Effects of a mixture of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and Bacillus subtilis on the performance of growing-finishing pigs

被引:12
作者
van der Peet-Schwering, C. M. C. [1 ]
Verheijen, R. [1 ]
Jorgensen, L. [2 ]
Raff, L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Wageningen Univ & Res, Wageningen Livestock Res, PB 338, NL-6700 AH Wageningen, Netherlands
[2] Chr Hansen AS, Boge Alle 10-12, DK-2970 Horsholm, Denmark
关键词
Bacillus amyloliquefaciens; Bacillus subtilis; Growing-finishing pigs; Performance; NOXIOUS GAS CONTENT; GROWTH-PERFORMANCE; NUTRIENTS DIGESTIBILITY; BLOOD CHARACTERISTICS; HEALTH;
D O I
10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2020.114409
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
The study was conducted to determine the effects of a Bacillus-based probiotic (mixture of spores of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens DSM 25840 and Bacillus subtilis DSM 32324 supplementation on growth performance and health of growing-finishing (GF) pigs. A total of 576 GF pigs with initial body weight (BW) of 23.2 +/- 2.95 kg were allotted to one of two treatments (control diet and probiotic diet). Pigs were blocked by litter origin, BW and sex and allotted to 24 mixed-sex pens (6 entire males and 6 females per pen) per treatment. The GF pigs were fed pelleted diets containing 0 (control diet) or 400 mg/kg (6 x 10(8) CFU per kg feed; confirmed by analysis) of the Bacillus-based probiotic. The diets were supplied ad libitum as dry feed. Pigs were followed fill day 102 after the start of the study. During the grower phase (1-35 days), probiotic supplementation tended to improve the feed conversion ratio (FCR) (P = 0.09). During the finisher phase (35-102 days), probiotic supplementation significantly improved FCR (P = 0.03) and tended to increase the average daily gain (ADG) (P = 0.09). During the overall period (1-102 days), probiotic supplementation significantly improved FCR (P = 0.01). Probiotic supplementation did not affect the number of culled and veterinary treated pigs. The number of treatments due to ileitis (an infection with Lawsonia intracellularis), however, tended to be lower in the probiotic group (7 vs 16; P = 0.07). Most pigs showed normal faecal consistency in the grower phase and the mean pen faecal score during the grower phase was similar in the control group and the probiotic group. In conclusion, feeding GF pigs diets supplemented with 400 mg/ kg of a Bacillus-based probiotic containing a mixture of viable spores (confirmed by analysis before used in this trial) of two specific strains of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and Bacillus subtilis improved the FCR of the GF pigs during the overall fattening period. Moreover, it tended to decrease the number of veterinary treatments due to ileitis.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
Ahasan ASML., 2015, J. Dairy, V2, P116, DOI [DOI 10.15406/JDVAR.2015.02.00041, 10.15406/JDVAR.2015.02.00041]
[2]   Field evaluation of the effect of a probiotic-containing Bacillus licheniformis and Bacillus subtilis spores on the health status, performance, and carcass quality of grower and finisher pigs [J].
Alexopoulos, C ;
Georgoulakis, IE ;
Tzivara, A ;
Kyriakis, CS ;
Govaris, A ;
Kyriakis, SC .
JOURNAL OF VETERINARY MEDICINE SERIES A-PHYSIOLOGY PATHOLOGY CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2004, 51 (06) :306-312
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2009, 15784 NENEN, P1
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2017, 15510 NENEN, P1
[5]  
BAJAGAI Y.S., 2016, Probiotics in animal nutrition: production, impact and regulation
[6]  
Barba-Vidal E, 2018, ANIMAL, V12, P2489, DOI [10.1017/S1751731118000873, 10.1017/s1751731118000873]
[7]   Effects of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens and Bacillus subtilis on ileal digestibility of AA and total tract digestibility of CP and gross energy in diets fed to growing pigs [J].
Blavi, Laia ;
Jorgensen, Jens N. ;
Stein, Hans H. .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2019, 97 (02) :727-734
[8]  
Bouwhuis M., 2017, P IPC2017 BUD HUNG 2, P20
[9]   Effects of a multi-strain Bacillus species-based direct-fed microbial on growth performance, nutrient digestibility, blood profile, and gut health in nursery pigs fed corn-soybean meal-based diets [J].
Cai, L. ;
Indrakumar, S. ;
Kiarie, E. ;
Kim, I. H. .
JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2015, 93 (09) :4336-4342
[10]  
Centraal Veevoederbureau (CVB), 2012, 50 CVB