erbB-2 and response to doxorubicin in patients with axillary lymph node-positive, hormone receptor-negative breast cancer

被引:513
作者
Paik, SM
Bryant, J
Park, CH
Fisher, B
Tan-Chiu, E
Hyams, D
Fisher, ER
Lippman, ME
Wickerham, DL
Wolmark, N
机构
[1] Allegheny Univ Hlth Sci, NSABP, Pathol Sect, Pittsburgh, PA 15212 USA
[2] Allegheny Univ Hlth Sci, Dept Human Oncol, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[3] Georgetown Univ, Med Ctr, Vincent T Lombardi Canc Res Ctr, Washington, DC 20007 USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Stat, Pittsburgh, PA 15260 USA
[5] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Biostat, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
来源
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE | 1998年 / 90卷 / 18期
关键词
D O I
10.1093/jnci/90.18.1361
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background: Overexpression of the erbB-2 protein by breast cancer cells has been suggested to be a predictor of response to doxorubicin. A retrospective study was designed to test this hypothesis. Methods: In National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project protocol B-ll, patients with axillary lymph node-positive, hormone receptor-negative breast cancer were randomly assigned to receive either L-phenylalanine mustard plus 5-fluorouracil (PF) or a combination of L-phenylalanine mustard, 5-fluorouracil, and doxorubicin (PAF), Tumor cell expression of erbB-2 was determined by immunohistochemistry for 638 of 682 eligible patients. Statistical analyses were performed to test for interaction between treatment and erbB-2 status (positive versus negative) with respect to disease-free survival (DFS), survival, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and distant disease-free survival (DDFS), Reported P values are two-sided. Results: Overexpression of erbB-2 (i.e., positive immunohistochemical staining) was observed in 239 (37.5%) of the 638 tumors studied. Overexpression was associated with tumor size (P = .02), lack of estrogen receptors (P = .008), and the number of positive lymph nodes (P = .0001), After a mean time on study of 13.5 years, the clinical benefit from doxorubicin (PAF versus PF) was statistically significant for patients with erbB-2-positive tumors-DFS: relative risk of failure (RR) = 0.60 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.44-0.83), P = .001; survival: RR = 0.66 (95% CI = 0.47-0.92), P = .01; RFS: RR = 0.58 (95% CI = 0.42-0.82), P = .002; DDFS: RR = 0.61 (95% CI = 0.44-0.85), P = .003, However, it was not significant for patients with erbB-2-negative tumors-DFS: RR = 0.96 (95% CI = 0.75-1.23), P = .74; survival: RR = 0.90 (95% CI = 0.69-1.19), P = .47; RFS: RR = 0.88 (95% CI = 0.67-1.16), P = .37; DDFS: RR = 1.03 (95% CI = 0.79-1.35), P = .84, Interaction between doxorubicin treatment and erbB-2 overexpression was statistically significant for DFS (P = .02) and DDFS (P = .02) but not for survival (P = .15) or RFS (P = .06), Conclusions: These data support the hypothesis of a preferential benefit from doxorubicin in patients with erbB-2-positive breast cancer.
引用
收藏
页码:1361 / 1370
页数:10
相关论文
共 24 条
[11]   Tumor marker utility grading system: A framework to evaluate clinical utility of tumor markers [J].
Hayes, DF ;
Bast, RC ;
Desch, CE ;
Fritsche, H ;
Kemeny, NE ;
Jessup, JM ;
Locker, GY ;
MacDonald, JS ;
Mennel, RG ;
Norton, L ;
Ravdin, P ;
Taube, S ;
Winn, RJ .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 1996, 88 (20) :1456-1466
[12]  
Jarvinen TAH, 1996, AM J PATHOL, V148, P2073
[13]   COAMPLIFICATION OF ERBB2, TOPOISOMERASE-II-ALPHA AND RETINOIC ACID RECEPTOR-ALPHA GENES IN BREAST-CANCER AND ALLELIC LOSS AT TOPOISOMERASE-I ON CHROMOSOME-20 [J].
KEITH, WN ;
DOUGLAS, F ;
WISHART, GC ;
MCCALLUM, HM ;
GEORGE, WD ;
KAYE, SB ;
BROWN, R .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1993, 29A (10) :1469-1475
[14]   ELEVATED SERUM C-ERBB-2 ANTIGEN LEVELS AND DECREASED RESPONSE TO HORMONE-THERAPY OF BREAST-CANCER [J].
LEITZEL, K ;
TERAMOTO, Y ;
KONRAD, K ;
CHINCHILLI, VM ;
VOLAS, G ;
GROSSBERG, H ;
HARVEY, H ;
DEMERS, L ;
LIPTON, A .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1995, 13 (05) :1129-1135
[15]  
MUSS HB, 1994, NEW ENGL J MED, V331, P211
[16]   C-ERBB-2 EXPRESSION AND RESPONSE TO ADJUVANT THERAPY IN WOMEN WITH NODE-POSITIVE EARLY BREAST-CANCER [J].
MUSS, HB ;
THOR, AD ;
BERRY, DA ;
KUTE, T ;
LIU, ET ;
KOERNER, F ;
CIRRINCIONE, CT ;
BUDMAN, DR ;
WOOD, WC ;
BARCOS, M ;
HENDERSON, IC .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1994, 330 (18) :1260-1266
[17]  
PAIK S, 1991, METHOD ENZYMOL, V198, P290
[18]   STUDIES OF THE HER-2/NEU PROTO-ONCOGENE IN HUMAN-BREAST AND OVARIAN-CANCER [J].
SLAMON, DJ ;
GODOLPHIN, W ;
JONES, LA ;
HOLT, JA ;
WONG, SG ;
KEITH, DE ;
LEVIN, WJ ;
STUART, SG ;
UDOVE, J ;
ULLRICH, A ;
PRESS, MF .
SCIENCE, 1989, 244 (4905) :707-712
[19]  
SMITH K, 1993, ONCOGENE, V8, P933
[20]  
TRIPATHY D, 1995, DRUG HORMONAL RESIST, P3