Drivers and barriers in adopting Mobility as a Service (MaaS) - A latent class cluster analysis of attitudes

被引:181
作者
Alonso-Gonzalez, Maria J. [1 ]
Hoogendoorn-Lanser, Sascha [2 ]
van Oort, Niels [1 ]
Cats, Oded [1 ]
Hoogendoorn, Serge [1 ]
机构
[1] Delft Univ Technol, Dept Transport & Planning, Delft, Netherlands
[2] KiM Netherlands Inst Transport Policy Anal, The Hague, Netherlands
关键词
Mobility as a Service (MaaS); Pooled on-demand services; Attitudes; Latent class cluster analysis; Adoption barriers; CHOICE; PREFERENCES; TRANSPORT; TRANSIT; DEMAND; RIDE; WILLINGNESS; SYSTEMS;
D O I
10.1016/j.tra.2019.11.022
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Mobility as a Service (MaaS) is expected to significantly change mobility patterns, yet it is still not clear who will embrace this new mobility paradigm and how MaaS will impact passengers' transportation. In the paper, we identify factors relevant for MaaS adoption based on a survey comprised of over thousand respondents in the Netherlands. We find five clusters in relation to individuals' inclinations to adopt MaaS in the context of urban mobility. We characterize each of the clusters, allowing for the examining of different customer segments regarding MaaS. The cluster with the highest inclination for future MaaS adoption is also the largest cluster (representing one third of respondents). Individuals in this cluster have multimodal weekly mobility patterns. On the contrary, current unimodal car users are the least likely to adopt MaaS. We identify high (mobility) ownership need and low technology adoption (present in three of the five clusters) as the main barriers that can hinder MaaS adoption. Policies that directly address these two barriers can stimulate MaaS adoption.
引用
收藏
页码:378 / 401
页数:24
相关论文
共 85 条
[61]   Beyond the number of classes: separating substantive from non-substantive dependence in latent class analysis [J].
Oberski, D. L. .
ADVANCES IN DATA ANALYSIS AND CLASSIFICATION, 2016, 10 (02) :171-182
[62]   A Monte Carlo evaluation of three methods to detect local dependence in binary data latent class models [J].
Oberski, Daniel L. ;
van Kollenburg, Geert H. ;
Vermunt, Jeroen K. .
ADVANCES IN DATA ANALYSIS AND CLASSIFICATION, 2013, 7 (03) :267-279
[63]   Preferences for car sharing services: Effects of instrumental attributes and psychological ownership [J].
Paundra, Joshua ;
Rook, Laurens ;
van Dalen, Jan ;
Ketter, Wolfgang .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2017, 53 :121-130
[64]   Creating synergy in and around stations - Three strategies for adding value [J].
Peek, GJ ;
van Hagen, M .
TRANSIT: INTERMODAL FACILITIES, RAIL TRANSIT, COMMUTER RAIL, LIGHT RAIL TRANSIT, MAINTENANCE, AND FERRY TRANSPORTATION: PUBLIC TRANSIT, 2002, (1793) :1-6
[65]   Travellers' profiles definition using statistical multivariate analysis of attitudinal variables [J].
Pronello, Cristina ;
Camusso, Cristian .
JOURNAL OF TRANSPORT GEOGRAPHY, 2011, 19 (06) :1294-1308
[66]   Consumer innovativeness - Concepts and measurements [J].
Roehrich, G .
JOURNAL OF BUSINESS RESEARCH, 2004, 57 (06) :671-677
[67]  
Rubin J., 2011, Choosing Transit: The Influence of Past Travel Behavior, Attitudes and Habits on Present Choices UC Berkeley
[68]   Investigating the contribution of Demand Responsive Transport to a sustainable local public transport system [J].
Ryley, Tim J. ;
Stanley, Peter A. ;
Enoch, Marcus P. ;
Zanni, Alberto M. ;
Quddus, Mohammed A. .
RESEARCH IN TRANSPORTATION ECONOMICS, 2014, 48 :364-372
[69]   To Share or Not To Share Investigating the Social Aspects of Dynamic Ridesharing [J].
Sarriera, Javier Morales ;
Alvarez, German Escovar ;
Blynn, Kelly ;
Alesbury, Andrew ;
Scully, Timothy ;
Zhao, Jinhua .
TRANSPORTATION RESEARCH RECORD, 2017, (2605) :109-117
[70]  
Shaheen S., 2018, Future of Mobility White Paper, DOI DOI 10.7922/G2WH2N5D