Imputation approaches for estimating diagnostic accuracy for multiple tests from partially verified designs

被引:11
作者
Albert, Paul S. [1 ]
机构
[1] NCI, Biometr Res Branch, Div Canc Treatment & Diag, Bethesda, MD 20892 USA
关键词
diagnostic accuracy; gold standard evaluation; latent class models; mean imputation; multiple tests; partial verification; prevalence; semilatent class models; sensitivity; specificity; verification bias;
D O I
10.1111/j.1541-0420.2006.00734.x
中图分类号
Q [生物科学];
学科分类号
07 ; 0710 ; 09 ;
摘要
Interest often focuses on estimating sensitivity and specificity of a group of raters or a set of new diagnostic tests in situations in which gold standard evaluation is expensive or invasive. Various authors have proposed semilatent class modeling approaches for estimating diagnostic accuracy in this situation. This article presents imputation approaches for this problem. I show how imputation provides a simpler way of performing diagnostic accuracy and prevalence estimation than the use of semilatent modeling. Furthermore, the imputation approach is more robust to modeling assumptions and, in general, there is only a moderate efficiency loss relative to a correctly specified semilatent class model. I apply imputation to a study designed to estimate the diagnostic accuracy of digital radiography for gastric cancer. The feasibility and robustness of imputation is illustrated with analysis, asymptotic results, and simulations.
引用
收藏
页码:947 / 957
页数:11
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
ALBERT PS, 2007, IN PRESS J AM STAT A
[2]   Assessing accuracy of a continuous screening test in the presence of verification bias [J].
Alonzo, TA ;
Pepe, MS .
JOURNAL OF THE ROYAL STATISTICAL SOCIETY SERIES C-APPLIED STATISTICS, 2005, 54 :173-190
[3]   Estimating disease prevalence in two-phase studies [J].
Alonzo, TA ;
Pepe, MS ;
Lumley, T .
BIOSTATISTICS, 2003, 4 (02) :313-326
[4]   EVALUATING MULTIPLE DIAGNOSTIC-TESTS - WITH PARTIAL VERIFICATION [J].
BAKER, SG .
BIOMETRICS, 1995, 51 (01) :330-337
[5]   ASSESSMENT OF DIAGNOSTIC-TESTS WHEN DISEASE VERIFICATION IS SUBJECT TO SELECTION BIAS [J].
BEGG, CB ;
GREENES, RA .
BIOMETRICS, 1983, 39 (01) :207-215
[6]  
Efron B., 1993, INTRO BOOTSTRAP MONO, DOI DOI 10.1201/9780429246593
[7]  
Gao SJ, 2000, STAT MED, V19, P2101, DOI 10.1002/1097-0258(20000830)19:16<2101::AID-SIM523>3.0.CO
[8]  
2-G
[9]   Misspecified maximum likelihood estimates and generalised linear mixed models [J].
Heagerty, PJ ;
Kurland, BF .
BIOMETRIKA, 2001, 88 (04) :973-985
[10]   Diagnosis of gastric cancers: Comparison of conventional radiography and digital radiography with a 4 million-pixel charge-coupled device [J].
Iinuma, G ;
Ushio, K ;
Ishikawa, T ;
Nawano, S ;
Sekiguchi, R ;
Satake, M .
RADIOLOGY, 2000, 214 (02) :497-502