ASSESSING US GLOBAL TAX COMPETITIVENESS AFTER TAX REFORM

被引:3
作者
Lyon, Andrew B. [1 ]
McBride, William A. [1 ]
机构
[1] PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, Washington, DC 20005 USA
关键词
tax reform; corporate income taxation; multinational corporations; INVESTMENT INCENTIVES; POLICY;
D O I
10.17310/ntj.2018.4.08
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
This paper assesses the impacts of the 2017 tax reform act on US. competitiveness in terms of changes in incentives for US. domestic corporate investment and the taxation of US.-headquartered companies and their foreign subsidiaries relative to foreign-headquartered companies. The reduction of the US. statutory tax rate has significantly improved domestic investment incentives as measured by marginal and average effective tax rates, assuming an average use of debt and equity. In addition, the partial adoption of a participation exemption system in some cases can allow US companies now to compete globally on equal tax terms with foreign-headquartered companies. However, a new US. global minimum tax imposes current taxation on certain foreign income previously eligible for deferral and, as a result, may disfavor US. ownership of high-return foreign assets relative to foreign-headquartered companies. Average effective tax rates are also reduced by a new domestic incentive for undertaking high-return investments in the United States. Even so, US. research incentives continue to lag behind those available in many other major countries, taking into account special deductions, tax credits, and patent box regimes.
引用
收藏
页码:751 / 788
页数:38
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Make Athletes Pay More Again: An Analysis of Jock Tax Issues following the 2017 US Tax Reform [J].
Williams, Dylan P. ;
Slavich, Mark .
JOURNAL OF GLOBAL SPORT MANAGEMENT, 2023, 8 (01) :302-321
[22]   Structural tax reform and local government non-tax revenues - evidence from rural tax reform of China [J].
Wang, Long ;
Liu, Xiaoqian ;
Liu, Ruiwen ;
Pan, Junyu .
APPLIED ECONOMICS, 2025, 57 (21) :2649-2664
[23]   Assessing indirect tax reform in a tourism-dependent developing country [J].
Gooroochurn, N ;
Milner, C .
WORLD DEVELOPMENT, 2005, 33 (07) :1183-1200
[24]   UNIQUE TAX CREDIT AND NEGATIVE INCOME TAX TO REFORM THE ITALIAN PERSONAL INCOME TAX [J].
Loiacono, Luisa ;
Rizzo, Leonzio ;
Secomandi, Riccardo .
POLITICA ECONOMICA, 2021, 37 (02) :253-268
[25]   Anticipating tax changes:: Evidence from the Finnish corporate income tax reform of 2005 [J].
Kari, Seppo ;
Karikallio, Hanna ;
Pirttila, Jukka .
FISCAL STUDIES, 2008, 29 (02) :167-196
[26]   Business tax to value-added tax reform in China [J].
Wang, Zhiyuan ;
Singh-Ladhar, Jagdeep ;
Davey, Howard .
PACIFIC ACCOUNTING REVIEW, 2019, 31 (04) :602-625
[27]   Tax reform and the underground economy: a long-term global perspective [J].
Jung, Hoyong .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC POLICY REFORM, 2025, 28 (02) :103-118
[28]   Comprehensive Tax Reform in Jamaica [J].
Bahl, Roy ;
Wallace, Sally .
PUBLIC FINANCE REVIEW, 2007, 35 (01) :4-25
[29]   The German tax reform of 2000 [J].
Keen, M .
INTERNATIONAL TAX AND PUBLIC FINANCE, 2002, 9 (05) :603-621
[30]   The Tax Reform Agenda in Australia [J].
Eccleston, Richard .
AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION, 2013, 72 (02) :103-113