Can modified LI-RADS increase the sensitivity of LI-RADS v2018 for the diagnosis of 10-19 mm hepatocellular carcinoma on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI?

被引:14
作者
Xie, Sidong [1 ]
Zhang, Yao [1 ]
Chen, Jingbiao [1 ]
Jiang, Ting [1 ]
Liu, Weimin [1 ]
Rong, Dailin [1 ]
Sun, Lin [1 ]
Zhang, Linqi [1 ]
He, Bingjun [1 ]
Wang, Jin [1 ]
机构
[1] Sun Yat Sen Univ SYSU, Affiliated Hosp 3, Dept Radiol, 600 Tianhe Rd, Guangzhou 510630, Guangdong, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Liver neoplasms; Diagnosis; Sensitivity and specificity; Magnetic resonance imaging; Gadoxetic acid; NONINVASIVE DIAGNOSIS; MAGNETIC-RESONANCE; HEPATOBILIARY PHASE; HYPOVASCULAR NODULES; CIRRHOTIC LIVER; FEATURES; HYPOINTENSITY; PERFORMANCE; RISK; FAT;
D O I
10.1007/s00261-021-03339-7
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Purpose To evaluate whether the Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) v2018 LR-5 criteria can be modified to increase sensitivity without reducing specificity for diagnosing 10-19 mm hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) on gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Methods A total of 133 high-risk consecutive patients with 174 small observations (10-19 mm) detected on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI were retrospectively studied. LI-RADS MRI major features (MFs) and ancillary features (AFs) were reviewed by two independent radiologists in consensus. Observations were categorized using LI-RADS v2018 MFs. Independently significant AFs were identified through logistic regression analysis. Upgraded LR-5 criteria were developed by combining independently significant AFs with MFs of LR-3 or LR-4 v2018. The sensitivity and specificity of the new diagnostic criteria were compared with those of LR-5 v2018 using McNemar's test. Results Three of the AFs favoring malignancy [mild-moderate T2 hyperintensity, transitional phase (TP) hypointensity and fat in mass] were independently significant features for diagnosing 10-19 mm HCC. The upgraded LR-5 criteria (mLI-RADS VII: LR-4 + mild-moderate T2 hyperintensity/TP hypointensity or LR-3 + fat in mass) yielded a significantly greater sensitivity than that of the LR-5 v2018 criteria (70.4% vs 55.1%; p < 0.001), whereas the specificity was not significantly different (94.7% vs 98.7%, p = 0.250). Conclusions Independently significant AFs may be used to upgrade an observation from LR-3/LR-4 to LR-5, which can improve the sensitivity without impairing the specificity for diagnosing 10-19 mm HCC on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. [GRAPHICS]
引用
收藏
页码:596 / 607
页数:12
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   New strategy of LI-RADS v2018 to improve the sensitivity for small hepatocellular carcinoma ≤ 3.0 cm on extracellular-contrast enhanced MRI [J].
Zhou, Jinhui ;
Zhang, Yao ;
Zhang, Jing ;
Chen, Jingbiao ;
Jiang, Hang ;
Zhang, Linqi ;
Zhong, Xi ;
Zhang, Tianhui ;
Chen, Lichun ;
Wang, Yufeng ;
Xu, Yikai ;
Wang, Jin .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2024, 181
[22]   LI-RADS Version 2017 versus Version 2018: Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma on Gadoxetate Disodium enhanced MRI [J].
Lee, Sang Min ;
Lee, Jeong Min ;
Ahn, Su Joa ;
Kang, Hyo-Jin ;
Yang, Hyun Kyung ;
Yoon, Jeong Hee .
RADIOLOGY, 2019, 292 (03) :655-663
[23]   Prognosis after Curative Resection of Single Hepatocellular Carcinoma with A Focus on LI-RADS Targetoid Appearance on Preoperative Gadoxetic Acid-Enhanced MRI [J].
Moon, Ji Yoon ;
Min, Ji Hye ;
Kim, Young Kon ;
Cha, Donglk ;
Hwang, Jeong Ah ;
Ko, Seong Eun ;
Choi, Seo-Youn ;
Yun, Eun Joo ;
Kim, Seon Woo ;
Won, Ho-Jeong .
KOREAN JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2021, 22 (11) :1786-1796
[24]   Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma: LI-RADS v2017 categorisation for differential diagnosis and prognostication on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging [J].
Sun Kyung Jeon ;
Ijin Joo ;
Dong Ho Lee ;
Sang Min Lee ;
Hyo-Jin Kang ;
Kyoung-Bun Lee ;
Jeong Min Lee .
European Radiology, 2019, 29 :373-382
[25]   Combined hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma: LI-RADS v2017 categorisation for differential diagnosis and prognostication on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MR imaging [J].
Jeon, Sun Kyung ;
Joo, Ijin ;
Lee, Dong Ho ;
Lee, Sang Min ;
Kang, Hyo-Jin ;
Lee, Kyoung-Bun ;
Lee, Jeong Min .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2019, 29 (01) :373-382
[26]   Diagnosis of Non-Hepatocellular Carcinoma Malignancies in Patients With Risks for Hepatocellular Carcinoma: CEUS LI-RADS Versus CT/MRI LI-RADS [J].
Hu, Yi-Xin ;
Shen, Jing-Xian ;
Han, Jing ;
Mao, Si-Yue ;
Mao, Ru-Shuang ;
Li, Qing ;
Li, Fei ;
Guo, Zhi-Xing ;
Zhou, Jian-Hua .
FRONTIERS IN ONCOLOGY, 2021, 11
[27]   LI-RADS category 5 hepatocellular carcinoma: preoperative gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI for early recurrence risk stratification after curative resection [J].
Wei, Hong ;
Jiang, Hanyu ;
Zheng, Tianying ;
Zhang, Zhen ;
Yang, Caiwei ;
Ye, Zheng ;
Duan, Ting ;
Song, Bin .
EUROPEAN RADIOLOGY, 2021, 31 (04) :2289-2302
[28]   Performance of Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI for the diagnosis of LI-RADS 4 category hepatocellular carcinoma nodules with different diameters [J].
Tang, Qi ;
Ma, Cong .
ONCOLOGY LETTERS, 2018, 16 (02) :2725-2731
[29]   Liver imaging reporting and data system (LI-RADS) v2018: comparison between computed tomography and gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Nakao, Sei ;
Tanabe, Masahiro ;
Okada, Munemasa ;
Furukawa, Matakazu ;
Iida, Etsushi ;
Miyoshi, Keisuke ;
Matsunaga, Naofumi ;
Ito, Katsuyoshi .
JAPANESE JOURNAL OF RADIOLOGY, 2019, 37 (09) :651-659
[30]   LI-RADS M (LR-M) criteria and reporting algorithm of v2018: diagnostic values in the assessment of primary liver cancers on gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI [J].
Kim, Min Young ;
Joo, Ijin ;
Kang, Hyo Jin ;
Seok, Jae ;
Jeon, Sun Kyung ;
Lee, Jeong Min .
ABDOMINAL RADIOLOGY, 2020, 45 (08) :2440-2448