Risk Prediction Models for Kidney Cancer: A Systematic Review

被引:39
作者
Harrison, Hannah [1 ]
Thompson, Rachel E. [2 ]
Lin, Zhiyuan [2 ]
Rossi, Sabrina H. [3 ]
Stewart, Grant D. [3 ]
Griffin, Simon J. [1 ]
Usher-Smith, Juliet A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Cambridge, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Primary Care Unit, Cambridge, England
[2] Univ Cambridge, Addenbrookes Hosp, Sch Clin Med, Cambridge, England
[3] Univ Cambridge, Addenbrookes Hosp, Dept Surg, Cambridge, England
来源
EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS | 2021年 / 7卷 / 06期
关键词
Kidney cancer; Early detection; Screening; Systematic review; RENAL-CELL CARCINOMA; APPLICABILITY; BIOMARKERS; SURVIVAL; PROBAST; BIAS; TOOL; AGE;
D O I
10.1016/j.euf.2020.06.024
中图分类号
R5 [内科学]; R69 [泌尿科学(泌尿生殖系疾病)];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
Context: Early detection of kidney cancer improves survival; however, low prevalence means that population-wide screening may be inefficient. Stratification of the population into risk categories could allow for the introduction of a screening programme tailored to individuals. Objective: This review will identify and compare published models that predict the risk of developing kidney cancer in the general population. Evidence acquisition: A search identified primary research reporting or validating models predicting the risk of kidney cancer in Medline and EMBASE. After screening identified studies for inclusion, we extracted data onto a standardised form. The risk models were classified using the Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis Or Diagnosis (TRIPOD) guidelines and evaluated using the PROBAST assessment tool. Evidence synthesis: The search identified 15 281 articles. Sixty-two satisfied the inclusion criteria; performance measures were provided for 11 models. Some models predicted the risk of prevalent undiagnosed disease and others future incident disease. Six of the models had been validated, two using external populations. The most commonly included risk factors were age, smoking status, and body mass index. Most of the models had acceptable-to-good discrimination (area under the receiver-operating curve >0.7) in development and validation. Many models also had high specificity; however, several had low sensitivity. The highest performance was seen for the models using only biomarkers to detect kidney cancer; however, these were developed and validated in small case-control studies. Conclusions: We identified a small number of risk models that could be used to stratify the population according to the risk of kidney cancer. Most exhibit reasonable discrimination, but a few have been validated externally in population-based studies. Patient summary: In this review, we looked at mathematical models predicting the likelihood of an individual developing kidney cancer. We found several suitable models, using a range of risk factors (such as age and smoking) to predict the risk for individuals. Most of the models identified require further testing in the general population to confirm their usefulness. (c) 2020 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
引用
收藏
页码:1380 / 1390
页数:11
相关论文
共 38 条
  • [21] Incidental renal neoplasms: is there a need for routine screening? A Danish single-center epidemiological study
    Rabjerg, Maj
    Mikkelsen, Minne Nedergaard
    Walter, Steen
    Marcussen, Niels
    [J]. APMIS, 2014, 122 (08) : 708 - 714
  • [22] Meta-analysis of the prevalence of renal cancer detected by abdominal ultrasonography
    Rossi, S. H.
    Hsu, R.
    Blick, C.
    Goh, V.
    Nathan, P.
    Nicol, D.
    Fleming, S.
    Sweeting, M.
    Wilson, E. C. F.
    Stewart, G. D.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 104 (06) : 648 - 659
  • [23] A Decision Analysis Evaluating Screening for Kidney Cancer Using Focused Renal Ultrasound
    Rossi, Sabrina H.
    Klatte, Tobias
    Usher-Smith, Juliet A.
    Fife, Kate
    Welsh, Sarah J.
    Dabestani, Saeed
    Bex, Axel
    Nicol, David
    Nathan, Paul
    Stewart, Grant D.
    Wilson, Edward C. F.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY FOCUS, 2021, 7 (02): : 407 - 419
  • [24] Setting Research Priorities in Partnership with Patients to Provide Patient-centred Urological Cancer Care
    Rossi, Sabrina H.
    Fielding, Alison
    Blick, Christopher
    Handforth, Catherine
    Brown, Janet E.
    Stewart, Grant D.
    [J]. EUROPEAN UROLOGY, 2019, 75 (06) : 891 - 893
  • [25] Epidemiology and screening for renal cancer
    Rossi, Sabrina H.
    Klatte, Tobias
    Usher-Smith, Juliet
    Stewart, Grant D.
    [J]. WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY, 2018, 36 (09) : 1341 - 1353
  • [26] KIM-1 as a Blood-Based Marker for Early Detection of Kidney Cancer: A Prospective Nested Case-Control Study
    Scelo, Ghislaine
    Muller, David C.
    Riboli, Elio
    Johansson, Mattias
    Cross, Amanda J.
    Vineis, Paolo
    Tsilidis, Konstantinos K.
    Brennan, Paul
    Boeing, Heiner
    Peeters, Petra H. M.
    Vermeulen, Roel C. H.
    Overvad, Kim
    Bueno-de-Mesquita, H. Bas
    Severi, Gianluca
    Perduca, Vittorio
    Kvaskoff, Marina
    Trichopoulou, Antonia
    La Vecchia, Carlo
    Karakatsani, Anna
    Palli, Domenico
    Sieri, Sabina
    Panico, Salvatore
    Weiderpass, Elisabete
    Sandanger, Torkjel M.
    Nost, Therese H.
    Agudo, Antonio
    Ramon Quiros, J.
    Rodriguez-Barranco, Miguel
    Chirlaque, Maria-Dolores
    Key, Timothy J.
    Khanna, Prateek
    Bonventre, Joseph V.
    Sabbisetti, Venkata S.
    Bhatt, Rupal S.
    [J]. CLINICAL CANCER RESEARCH, 2018, 24 (22) : 5594 - 5601
  • [27] Clinical features of kidney cancer in primary care: a case-control study using primary care records
    Shephard, E. A.
    Neal, Richard
    Rose, Peter
    Walter, Fiona
    Hamilton, William T.
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF GENERAL PRACTICE, 2013, 63 (609) : E250 - E255
  • [28] Screening for Breast Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
    Siu, Albert L.
    Bibbins-Domingo, Kirsten
    Grossman, David C.
    Baumann, Linda Ciofu
    Davidson, Karina W.
    Ebell, Mark
    Garcia, Francisco A. R.
    Gillman, Matthew
    Herzstein, Jessica
    Kemper, Alex R.
    Krist, Alex H.
    Kurth, Ann E.
    Owens, Douglas K.
    Phillips, William R.
    Phipps, Maureen G.
    Pignone, Michael P.
    LeFevre, Michael
    [J]. ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2016, 164 (04) : 279 - +
  • [29] Stewart B. W., 2003, World Cancer Report
  • [30] Stewart BW., 2003, World Cancer Report, P29