Optimising sensor pitch for magnetic flux leakage imaging systems

被引:1
|
作者
Murshudov, R. [1 ]
Watson, J. M. [1 ]
Liang, C. W. [1 ]
Sexton, J. [1 ]
Missous, M. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Dept Elect & Elect Engn, Manchester M13 9PL, Lancs, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
OPTIMIZATION;
D O I
10.1784/insi.2021.63.7.416
中图分类号
TH7 [仪器、仪表];
学科分类号
0804 ; 080401 ; 081102 ;
摘要
Sensor arrays can significantly increase the speed at which inspections and subsequent imaging of flaws is performed([1]). This work focuses on developing a software approach for optimising the spacing between quantum well Hall-effect (QWHE) magnetic sensors used for magnetic flux leakage (MFL) imaging, where this approach could be adapted for any non-destructive evaluation (NDE) technique in which imaging is obtained. A ground mild steel weld sample containing two surface-breaking flaws prepared by Sonaspection was scanned using an XYZ MFL imaging system developed at the University of Manchester([2,3,13,14]). The scan was taken with an autonomously controlled lift-off height of 0.75 mm, with an x-y measurement step of 100 mu m and an applied magnetic field of 30 mT root mean square (RMS) at a frequency of 400 Hz. This data (ie magnetic image) was then processed to simulate different measurement step sizes, to determine any relationship between step size and flaw detectability (flaw signal to weld background response). This work effectively simulates different sensor pitches (separation between sensors) of integrated QWHE sensor arrays from 100 mu m to 5 mm, with the goal of determining both the minimum number of sensors required in the array and the optimal spacing to maximise scan speeds and help determine optimum inspection parameters to develop the technology of low-power MFL imaging. This optimisation process could be applied to any NDE imaging system (electromagnetic or other) currently used, with results dependent on the inspection parameters.
引用
收藏
页码:416 / 421
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Tubing thread inspection by magnetic flux leakage
    Ding, JF
    Kang, YH
    Wu, XJ
    NDT & E INTERNATIONAL, 2006, 39 (01) : 53 - 56
  • [42] Invariance transformations for magnetic flux leakage signals
    Mandayam, S
    Udpa, L
    Udpa, SS
    Lord, W
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 1996, 32 (03) : 1577 - 1580
  • [43] Invariance transformations for magnetic flux leakage signals
    Iowa State Univ, Ames, United States
    IEEE Trans Magn, 3 /1 (1577-1580):
  • [44] Magnetic Flux Leakage Testing for Defect Characterization
    Cheng, Weiying
    Kamiyama, Yoshinori
    Tsukada, Keiji
    ELECTROMAGNETIC NONDESTRUCTIVE EVALUATION (XIX), 2016, 41 : 126 - 133
  • [45] Magnetic design of a flux leakage assembly for pipes
    Mackintosh, D
    Schmidt, M
    Claveria, C
    Carey, T
    Moorhouse, G
    MATERIALS EVALUATION, 2005, 63 (03) : 329 - 334
  • [46] A model for magnetic flux leakage signal predictions
    Mandache, C
    Clapham, L
    JOURNAL OF PHYSICS D-APPLIED PHYSICS, 2003, 36 (20) : 2427 - 2431
  • [47] A Review of Magnetic Flux Leakage Nondestructive Testing
    Feng, Bo
    Wu, Jianbo
    Tu, Hongming
    Tang, Jian
    Kang, Yihua
    MATERIALS, 2022, 15 (20)
  • [48] Parametric design methodology for yoke-magnetization in magnetic flux leakage detection systems
    Lam, Quoc Minh
    Duong, Van Tu
    Phan, Hoang Long
    Nguyen, Tan Tien
    Nguyen, Huy Hung
    RESULTS IN ENGINEERING, 2024, 23
  • [49] Design of a Patterned Soft Magnetic Structure to Reduce Magnetic Flux Leakage of Magnetic Induction Wireless Power Transfer Systems
    Lee, In-Gon
    Kim, Nam
    Cho, In-Kui
    Hong, Ic-Pyo
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ELECTROMAGNETIC COMPATIBILITY, 2017, 59 (06) : 1856 - 1863
  • [50] Magnetic Dipole Moment Modeling in Magnetic Flux Leakage Testing
    Heo, Chang Geun
    Park, Gwan Soo
    TWENTIETH BIENNIAL IEEE CONFERENCE ON ELECTROMAGNETIC FIELD COMPUTATION (IEEE CEFC 2022), 2022,