Shelterbelt Structure and Crop Protection from Increased Typhoon Activity in Northeast China

被引:12
作者
Cai, Xuelu [1 ]
Henderson, Mark [2 ]
Wang, Ligang [3 ,4 ]
Su, Yuanhang [1 ]
Liu, Binhui [1 ]
机构
[1] Northeast Forestry Univ, Coll Forestry, Harbin 150040, Peoples R China
[2] Mills Coll, Oakland, CA 94613 USA
[3] Heilongjiang Acad Forestry, Qiqihar Branch, Qiqihar 161005, Peoples R China
[4] Natl Permanent Sci Res Base Shelter Forest Nenjia, Qiqihar 161005, Peoples R China
来源
AGRICULTURE-BASEL | 2021年 / 11卷 / 10期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
crop lodging; typhoon; shelterbelts; structure; distance between shelterbelt rows; digital image processing methods; BUCKWHEAT;
D O I
10.3390/agriculture11100995
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Global warming has led to increases in the frequency and intensity of typhoons. In recent years, super typhoons have had a greater impact on agriculture in the black soil farmland of Northeast China, posing serious threats to crop growth. Planting trees as windbreaks and to reduce erosion is common in this region, but their protective effects against crop damage from typhoons is still unknown. This paper studied the protective effect of different shelterbelt structures on crops that encountered a super typhoon. The results show that the distance between shelterbelt rows and shelterbelt porosity have significant influences on the starting lodging distance of crops behind the shelterbelt. Increasing the shelterbelt distance between shelterbelt rows or reducing shelterbelt porosity can enhance their protective effects on crops. Among the main crops, rice has the strongest lodging resistance, followed by soybeans, with maize being the least resistant. The protective effect of mixed tree and shrub shelterbelts is better than that of single tree species shelterbelts. Dead or missing trees reduce the shelterbelt protective effect. These results provide strategies for reducing the impact of more intense and frequent super typhoons.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [11] Jinn Z., 1997, CHIN J APPL ECOL, V8, P127
  • [12] Lei Z., 2015, CHIN AGR SCI B, V31, P34
  • [13] Li W.H., 2012, PROT SHELTER SCI TEC, V3, P6
  • [14] Optimizing the quantity and spatial patterns of farmland shelter forests increases cotton productivity in arid lands
    Li, Xiaoyu
    Liu, Lijuan
    Xie, Jiangbo
    Wang, Zhongyuan
    Yang, Shuya
    Zhang, Zhenyu
    Qi, Shanzhong
    Li, Yan
    [J]. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 2020, 292
  • [15] Li YongPing Li YongPing, 2009, Journal of Northwest A & F University - Natural Science Edition, V37, P92
  • [16] Menzies NicholasK., 1994, Forest and Land Management in Imperial China
  • [17] On shelterbelt design for combating sand invasion
    Mohammed, AE
    Stigter, CJ
    Adam, HS
    [J]. AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT, 1996, 57 (2-3) : 81 - 90
  • [18] Canopy height measurement by photogrammetric analysis of aerial images: Application to buckwheat (Fagopyrum esculentum Moench) lodging evaluation
    Murakami, Toshifumi
    Yui, Mamiko
    Amaha, Koichi
    [J]. COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 2012, 89 : 70 - 75
  • [19] Pablo L.P., 2002, AGROFOREST SYST, V56, P129
  • [20] SHELTER BEHIND TWO-DIMENSIONAL SOLID AND POROUS FENCES
    PERERA, MDAES
    [J]. JOURNAL OF WIND ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL AERODYNAMICS, 1981, 8 (1-2) : 93 - 104