Risk factors of inadequate pain relief during epidural analgesia for labour and delivery

被引:48
作者
Le Coq, G
Ducot, B
Benhamou, D
机构
[1] Hop Antoine Beclere, Dept Anesthesia, F-92141 Clamart, France
[2] Univ Paris Sud, INSERM, Unite Sante Publ Epidemiol & Reprod Humaine, U292,Hop Bicetre, F-94270 Le Kremlin Bicetre, France
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE | 1998年 / 45卷 / 08期
关键词
D O I
10.1007/BF03012140
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Purpose: To determine the causes of failure of epidural analgesia during labour and delivery. Methods: During six months, pregnant patients receiving:epidural analgesia and delivering vaginally were studied prospectively. Bupivacaine 0.125% was used for the initial bolus dose and subsequent continuous infusion. Top-ups of the same solution were used for inadequate pain relief assessed using a visual analogue pain score (VAPS) and/or by clinical examination. Inadequate pain relief was defined as the need for greater than or equal to 2 top-ups in addition to epidural infusion and failure during delivery as VAPS greater than or equal to 30 mm during the expulsion phase, Results: 1009 patients delivered during this period, 596 had epidural analgesia for vaginal delivery of a live infant and data were complete in 456. Inadequate pain relief during labour and during delivery were found in 5.3% and 19.7% of patients. Risk factors of inadequate pain relief included inadequate analgesic efficacy of the first dose (Odds ratio: 3.5, P = 0.001) and posterior presentation (Odds ratio: 5.6, P = 0.001). Radicular pain during epidural placement was associated with failure during labour (Odds ratio: 3.9, P = 0.05). Duration of epidural analgesia > six hours (Odds ratio: 9.1, P = 0.001) was a risk factor for insufficient pain relief during labour whereas duration of epidural analgesia < one hour was associated with pain during delivery (Odds ratio: 18.3, P = 0.001). Conclusion: Several obstetrical and epidural-related factors increase the risk of inadequate epidural;analgesia. For some, simple changes of practice pattern may lead to improved pain relief.
引用
收藏
页码:719 / 723
页数:5
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   COMBINED SPINAL-EPIDURAL ANALGESIA IN ADVANCED LABOR [J].
ABOULEISH, A ;
ABOULEISH, E ;
CAMANN, W .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 1994, 41 (07) :575-578
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1990, MANAGEMENT PAIN
[3]   EPIDURAL FENTANYL BUPIVACAINE MIXTURES FOR OBSTETRIC ANALGESIA [J].
COHEN, SE ;
TAN, S ;
ALBRIGHT, GA ;
HALPERN, J .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1987, 67 (03) :403-407
[4]  
Collier C B, 1996, Int J Obstet Anesth, V5, P19, DOI 10.1016/S0959-289X(96)80070-7
[5]   RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF COMBINED SPINAL-EPIDURAL AND STANDARD EPIDURAL ANALGESIA IN LABOR [J].
COLLIS, RE ;
DAVIES, DWL ;
AVELING, W .
LANCET, 1995, 345 (8962) :1413-1416
[6]  
Cruchley PM, 1994, CAN J ANAESTH, V41, pA30
[7]   A MULTIFACTORIAL ANALYSIS TO EXPLAIN INADEQUATE SURGICAL ANALGESIA AFTER EXTRADURAL BLOCK [J].
CURATOLO, M ;
ORLANDO, A ;
ZBINDEN, AM ;
SCARAMOZZINO, P ;
VENUTI, FS .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1995, 75 (03) :274-281
[8]  
DALENS B, 1987, ANESTH ANALG, V66, P679
[9]   Prospective examination of epidural catheter insertion [J].
DAngelo, R ;
Berkebile, BL ;
Gerancher, JC .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1996, 84 (01) :88-93
[10]   A comparison of multiport and uniport epidural catheters in laboring patients [J].
DAngelo, R ;
Foss, ML ;
Livesay, CH .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1997, 84 (06) :1276-1279