Automated video monitoring of insect pollinators in the field

被引:34
|
作者
Pegoraro, Luca [1 ,2 ]
Hidalgo, Oriane [1 ,3 ]
Leitch, Ilia J. [1 ]
Pellicer, Jaume [1 ,4 ]
Barlow, Sarah E. [5 ]
机构
[1] Kew, Royal Bot Gardens, Comparat Plant & Fungal Biol Dept, Richmond TW9 3AB, Surrey, England
[2] Queen Mary Univ London, Organismal Biol Dept, Mile End Rd, London E1 4NS, England
[3] Univ Barcelona, Lab Bot, Fac Farm Ciencies Alimentacio, Ave Joan XXII 27-31, Barcelona 08028, Spain
[4] CSIC Ajuntament Barcelona, Inst Bot Barcelona IBB, Dept Biodiversitat, Passeig Migdia Sn, Barcelona 08038, Spain
[5] Univ Utah, Red Butte Garden & Arboretum, Salt Lake City, UT 84108 USA
关键词
IDENTIFICATION; ORCHID; PLANTS;
D O I
10.1042/ETLS20190074
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Ecosystems are at increasing risk from the global pollination crisis. Gaining better knowledge about pollinators and their interactions with plants is an urgent need. However, conventional methods of manually recording pollinator activity in the field can be time- and cost-consuming in terms of labour. Field-deployable video recording systems have become more common in ecological studies as they enable the capture of plant-insect interactions in fine detail. Standard video recording can be effective, although there are issues with hardware reliability under field-conditions (e.g. weatherproofing), and reviewing raw video manually is a time-consuming task. Automated video monitoring systems based on motion detection partly overcome these issues by only recording when activity occurs hence reducing the time needed to review footage during post-processing. Another advantage of these systems is that the hardware has relatively low power requirements. A few systems have been tested in the field which permit the collection of large datasets. Compared with other systems, automated monitoring allows vast increases in sampling at broad spatiotemporal scales. Some tools such as post-recording computer vision software and data-import scripts exist, further reducing users' time spent processing and analysing the data. Integrated computer vision and automated species recognition using machine learning models have great potential to further the study of pollinators in the field. Together, it is predicted that future advances in technology-based field monitoring methods will contribute significantly to understanding the causes underpinning pollinator declines and, hence, developing effective solutions for dealing with this global challenge.
引用
收藏
页码:87 / 97
页数:11
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] AN AUTOMATED STRUCTURAL HEALTH MONITORING SYSTEM
    Hasan, Zeaid
    Hasweh, Fares
    Abu Al-Nadi, Omar
    Atmeh, Ghassan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE ASME INTERNATIONAL MECHANICAL ENGINEERING CONGRESS AND EXPOSITION, 2011, VOL 7, PTS A AND B, 2012, : 991 - 1001
  • [22] Oilseed rape (Brassica napus) as a resource for farmland insect pollinators: quantifying floral traits in conventional varieties and breeding systems
    Carruthers, Jonathan M.
    Cook, Samantha M.
    Wright, Geraldine A.
    Osborne, Juliet L.
    Clark, Suzanne J.
    Swain, Jennifer L.
    Haughton, Alison J.
    GLOBAL CHANGE BIOLOGY BIOENERGY, 2017, 9 (08): : 1370 - 1379
  • [23] Automatic Detection and Monitoring of Insect Pests-A Review
    Cardim Ferreira Lima, Matheus
    Damascena de Almeida Leandro, Maria Elisa
    Valero, Constantino
    Pereira Coronel, Luis Carlos
    Goncalves Bazzo, Clara Oliva
    AGRICULTURE-BASEL, 2020, 10 (05):
  • [24] Identifying key knowledge needs for evidence-based conservation of wild insect pollinators: a collaborative cross-sectoral exercise
    Dicks, Lynn V.
    Abrahams, Andrew
    Atkinson, John
    Biesmeijer, Jacobus
    Bourn, Nigel
    Brown, Chris
    Brown, Mark J. F.
    Carvell, Claire
    Connolly, Chris
    Cresswell, James E.
    Croft, Pat
    Darvill, Ben
    De Zylva, Paul
    Effingham, Philip
    Fountain, Michelle
    Goggin, Anthony
    Harding, Debbie
    Harding, Tony
    Hartfield, Chris
    Heard, Matthew S.
    Heathcote, Richard
    Heaver, David
    Holland, John
    Howe, Mike
    Hughes, Brin
    Huxley, Theresa
    Kunin, William E.
    Little, Julian
    Mason, Caroline
    Memmott, Jane
    Osborne, Juliet
    Pankhurst, Tim
    Paxton, Robert J.
    Pocock, Michael J. O.
    Potts, Simon G.
    Power, Eileen F.
    Raine, Nigel E.
    Ranelagh, Elizabeth
    Roberts, Stuart
    Saunders, Rob
    Smith, Katie
    Smith, Richard M.
    Sutton, Peter
    Tilley, Luke A. N.
    Tinsley, Andrew
    Tonhasca, Athayde
    Vanbergen, Adam J.
    Webster, Sarah
    Wilson, Alan
    Sutherland, William J.
    INSECT CONSERVATION AND DIVERSITY, 2013, 6 (03) : 435 - 446
  • [25] Insect pollinators can unlock an annual monetary value of more than US $100 million from crop production in Rwanda
    Yocgo, Rosita Endah Epse
    Hitimana, Isaac
    Hakizimana, Malachie
    Birachi, Eliud Abucheli
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2023, 13 (01)
  • [26] Monitoring insect pest infestation via different spectroscopic techniques
    Ahmad, Mohd Najib
    Shariff, Abdul Rashid Mohamed
    Moslim, Ramle
    APPLIED SPECTROSCOPY REVIEWS, 2018, 53 (10) : 836 - 853
  • [27] Automated Video-Based Analysis Framework for Behavior Monitoring of Individual Animals in Zoos Using Deep Learning-A Study on Polar Bears
    Zuerl, Matthias
    Stoll, Philip
    Brehm, Ingrid
    Raab, Rene
    Zanca, Dario
    Kabri, Samira
    Happold, Johanna
    Nille, Heiko
    Prechtel, Katharina
    Wuensch, Sophie
    Krause, Marie
    Seegerer, Stefan
    von Fersen, Lorenzo
    Eskofier, Bjoern
    ANIMALS, 2022, 12 (06):
  • [28] Automated garden-insect recognition using improved lightweight convolution network
    Yang, Zhankui
    Yang, Xinting
    Li, Ming
    Li, Wenyong
    INFORMATION PROCESSING IN AGRICULTURE, 2023, 10 (02): : 256 - 266
  • [29] Automating insect monitoring using unsupervised near-infrared sensors
    Rydhmer, Klas
    Bick, Emily
    Still, Laurence
    Strand, Alfred
    Luciano, Rubens
    Helmreich, Salena
    Beck, Brittany D.
    Gronne, Christoffer
    Malmros, Ludvig
    Poulsen, Knud
    Elbaek, Frederik
    Brydegaard, Mikkel
    Lemmich, Jesper
    Nikolajsen, Thomas
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [30] Insect pest monitoring with camera-equipped traps: strengths and limitations
    Preti, Michele
    Verheggen, Francois
    Angeli, Sergio
    JOURNAL OF PEST SCIENCE, 2021, 94 (02) : 203 - 217