Comparison of the energy efficiency to produce agroethanol between various industries and processes: Synthesis

被引:3
作者
Chavanne, Xavier [1 ]
Frangi, Jean-Pierre [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Paris Diderot, Inst Phys Globe Paris, CNRS, UMR 7154, F-75013 Paris, France
关键词
Agroethanol; Energy efficiency; Farm; Transport; Processes; Electricity/gas productions; ETHANOL; YIELD;
D O I
10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.03.013
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
The article assesses the energy R required by a system to transform a cereal or sugar plant into ethanol. From the specific consumption r(j) of each process j and its weight w; in the system, process consumption share R-j is deduced and hence R, sum of R-j. Depending on w(j) definition, R-j and R are relative to either 100 J of ethanol produced or 100 J of plant harvested. Depending on the nature of r(j), R-j and R represent either only primary external energies, or all fuel and electricity consumed directly, or external and internal energies. From one definition to another R for average sugar cane based industries is the best or the worst relative to other plants. This results also from the use of cane residues as fuels while operating outdated processes. Through r(j) the process based analysis allows to examine for each system the impact of modern processes or different use of residues. All systems benefit except sugar beet based industry close to its best efficiency. This flexibility permits even to build a self-sufficient system where existing processes produce from system resources substitutes to external energies. R becomes an unambiguous definition of a system efficiency. It shows that all agroethanol systems are more consuming than petroleum industry. The system can be expanded to the vehicle stage to compare with alternatives to ethanol such as electricity and biogas. Wheat straw burnt to produce electricity used in an electrical vehicle will present R close to that of petroleum industry. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:2737 / 2754
页数:18
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   Comparison of the energy efficiency to produce agroethanol between various industries and processes: The transport stage [J].
Chavanne, Xavier ;
Frangi, Jean-Pierre .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2011, 35 (09) :4075-4091
[2]   Contrasting energy efficiency in various ceramic sintering processes [J].
Heidary, Damoon Sohrabi Baba ;
Lanagan, Michael ;
Randall, Clive A. .
JOURNAL OF THE EUROPEAN CERAMIC SOCIETY, 2018, 38 (04) :1018-1029
[3]   Energy Efficiency and Industry 4.0 in Wood Industry: A Review and Comparison to Other Industries [J].
Haddouche, Mohamed ;
Ilinca, Adrian .
ENERGIES, 2022, 15 (07)
[4]   Comparison of environmental impact and energy efficiency of desalination processes by LCA [J].
Tarnacki, K. M. ;
Melin, T. ;
Jansen, A. E. ;
van Medevoort, J. .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY-WATER SUPPLY, 2011, 11 (02) :246-251
[5]   The energy efficiency of local food systems: A comparison between different modes of distribution [J].
Mundler, Patrick ;
Rumpus, Lucas .
FOOD POLICY, 2012, 37 (06) :609-615
[6]   Relationships between Selected Quality Tools and Energy Efficiency in Production Processes [J].
Daron, Marta ;
Gorska, Monika .
ENERGIES, 2023, 16 (13)
[7]   Membrane processes enhanced by various forms of physical energy: A systematic review on mechanisms, implementation, application and energy efficiency [J].
Shen, Yuxiang ;
Zhang, Yichong ;
Jiang, Yulian ;
Cheng, Haibo ;
Wang, Banglong ;
Wang, Hongyu .
SCIENCE OF THE TOTAL ENVIRONMENT, 2024, 906
[8]   Comparison of various milling modes combined to the enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosic biomass for bioenergy production: Glucose yield and energy efficiency [J].
Licari, A. ;
Monlau, F. ;
Solhy, A. ;
Buche, P. ;
Barakat, A. .
ENERGY, 2016, 102 :335-342
[9]   Framing energy efficiency and renewable energy policies: An international comparison between Mexico and China [J].
Valenzuela, Jose Maria ;
Qi, Ye .
ENERGY POLICY, 2012, 51 :128-137
[10]   A Comparison Between Industrial Energy Efficiency Measures in Guatemala and the United States [J].
Khosla, Radhika ;
Rodriguez, Angel Martinez ;
Milcarek, Ryan J. ;
Phelan, Patrick E. .
ENVIRONMENTS, 2025, 12 (01)