Minimally invasive versus conventional fixation of tracer in robot-assisted pedicle screw insertion surgery: a randomized control trial

被引:8
作者
Li Yongqi [1 ]
Zhang Dehua [1 ]
Wu Hongzi [1 ]
Zhang Ke [1 ]
Yang Rui [1 ]
Fang Zhou [1 ]
Wang Shaobo [1 ]
Liao Yi [1 ]
机构
[1] Karamay Cent Hosp, Dept Orthoped, Karamay 834000, Peoples R China
关键词
Modified; Minimally invasive; Tracer fixation; Robot; Pedicle screw placement; PLACEMENT; ACCURACY; FLUOROSCOPY; SPINE; SYSTEM;
D O I
10.1186/s12891-020-03239-9
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: This study evaluated the minimal invasiveness, safety, and accuracy of robot-assisted pedicle screw placement procedure using a modified tracer fixation device. Methods: Patients were randomly assigned to conventional fixation group (25 patients) and modified fixation group (27 patients). Results: No baseline statistical difference was observed between the groups (P > 0.05). The length of unnecessary incision, amount of bleeding, and fixation duration for tracer fixation respectively were 6.08 +/- 1.02 mm, 1.46 +/- 0.84 ml, and 1.56 +/- 0.32 min in the modified fixation group and 40.28 +/- 8.52 mm, 12.02 +/- 2.24 ml, and 5.08 +/- 1.06 min in the conventional group. The difference between both groups was significant (P < 0.05). However, no significant difference between the two groups was observed in terms of the accuracy of pedicle screw placement (P > 0.05). Conclusions: The modified minimally invasive procedure for tracer fixation results in minimal trauma and is simple, reliable, and highly safe. Additionally, the procedure does not compromise the accuracy of pedicle screw placement. Thus, it has great clinical applicable value.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]   Rate and mode of screw misplacements after 3D-fluoroscopy navigation-assisted insertion and 3D-imaging control of 1547 pedicle screws in spinal levels T10-S1 related to vertebrae and spinal sections [J].
Balling, Horst ;
Blattert, Thomas R. .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2017, 26 (11) :2898-2905
[2]   Error Analysis and Experimental Study of a Bi-Planar Parallel Mechanism in a Pedicle Screw Robot System [J].
Duan, Qingjuan ;
Du, Zhijiang ;
Yu, Hongjian ;
Wang, Yongfeng ;
Dong, Wei .
SENSORS, 2016, 16 (12)
[3]   Robot-assisted and conventional freehand pedicle screw placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials [J].
Gao, Shutao ;
Lv, Zhengtao ;
Fang, Huang .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2018, 27 (04) :921-930
[4]   ACCURACY OF PEDICULAR SCREW PLACEMENT INVIVO [J].
GERTZBEIN, SD ;
ROBBINS, SE .
SPINE, 1990, 15 (01) :11-14
[5]   A prospective, randomized, controlled trial of robot-assisted vs freehand pedicle screw fixation in spine surgery [J].
Kim, Ho-Joong ;
Jung, Whan-Ik ;
Chang, Bong-Soon ;
Lee, Choon-Ki ;
Kang, Kyoung-Tak ;
Yeom, Jin S. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2017, 13 (03)
[6]   An Assistive Image-Guided Surgical Robot System Using O-Arm Fluoroscopy for Pedicle Screw Insertion: Preliminary and Cadaveric Study [J].
Kim, Sungmin ;
Chung, Jaeheon ;
Yi, Byung-Ju ;
Kim, Young Soo .
NEUROSURGERY, 2010, 67 (06) :1757-1767
[7]   Assessing the Intraoperative Accuracy of Pedicle Screw Placement by Using a Bone-Mounted Miniature Robot System through Secondary Registration [J].
Kuo, Keng-Liang ;
Su, Yu-Feng ;
Wu, Chieh-Hsin ;
Tsai, Cheng-Yu ;
Chang, Chih-Hui ;
Lin, Chih-Lung ;
Tsai, Tai-Hsin .
PLOS ONE, 2016, 11 (04)
[8]  
Liao Y, 2017, Chinese Patent., Patent No. [CN107595389A, 107595389]
[9]   Comparison of the accuracy between robot-assisted and conventional freehand pedicle screw placement: a systematic review and meta-analysis [J].
Liu, Hao ;
Chen, Weikai ;
Wang, Zongyi ;
Lin, Jun ;
Meng, Bin ;
Yang, Huilin .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOLOGY AND SURGERY, 2016, 11 (12) :2273-2281
[10]  
Liu YJ, 2017, Non-invasive fixation device of tracer in spinal surgery navigation. Chinese Patent., Patent No. [CN206333963U, 206333963U]