Prediction of common bile duct stones in the earliest stages of acute biliary pancreatitis

被引:44
|
作者
van Santvoort, H. C. [2 ]
Bakker, O. J. [2 ]
Besselink, M. G. [2 ]
Bollen, T. L. [3 ]
Fischer, K. [4 ]
Nieuwenhuijs, V. B. [5 ]
Gooszen, H. G. [6 ]
Erpecum, K. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Gastroenterol, NL-3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
[2] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Dept Surg, NL-3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
[3] St Antonius Hosp, Dept Radiol, Nieuwegein, Netherlands
[4] Univ Med Ctr Utrecht, Julius Ctr Hlth Sci & Primary Care, NL-3508 GA Utrecht, Netherlands
[5] Univ Groningen, Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Dept Surg, Groningen, Netherlands
[6] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, NL-6525 ED Nijmegen, Netherlands
关键词
ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY; GALLSTONE PANCREATITIS; EUS; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; ULTRASONOGRAPHY; GUIDELINES; MANAGEMENT; SEVERITY;
D O I
10.1055/s-0030-1255866
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background and study aims: Accurate prediction of common bile duct (CBD) stones in acute biliary pancreatitis is warranted to select patients for early therapeutic endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). We evaluated commonly used biochemical and radiological predictors of CBD stones in a large prospective cohort of patients with acute biliary pancreatitis who were undergoing early ERCP. Patients and methods: 167 patients with acute biliary pancreatitis who were undergoing early ERCP (< 72 hours after symptom onset) in 15 Dutch hospitals in 2004-2007 were prospectively included. Abdominal ultrasonography and/or computed tomography (CT) was performed on admission and complete liver biochemistry determined daily. We used univariate logistic regression to assess associations between CBD stones found during ERCP (gold standard) and the following parameters: (1) clinical: age, sex, predicted severity; (2) radiological: dilated CBD, impacted stone in CBD; and (3) biochemical: bilirubin, gamma-glutamyl-transferase (GGT), alkaline phosphatase, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST). Results: Out of 167 patients, 94 (56%) had predicted severe acute biliary pancreatitis, 51 (31%) exhibited a dilated CBD and 15 (9%) had CBD stones on ultrasonography and/or CT. ERCP was performed at a median of 0 days (interquartile range 0-1) after admission. CBD stones were found during ERCP in 89/167 patients (53%). In univariate analysis, the only parameters significantly associated with CBD stones were GGT (per 10 units increase: odds ratio 1.02, 95% CI 1.01-1.03, P = 0.001) and alkaline phosphatase (per 10 units increase: odds ratio 1.03, 95% CI 1.00-1.05, P = 0.028). These and all other tested parameters, however, showed poor positive predictive value (ranging from 0.53 to 0.69) and poor negative predictive value (ranging from 0.46 to 0.67). Conclusions: The results of this study suggest that commonly used biochemical and radiological predictors of the presence of CBD stones during ERCP in the earliest stages of acute biliary pancreatitis are unreliable.
引用
收藏
页码:8 / 13
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Acute biliary pancreatitis: detection of common bile duct stones with endoscopic ultrasound
    Stabuc, Borut
    Drobne, David
    Ferkolj, Ivan
    Gruden, Andrej
    Jereb, Janez
    Kolar, Gorazd
    Mlinaric, Vladimir
    Mervic, Manfred
    Repse, Aljaz
    Stepec, Srecko
    Markovic, Sasa
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2008, 20 (12) : 1171 - 1175
  • [2] Diagnostic value of magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography to detect bile duct stones in acute biliary pancreatitis
    Lee, Su-Lim
    Kim, Hyung-Keun
    Choi, Hyun-Ho
    Jeon, Bu-Seok
    Kim, Tae-Hyung
    Choi, Jong-Min
    Ku, Young-Mi
    Kim, Sang-Woo
    Kim, Sung-Soo
    Chae, Hiun-Suk
    PANCREATOLOGY, 2018, 18 (01) : 22 - 28
  • [3] LAPAROSCOPIC TREATMENT OF GALLSTONES AND BILE-DUCT STONES IN MILD ACUTE BILIARY PANCREATITIS
    GUIBERT, L
    DEWATTEVILLE, JC
    GAYRAL, F
    GASTROENTEROLOGIE CLINIQUE ET BIOLOGIQUE, 1995, 19 (10): : 747 - 750
  • [4] Does presence of common bile duct stones in patients with acute biliary pancreatitis affect the severity of illness or laboratory findings?
    Alper, Emrah
    Baydar, Behhul
    Vatansever, Sezgin
    Buyrac, Zafer
    Aslan, Fatih
    Akpinar, Zehra
    Aksoz, M. Kadir
    Akca, Serdar
    Unsal, Belkis
    TURKISH JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2011, 22 (05): : 517 - 522
  • [5] Can ultrasound common bile duct diameter predict common bile duct stones in the setting of acute cholecystitis?
    Boys, Joshua A.
    Doorly, Michael G.
    Zehetner, Joerg
    Dhanireddy, Kiran K.
    Senagore, Anthony J.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2014, 207 (03): : 432 - 435
  • [6] Advantages of laparoscopic common bile duct exploration in common bile duct stones
    Li, Ke-Yue
    Shi, Cheng-Xian
    Tang, Ke-li
    Huang, Jian-zhao
    Zhang, De-lin
    WIENER KLINISCHE WOCHENSCHRIFT, 2018, 130 (3-4) : 100 - 104
  • [7] Prevalence of Persistent Common Bile Duct Stones in Acute Biliary Pancreatitis Remains Stable Within the First Week of Symptoms
    Fratantoni, Maria Eugenia
    Giuffrida, Pablo
    Di Menno, Juliana
    Ardiles, Victoria
    de Santibanes, Martin
    Claria, Rodrigo Sanchez
    Palavecino, Martin
    de Santibanes, Eduardo
    Pekolj, Juan
    Mazza, Oscar
    JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERY, 2021, 25 (12) : 3178 - 3187
  • [8] Body Mass Index, Cholecystitis, Cholelithiasis, Pancreatitis and Imaging of Common Bile Duct Stones
    Coban, Gokcen
    Yildirim, Erkan
    Gokturk, Savas
    Caliskan, Zuhal
    Turk, Emin
    Akcil, Mehtap
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF THE MEDICAL SCIENCES, 2014, 347 (05): : 364 - 369
  • [9] The effect of biliary stenting on difficult common bile duct stones
    Aslan, Fatih
    Arabul, Mahmut
    Celik, Mustafa
    Alper, Emrah
    Unsal, Belkis
    PRZEGLAD GASTROENTEROLOGICZNY, 2014, 9 (02): : 109 - 115
  • [10] Optimal treatment for concomitant gallbladder stones with common bile duct stones and predictors for recurrence of common bile duct stones
    Lee, Seung Jae
    Choi, In Seok
    Moon, Ju Ik
    Choi, Yong Woo
    SURGICAL ENDOSCOPY AND OTHER INTERVENTIONAL TECHNIQUES, 2022, 36 (07): : 4748 - 4756