A theoretical framework for managing the new product development portfolio: When and how to use strategic buckets

被引:145
作者
Chao, Raul O. [1 ]
Kavadias, Stylianos [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Virginia, Darden Sch Business, Charlottesville, VA 22903 USA
[2] Georgia Inst Technol, Coll Management, Atlanta, GA 30338 USA
关键词
new product development; NPD portfolio strategy; incremental innovation; radical innovation; strategic buckets; complex systems; evolutionary systems;
D O I
10.1287/mnsc.1070.0828
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
Developing the "right" new products is critical to firm success and is often cited as a key competitive dimension. This paper explores new product development (NPD) portfolio strategy and the balance between incremental and radical innovation. We characterize innovative effort through a normative theoretical framework that addresses a popular practice in NPD portfolio management: the use of strategic buckets. Strategic buckets encourage the division of the overall NPD resource budget into smaller, more focused budgets that are defined by the type of innovative effort (incremental or radical). We show that time commitment determines the balance between incremental and radical innovation. When managers execute this balance, they are often confounded by (i) environmental complexity, defined as the number of unknown interdependencies among technology and market parameters that determine product performance; and (ii) environmental instability, the probability of changes to the underlying performance functions. Although both of these factors confound managers, we find that they have completely opposite effects on the NPD portfolio balance. Environmental complexity shifts the balance toward radical innovation. Conversely, environmental instability shifts the balance toward incremental innovation. Risk considerations and implications for theory and practice are also discussed.
引用
收藏
页码:907 / 921
页数:15
相关论文
共 46 条
[22]  
Loch, 2000, EUROPEAN MANAGEMENT, V18, P246, DOI DOI 10.1016/S0263-2373(00)00007-4
[23]   Dynamic portfolio selection of NPD programs using marginal returns [J].
Loch, CH ;
Kavadias, S .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2002, 48 (10) :1227-1241
[24]   Selecting R&D projects at BMW: A case study of adopting mathematical programming models [J].
Loch, CH ;
Pich, MT ;
Terwiesch, C ;
Urbschat, M .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON ENGINEERING MANAGEMENT, 2001, 48 (01) :70-80
[25]  
Loch CH, 2007, HDB NEW PRODUCT DEV, P1
[26]  
Macready W. G., 1998, IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation, V2, P2, DOI 10.1109/4235.728210
[27]  
NELSON R., 1982, EVOL THEOR
[28]   How much does the market value an improvement in a product attribute? [J].
Ofek, E ;
Srinivasan, V .
MARKETING SCIENCE, 2002, 21 (04) :398-411
[29]   Balancing search and stability: Interdependencies among elements of organizational design [J].
Rivkin, JW ;
Siggelkow, N .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2003, 49 (03) :290-311
[30]   HOW TO MAKE A DECISION - THE ANALYTIC HIERARCHY PROCESS [J].
SAATY, TL .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 1990, 48 (01) :9-26