzi, Silvia
    Bosco, Donatella
    Consorte, Augusta
    Fazii, Paolo
    Parruti, Giustino
    IDCASES, 2018, 14
  • [25] The efficacy and safety of tigecycline for the treatment of bloodstream infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Wang, Jian
    Pan, Yaping
    Shen, Jilu
    Xu, Yuanhong
    ANNALS OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY AND ANTIMICROBIALS, 2017, 16
  • [26] A meta-analysis of efficacy and safety of doripenem for treating bacterial infections
    Qu, Xiao-Yu
    Hu, Ting-Ting
    Zhou, Wei
    BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2015, 19 (02) : 156 - 162
  • [27] The efficacy and safety of omadacycline in treating acute bacterial infections: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Chen, Yao-Jie
    Gao, Si-Yuan
    Fu, Jing
    Qin, Sun-Ting
    Kong, Meng-Yu
    Zhang, Xiu-Hua
    Lin, Guan-Yang
    Yu, Xu-Ben
    EXPERT OPINION ON DRUG SAFETY, 2025,
  • [28] The efficacy and safety of ceftaroline in the treatment of acute bacterial infection in pediatric patients - a systemic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials
    Chen, Chih-Wei
    Chang, Shen-Peng
    Huang, Hui-Ting
    Tang, Hung-Jen
    Lai, Chih-Cheng
    INFECTION AND DRUG RESISTANCE, 2019, 12 : 1303 - 1310
  • [29] Omadacycline for treatment of acute bacterial infections: a meta-analysis of phase II/III trials
    Lin, Fei
    He, Rong
    Yu, Bin
    Deng, Bowen
    Ling, Baodong
    Yuan, Mingyong
    BMC INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2023, 23 (01)
  • [30] Efficacy and safety of tigecycline for the treatment of severe infectious diseases: an updated meta-analysis of RCTs
    Shen, Fengcai
    Han, Qianpeng
    Xie, Di
    Fang, Ming
    Zeng, Hongke
    Deng, Yiyu
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2015, 39 : 25 - 33