Review and model-based analysis of factors influencing soil carbon sequestration under hybrid poplar

被引:43
作者
Garten, C. T., Jr. [1 ]
Wullschleger, S. D. [1 ]
Classen, A. T. [2 ]
机构
[1] Oak Ridge Natl Lab, Div Environm Sci, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 USA
[2] Univ Tennessee, Dept Ecol & Evolutionary Biol, Knoxville, TN 37996 USA
关键词
Bioenergy crops; Short-rotation woody crops; Tree plantations; Hybrid poplar; Soil carbon sequestration; SHORT-ROTATION COPPICE; FINE-ROOT DYNAMICS; NITROGEN-FERTILIZATION; POPULUS-DELTOIDES; LOBLOLLY-PINE; BIOMASS PRODUCTION; GLOBAL PATTERNS; WOODY CROPS; PLANTATIONS; COTTONWOOD;
D O I
10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.08.013
中图分类号
S2 [农业工程];
学科分类号
0828 ;
摘要
The potential for soil carbon (C) sequestration under short-rotation woody crops, like hybrid poplar (Populus spp.), is a significant uncertainty in our understanding of how managed tree plantations might be used to partially offset increasing atmospheric CO2 concentrations. Through development of a multi-compartment model, we reviewed information from studies on hybrid poplar and analyzed the potential impact of changes in plant traits and nitrogen (N) fertilization on soil C storage. For a hypothetical setting in the southeastern U.S.A., and starting from soils that are relatively depleted in organic matter (2.5 kg C m(-2)), the model predicted an increase in mineral soil C stocks (1.7 kg C m(-2)) over four 7-year rotations of hybrid poplar. However, at the end of the fourth rotation, both cumulative soil C gains and annual rates of soil C accrual (23-93 g C m(-2) yr(-1)) varied widely depending on fertilization rate, biomass yield, and rates of dead root decomposition (three factors that were examined in a factorial model-based experiment). Our analysis indicated that processes linked to genetically modifiable poplar traits (aboveground biomass production, belowground C allocation, root decomposition) are potential controls on soil C sequestration. Key measures of model performance were sensitive to how aboveground biomass production responded to N fertilization. Site specific properties that were independent of plant traits were also important to predicted soil C accumulation and point to possible genotype x site interactions that may explain contradictory data from both empirical and theoretical studies of C sequestration under hybrid poplar plantations. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:214 / 226
页数:13
相关论文
共 58 条
[1]   The significance of organic separates to carbon dynamics and its modelling in some cultivated soils [J].
Balesdent, J .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SOIL SCIENCE, 1996, 47 (04) :485-493
[2]   A latitudinal gradient in carbon turnover times in forest soils [J].
Bird, MI ;
Chivas, AR ;
Head, J .
NATURE, 1996, 381 (6578) :143-146
[3]   Energy Crops and Their Implications on Soil and Environment [J].
Blanco-Canqui, Humberto .
AGRONOMY JOURNAL, 2010, 102 (02) :403-419
[4]   A review of fine root dynamics in Populus plantations [J].
Block, RMA ;
Rees, KCJ ;
Knight, JD .
AGROFORESTRY SYSTEMS, 2006, 67 (01) :73-84
[5]   DECOMPOSITION OF ROOTS OF BLACK ALDER AND HYBRID POPLAR IN SHORT-ROTATION PLANTINGS - NITROGEN AND LIGNIN CONTROL [J].
CAMIRE, C ;
COTE, B ;
BRULOTTE, S .
PLANT AND SOIL, 1991, 138 (01) :123-132
[6]   Wood production potential in poplar plantations in Sweden [J].
Christersson, Lars .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2010, 34 (09) :1289-1299
[7]   Post-establishment fertilization of Minnesota hybrid poplar plantations [J].
Coleman, Mark ;
Tolsted, David ;
Nichols, Tom ;
Johnson, Wendell D. ;
Wene, Edward G. ;
Houghtaling, Tom .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2006, 30 (8-9) :740-749
[8]   Comparing soil carbon of short rotation poplar plantations with agricultural crops and woodlots in North Central United States [J].
Coleman, Mark D. ;
Isebrands, J. G. ;
Tolsted, David N. ;
Tolbert, Virginia R. .
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2004, 33 (Suppl 1) :S299-S308
[9]  
Coleman MD, 2004, SRS72 USDA FOR SERV
[10]   Survival and growth of 31 Populus clones in South Carolina [J].
Coyle, David R. ;
Coleman, Mark D. ;
Durant, Jaclin A. ;
Newman, Lee A. .
BIOMASS & BIOENERGY, 2006, 30 (8-9) :750-758