Graves, ruins, and belonging: towards an anthropology of proximity

被引:63
作者
Fontein, Joost [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Edinburgh, Sch Social & Polit Sci, CMB, Edinburgh EH8 9LD, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
PATRIOTIC HISTORY; POLITICS; LAND; REFLECTIONS; JAMBANJA; IDENTITY; ZIMBABWE; AFRICANS; WATER;
D O I
10.1111/j.1467-9655.2011.01715.x
中图分类号
Q98 [人类学];
学科分类号
030303 ;
摘要
This article uses ethnographic material collected around Lake Mutirikwi in southern Zimbabwe, to explore how the affective presence of graves and ruins, which materialize past and present occupations and engagements with/ in the landscape ( by different clans, colonial and postcolonial state institutions, war veterans, chiefs, and spirit mediums, as well as white commercial farmers), are entangled in complex, localized contests over autochthony and belonging, even as they are finely implicated in wider reconfigurations of authority and state- craft. Situating these highly contested assertions, discourses, and practices in the context of national redefinitions of citizenship and belonging articulated by ZANU PF's rhetoric of ` patriotic history', this article explores how these contests are made real through the consequential materiality of milieu. Although the central hook will be the prominent role that graves, both ancestral ` mapa' and recent burials, have played in ongoing claims to land and authority, its main perspective will be on how different, overlapping, and intertwined notions of belonging are enabled, constrained, and structured through the materiality of place, thereby emphasizing the proximity of discourses and practices of belonging that derives from the shared nature of material landscapes. In this vein, the ruins and graves of past white occupation and interventions in the landscape comingle and coexist with the resurgent appeals of local clans to ancestral territories on occupied lands. The broader theoretical purpose of the article is to engage with recent debates over materiality and anthropology's so- called ` ontological turn' to make a case for focusing less on ` radical ontological difference' and more on material, historical, and conceptual proximities.
引用
收藏
页码:706 / 727
页数:22
相关论文
共 75 条
[71]  
Shipton Parker., 2009, MORTGAGING ANCESTORS
[72]   Imperial debris: Reflections on ruins and ruination [J].
Stoler, Ann Laura .
CULTURAL ANTHROPOLOGY, 2008, 23 (02) :191-219
[73]   Introduction - Identity, place, landscape and heritage [J].
Tilley, Christopher .
JOURNAL OF MATERIAL CULTURE, 2006, 11 (1-2) :7-32
[74]  
Werbner Richard., 1998, Memory and the Postcolony
[75]  
Williams Raymond., 1977, MARXISM LIT