Long-acting insulin analogue detemir compared with NPH insulin in type 1 diabetes A systematic review and meta-analysis

被引:26
作者
Szypowska, Agnieszka [1 ]
Golicki, Dominik [2 ]
Groele, Lidia [1 ]
Pankowska, Ewa [3 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Warsaw, Dept Paediat, Warsaw, Poland
[2] Med Univ Warsaw, Dept Pharmacoecon, Warsaw, Poland
[3] Inst Mother & Child Hlth, Warsaw, Poland
来源
POLSKIE ARCHIWUM MEDYCYNY WEWNETRZNEJ-POLISH ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE | 2011年 / 121卷 / 7-8期
关键词
basal-bolus therapy; detemir; fasting plasma glucose; HbA(1c); NPH insulin; BASAL-BOLUS REGIMEN; NEUTRAL PROTAMINE HAGEDORN; IMPROVED GLYCEMIC CONTROL; BLOOD-GLUCOSE CONTROL; PHARMACOKINETIC PROFILE; NOCTURNAL HYPOGLYCEMIA; TERM EFFICACY; REDUCED RISK; STEADY-STATE; DOUBLE-BLIND;
D O I
10.20452/pamw.1065
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Introduction Although numerous studies showed an improvement in glycemic control in type 1 diabetic patients treated with long-acting insulin analogue detemir compared with Neutral Protamine Hagedorn (NPH) insulin, the beneficial effects of insulin detemir has not been confirmed by all investigators. Objectives The aim of the study was to compare the effect of treatment with detemir insulin vs. NPH insulin on metabolic control, hypoglycemic episodes, and body weight gain in patients with type 1 diabetes by means of a systematic review and a meta-analysis. Methods The following electronic databases were searched up to November 2010: MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. Additional references were obtained from the reviewed articles. Only randomized controlled trials of at least 12-week duration with basal-bolus regimen therapies using detemir insulin vs. NPH insulin were included. Results The analysis included 10 studies involving 3825 patients with type 1 diabetes. Combined data from all trials showed a statistically significant reduction in hemoglobin A(1c) (HbA(1c)) (weighted mean difference: [WMD] -0.073, 95% CI -0.135 to -0.011, P = 0.021) in the detemir group compared with the NPH group. There was also a significant reduction of fasting plasma glucose (FPG) (WMD -0.977 mmol/l, 95% CI -1.395 to -0.558, P <0.001), all-day hypoglycemic episodes (relative risk [RR] 0.978, 95% CI 0.961-0.996), severe hypoglycemic episodes (RR 0.665, 95% CI 0.547-0.810), nocturnal hypoglycemic episodes (RR 0.877, 95% CI 0.816-0.942), as well as smaller body weight gain (WMD -0.779 kg, 95% CI -0.992 to -0.567) in patients using detemir insulin compared with those using NPH insulin. Conclusions Basal-bolus treatment with insulin detemir, as compared with NPH insulin, provided a minor benefit in terms of the HbA(1c) value and significantly reduced FPG in type 1 diabetic patients. Treatment with detemir insulin was also superior to NPH insulin in reducing the risk of all-day, nocturnal, and severe hypoglycemic episodes, with the added benefit of reduced weight gain.
引用
收藏
页码:237 / 246
页数:10
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [11] Safety and efficacy of insulin detemir basal-bolus therapy in type 1 diabetes patients:: 14-week data from the European cohort of the PREDICTIVE study
    Dornhorst, Anne
    Lueddeke, Hans-Joachim
    Honka, Marek
    Ackermann, Ralf W.
    Merilaeinen, Markus
    Gailwitz, Baptist
    Sreenan, Seamus
    [J]. CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 2008, 24 (02) : 369 - 376
  • [12] The role of "metabolic memory" in the natural history of diabetes mellitus
    Drzewoski, Jozef
    Kasznicki, Jacek
    Trojanowski, Zygmunt
    [J]. POLSKIE ARCHIWUM MEDYCYNY WEWNETRZNEJ-POLISH ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2009, 119 (7-8): : 493 - 499
  • [13] Insulin Analogs: Impact on Treatment Success, Satisfaction, Quality of Life, and Adherence
    Hartman, Israel
    [J]. CLINICAL MEDICINE & RESEARCH, 2008, 6 (02) : 54 - 67
  • [14] The mechanism of protraction of insulin detemir, a long-acting, acylated analog of human insulin
    Havelund, S
    Plum, A
    Ribel, U
    Jonassen, I
    Volund, A
    Markussen, J
    Kurtzhals, P
    [J]. PHARMACEUTICAL RESEARCH, 2004, 21 (08) : 1498 - 1504
  • [15] Lower within-subject variability of insulin detemir in comparison to NPH insulin and insulin glargine in people with type 1 diabetes
    Heise, T
    Nosek, L
    Ronn, BB
    Endahl, L
    Heinemann, L
    Kapitza, C
    Draeger, E
    [J]. DIABETES, 2004, 53 (06) : 1614 - 1620
  • [16] Insulin analogues (insulin detemir and insulin aspart) versus traditional human insulins (NPH insulin and regular human insulin) in basal-bolus therapy for patients with Type 1 diabetes
    Hermansen, K
    Fontaine, P
    Kukolja, KK
    Peterkova, V
    Leth, G
    Gall, MA
    [J]. DIABETOLOGIA, 2004, 47 (04) : 622 - 629
  • [17] Comparison of the soluble basal insulin analog insulin detemir with NPH insulin - A randomized open crossover trial in type 1 diabetic subjects on basal-bolus therapy
    Hermansen, K
    Madsbad, S
    Perrild, H
    Kristensen, A
    Axelsen, M
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2001, 24 (02) : 296 - 301
  • [18] Difficulties in interpreting HbA1c results
    Homa, Katarzyna
    Majkowska, Liliana
    [J]. POLSKIE ARCHIWUM MEDYCYNY WEWNETRZNEJ-POLISH ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2010, 120 (04): : 148 - 154
  • [19] Insulin detemir offers improved glycemic control compared with NPH insulin in people with type 1 diabetes - A randomized clinical trial
    Home, P
    Bartley, P
    Russell-Jones, D
    Hanaire-Broutin, H
    Heeg, JE
    Abrams, P
    Landin-Olsson, M
    Hylleberg, B
    Lang, H
    Draeger, E
    [J]. DIABETES CARE, 2004, 27 (05) : 1081 - 1087
  • [20] A randomized multicentre trial of insulin glargine compared with NPH insulin in people with type 1 diabetes
    Home, PD
    Rosskamp, R
    Forjanic-Klapproth, J
    Dressler, A
    [J]. DIABETES-METABOLISM RESEARCH AND REVIEWS, 2005, 21 (06) : 545 - 553