Historical and potential future contributions of power technologies to global warming

被引:7
作者
Lenzen, Manfred [1 ]
Schaeffer, Roberto [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Sydney, Sch Phys A28, ISA, Sydney, NSW 2006, Australia
[2] Univ Fed Rio de Janeiro, COPPE, Energy Planning Program, Ctr Tecnol,Ilha Fundao, BR-21941972 Rio De Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
关键词
GREENHOUSE-GAS EMISSIONS; LIFE-CYCLE ASSESSMENT; ELECTRICITY PRODUCTION; IMPACT ASSESSMENT; CARBON CAPTURE; NUCLEAR-POWER; WIND TURBINES; CO2; EMISSIONS; END-POINTS; ENERGY;
D O I
10.1007/s10584-011-0270-y
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Using the mathematical formalism of the Brazilian Proposal to the IPCC, we analyse eight power technologies with regard to their past and potential future contributions to global warming. Taking into account detailed bottom-up technology characteristics we define the mitigation potential of each technology in terms of avoided temperature increase by comparing a "coal-only" reference scenario and an alternative low-carbon scenario. Future mitigation potentials are mainly determined by the magnitude of installed capacity and the temporal deployment profile. A general conclusion is that early technology deployment matters, at least within a period of 50-100 years. Our results conclusively show that avoided temperature increase is a better proxy for comparing technologies with regard to their impact on climate change, and that numerous short-term comparisons based on annual or even cumulative emissions may be misleading. Thus, our results support and extend the policy relevance of the Brazilian Proposal in the sense that not only comparisons between countries, but also comparisons between technologies could be undertaken on the basis of avoided temperature increase rather than on the basis of annual emissions as is practiced today.
引用
收藏
页码:601 / 632
页数:32
相关论文
共 115 条
  • [91] Consequential environmental system analysis of expected offshore wind electricity production in Germany
    Pehnt, Martin
    Oeser, Michael
    Swider, Derk J.
    [J]. ENERGY, 2008, 33 (05) : 747 - 759
  • [92] Life cycle assessment of carbon dioxide capture and storage from lignite power plants
    Pehnt, Martin
    Henkel, Johannes
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GREENHOUSE GAS CONTROL, 2009, 3 (01) : 49 - 66
  • [93] Life cycle impacts and costs of photovoltaic systems: Current state of the art and future outlooks
    Raugei, Marco
    Frankl, Paolo
    [J]. ENERGY, 2009, 34 (03) : 392 - 399
  • [94] Potentials and prospects for renewable energies at global scale
    Resch, Gustav
    Held, Anne
    Faber, Thomas
    Panzer, Christian
    Toro, Felipe
    Haas, Reinhard
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2008, 36 (11) : 4048 - 4056
  • [95] Riahi K., 2005, GREENHOUSE GAS CONTR, V7, P921
  • [96] Comments on the Brazilian Proposal and contributions to global temperature increase with different climate responses -: CO2 emissions due to fossil fuels, CO2 emissions due to land use change
    Rosa, LP
    Ribeiro, SK
    Muylaert, MS
    de Campos, CP
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2004, 32 (13) : 1499 - 1510
  • [97] GLOBAL WARMING POTENTIALS - THE CASE OF EMISSIONS FROM DAMS
    ROSA, LP
    SCHAEFFER, R
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 1995, 23 (02) : 149 - 158
  • [98] Roth H, 2005, LFE SCHRIFTENREIHE
  • [99] Cost and performance of fossil fuel power plants with CO2 capture and storage
    Rubin, Edward S.
    Chen, Chao
    Rao, Anand B.
    [J]. ENERGY POLICY, 2007, 35 (09) : 4444 - 4454
  • [100] Current status, prospects and economic framework of geothermal power production in Germany
    Sanner, B
    Bussmann, W
    [J]. GEOTHERMICS, 2003, 32 (4-6) : 429 - 438