Outcome of in vitro fertilization treatment in patients who electively inseminate a limited number of oocytes to avoid creating surplus human embryos for cryopreservation

被引:4
作者
Engmann, L [1 ]
Siano, L [1 ]
Schmidt, D [1 ]
Benadiva, C [1 ]
Maier, D [1 ]
Nulsen, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Connecticut, Ctr Hlth, Ctr Adv Reprod Serv, Dept Obstet & Gynecol,Div Reprod Endocrinol & Inf, Farmington, CT 06030 USA
关键词
limited insemination of oocytes; cryopreservation; in-vitro fertilization; poor responders; avoiding surplus embryos;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.05.025
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objective: To determine whether the outcome of IVF treatment in patients who electively inseminate a limited number of oocytes is comparable to that in a group of good prognostic or poor prognostic patients. Design: Retrospective clinical study. Setting: University-based tertiary fertility center. Patient(s): Two hundred three women under the age of 40 years. Intervention(s): Patients undergoing their first cycle of IVF who elected to have no more than four oocytes inseminated (study group) or who produced only four or fewer oocytes (poor prognostic group) or who had excess embryos cryopreserved (good-prognostic group). Main Outcome Measure(s): Implantation rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and ongoing pregnancy rate. Result(s): There were no significant differences in the implantation rate for the study group when compared with the good-prognostic group or the poor-prognostic group. The clinical pregnancy rate (62.5% vs. 64%) and ongoing-pregnancy or birth rate (56.3% vs. 60.7%) were similar between the study group and the good-prognostic group. However, the clinical pregnancy rate (62.5% vs. 29.7%) and ongoing-pregnancy rate (56.3% vs. 24.3%) were higher in the study group compared with the poor-prognostic group. Conclusion(s): Inseminating fewer oocytes in patients who elect not to cryopreserve embryos does not adversely affect their probability of conception.
引用
收藏
页码:1406 / 1410
页数:5
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   When to avoid creating surplus human embryos [J].
Biggers, JD ;
Summers, MC .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2004, 19 (11) :2457-2459
[2]  
CUMMINS J M, 1986, Journal of In Vitro Fertilization and Embryo Transfer, V3, P284, DOI 10.1007/BF01133388
[3]   NATURAL CYCLES FOR IN-VITRO FERTILIZATION - COST-EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS AND FACTORS INFLUENCING OUTCOME [J].
DAYA, S ;
GUNBY, J ;
HUGHES, EG ;
COLLINS, JA ;
SAGLE, MA ;
YOUNGLAI, EV .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1995, 10 (07) :1719-1724
[4]   Selection of good embryos for transfer depends on embryo cohort size: implications for the 'mild ovarian stimulation' debate [J].
Devreker, F ;
Pogonici, E ;
De Maertelaer, V ;
Revelard, P ;
Van den Bergh, M ;
Englert, Y .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1999, 14 (12) :3002-3008
[5]   THE PROGNOSTIC IMPORTANCE OF THE NUMBER OF OOCYTES RETRIEVED AND ESTRADIOL LEVELS IN POOR AND NORMAL RESPONDERS IN INVITRO FERTILIZATION (IVF) TREATMENT [J].
DOR, J ;
SEIDMAN, DS ;
BENSHLOMO, I ;
LEVRAN, D ;
KARASIK, A ;
MASHIACH, S .
JOURNAL OF ASSISTED REPRODUCTION AND GENETICS, 1992, 9 (03) :228-232
[6]   Trends in the incidence of births and multiple births and the factors that determine the probability of multiple birth after IVF treatment [J].
Engmann, L ;
Maconochie, N ;
Tan, SL ;
Bekir, J .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2001, 16 (12) :2598-2605
[7]   Good results of milder form of ovarian stimulation in an in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection program [J].
Grochowski, D ;
Wolczynski, S ;
Kuczynski, W ;
Domitrz, J ;
Szamatowicz, J ;
Szamatowicz, M .
GYNECOLOGICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY, 1999, 13 (05) :297-304
[8]   COMPARISON OF POOR RESPONDERS WITH GOOD RESPONDERS USING A STANDARD BUSERELIN HUMAN MENOPAUSAL GONADOTROPIN REGIME FOR INVITRO FERTILIZATION [J].
JENKINS, JM ;
DAVIES, DW ;
DEVONPORT, H ;
ANTHONY, FW ;
GADD, SC ;
WATSON, RH ;
MASSON, GM .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 1991, 6 (07) :918-921
[9]   High-dose human menopausal gonadotropin stimulation in poor responders does not improve in vitro fertilization outcome [J].
Land, JA ;
Yarmolinskaya, MI ;
Dumoulin, JCM ;
Evers, JLH .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1996, 65 (05) :961-965
[10]   Efficacy of natural cycle IVF: a review of the literature [J].
Pelinck, MJ ;
Hoek, A ;
Simons, AHM ;
Heineman, MJ .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION UPDATE, 2002, 8 (02) :129-139