Can modified LI-RADS increase the sensitivity of LI-RADS v2018 for the diagnosis of 10-19 mm hepatocellular carcinoma on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI?

被引:13
作者
Xie, Sidong [1 ]
Zhang, Yao [1 ]
Chen, Jingbiao [1 ]
Jiang, Ting [1 ]
Liu, Weimin [1 ]
Rong, Dailin [1 ]
Sun, Lin [1 ]
Zhang, Linqi [1 ]
He, Bingjun [1 ]
Wang, Jin [1 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ SYSU, Affiliated Hosp 3, Dept Radiol, 600 Tianhe Rd, Guangzhou 510630, Guangdong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Liver neoplasms; Diagnosis; Sensitivity and specificity; Magnetic resonance imaging; Gadoxetic acid; NONINVASIVE DIAGNOSIS; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; HEPATOBILIARY PHASE; HYPOVASCULAR NODULES; CIRRHOTIC LIVER; FEATURES; HYPOINTENSITY; PERFORMANCE; RISK; FAT;
D O I
10.1007/s00261-021-03339-7
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose To evaluate whether the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2018 LR-5 criteria can be modified to increase sensitivity without reducing specificity for diagnosing 10-19 mm hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods A total of 133 high-risk consecutive patients with 174 small observations (10-19 mm) detected on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI were retrospectively studied. LI-RADS MRI major features (MFs) and ancillary features (AFs) were reviewed by two independent radiologists in consensus. Observations were categorized using LI-RADS v2018 MFs. Independently significant AFs were identified through logistic regression analysis. Upgraded LR-5 criteria were developed by combining independently significant AFs with MFs of LR-3 or LR-4 v2018. The sensitivity and specificity of the new diagnostic criteria were compared with those of LR-5 v2018 using McNemar's test. Results Three of the AFs favoring malignancy [mild-moderate T2 hyperintensity, transitional phase (TP) hypointensity and fat in mass] were independently significant features for diagnosing 10-19 mm HCC. The upgraded LR-5 criteria (mLI-RADS VII: LR-4 + mild-moderate T2 hyperintensity/TP hypointensity or LR-3 + fat in mass) yielded a significantly greater sensitivity than that of the LR-5 v2018 criteria (70.4% vs 55.1%; p < 0.001), whereas the specificity was not significantly different (94.7% vs 98.7%, p = 0.250). Conclusions Independently significant AFs may be used to upgrade an observation from LR-3/LR-4 to LR-5, which can improve the sensitivity without impairing the specificity for diagnosing 10-19 mm HCC on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. [GRAPHICS]
引用
收藏
页码:596 / 607
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] New strategy of LI-RADS v2018 to improve the sensitivity for small hepatocellular carcinoma ≤ 3.0 cm on extracellular-contrast enhanced MRI
    Zhou, Jinhui
    Zhang, Yao
    Zhang, Jing
    Chen, Jingbiao
    Jiang, Hang
    Zhang, Linqi
    Zhong, Xi
    Zhang, Tianhui
    Chen, Lichun
    Wang, Yufeng
    Xu, Yikai
    Wang, Jin
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2024, 181
  • [22] LI-RADS Version 2017 versus Version 2018: Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma on Gadoxetate Disodium enhanced MRI
    Lee, Sang Min
    Lee, Jeong Min
    Ahn, Su Joa
    Kang, Hyo-Jin
    Yang, Hyun Kyung
    Yoon, Jeong Hee
    RADIOLOGY, 2019, 292 (03) : 655 - 663
  • [23] Prognosis after Curative Resection of Single Hepatocellular Carcinoma with A Focus on LI-RADS Targetoid Appearance on Preoperative Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI
    Moon, Ji Yoon
    Min, Ji Hye
    Kim, Young Kon
    Cha, Donglk
    Hwang, Jeong Ah
    Ko, Seong Eun
    Choi, Seo-Youn
    Yun, Eun Joo
    Kim, Seon Woo
    Won, Ho-Jeong
    KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 22 (11) : 1786 - 1796
  • [24] Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma: LI-RADS v2017 categorisation for differential diagnosis and prognostication on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging
    Sun Kyung Jeon
    Ijin Joo
    Dong Ho Lee
    Sang Min Lee
    Hyo-Jin Kang
    Kyoung-Bun Lee
    Jeong Min Lee
    European Radiology, 2019, 29 : 373 - 382
  • [25] Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma: LI-RADS v2017 categorisation for differential diagnosis and prognostication on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging
    Jeon, Sun Kyung
    Joo, Ijin
    Lee, Dong Ho
    Lee, Sang Min
    Kang, Hyo-Jin
    Lee, Kyoung-Bun
    Lee, Jeong Min
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (01) : 373 - 382
  • [26] Diagnosis of Non-Hepatocellular Carcinoma Malignancies in Patients With Risks for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: CEUS LI-RADS Versus CT/MRI LI-RADS
    Hu, Yi-Xin
    Shen, Jing-Xian
    Han, Jing
    Mao, Si-Yue
    Mao, Ru-Shuang
    Li, Qing
    Li, Fei
    Guo, Zhi-Xing
    Zhou, Jian-Hua
    FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
  • [27] LI-RADS category 5 hepatocellular carcinoma: preoperative gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for early recurrence risk stratification after curative resection
    Wei, Hong
    Jiang, Hanyu
    Zheng, Tianying
    Zhang, Zhen
    Yang, Caiwei
    Ye, Zheng
    Duan, Ting
    Song, Bin
    EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2021, 31 (04) : 2289 - 2302
  • [28] Performance of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI for the diagnosis of LI-RADS 4 category hepatocellular carcinoma nodules with different diameters
    Tang, Qi
    Ma, Cong
    ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2018, 16 (02) : 2725 - 2731
  • [29] Liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) v2018: comparison between computed tomography and gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging
    Nakao, Sei
    Tanabe, Masahiro
    Okada, Munemasa
    Furukawa, Matakazu
    Iida, Etsushi
    Miyoshi, Keisuke
    Matsunaga, Naofumi
    Ito, Katsuyoshi
    JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 37 (09) : 651 - 659
  • [30] Assessment of primary liver carcinomas other than hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) with LI-RADS v2018: comparison of the LI-RADS target population to patients without LI-RADS-defined HCC risk factors
    Tyler J. Fraum
    Roberto Cannella
    Daniel R. Ludwig
    Richard Tsai
    Muhammad Naeem
    Maverick LeBlanc
    Amber Salter
    Allan Tsung
    Anup S. Shetty
    Amir A. Borhani
    Alessandro Furlan
    Kathryn J. Fowler
    European Radiology, 2020, 30 : 996 - 1007