A novel risk evaluation method for fire and explosion accidents in oil depots using bow-tie analysis and risk matrix analysis method based on cloud model theory

被引:81
作者
Xie, Shuyi [1 ]
Dong, Shaohua [1 ]
Chen, Yinuo [1 ]
Peng, Yujie [1 ]
Li, Xincai [2 ]
机构
[1] China Univ Petr, Coll Safety & Ocean Engn, Beijing 102249, Peoples R China
[2] PetroChina Huabei Oilfield Co, Dev Dept Huabei Oilfield Co, Renqiu 062552, Peoples R China
基金
国家重点研发计划; 中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Fire and explosion accidents; Risk assessment; Cloud model; Group cloud decision-making; Delphi iteration process; FAULT-TREE ANALYSIS; GAS-PIPELINES; HIERARCHY PROCESS; EVENT TREE; LEAKAGE; INDUSTRIAL; FRAMEWORK; SELECTION; FAILURE; SCALE;
D O I
10.1016/j.ress.2021.107791
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Due to the catastrophic impact of Fire and Explosion Accidents in Oil Depots (FEAOD), the prevention and control of such accidents is the most critical part of risk management. In this study, a Bow-tie (BT) model was built for FEAOD, while a quantitative risk assessment and consequence assessment was performed in conjunction with the risk matrix. Then, due to the uncertainty and ambiguity of the probability data of Basic Events (BEs) during the expert elicitation process, this study creatively proposed a Cloud-Analytic Hierarchy Process (Cloud-AHP) algorithm and Group Cloud Decision-Making (GCDM) algorithm based on the Fuzzy Cloud Membership Function (FCMF). Finally, combined with the probability estimation algorithm and the sensitivity analysis, a novel risk quantitative assessment algorithm for a BT model was developed based on Cloud Model (CM) theory. The discretion, ambiguity, and randomness were considered during the evaluation process, and a more scientific assessment fusion result of Decision makers (DMs) was obtained, while the Delphi iteration process further reduced personal errors. A case study of an oil depot in Dalian was investigated. The results showed that the proposed method more accurately identified the weak links in the safety system, providing a theoretical basis for the risk prevention and control.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Thresholds for domino effects and safety distances in the process industry: A review of approaches and regulations [J].
Alileche, Nassim ;
Cozzani, Valerio ;
Reniers, Genserik ;
Estel, Lionel .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2015, 143 :74-84
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Collection of oil tanks accident analysis
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2008, PROCLAMATION NATL DE, V6, P181
[4]   Risk evaluation of oil and natural gas pipelines due to natural hazards using fuzzy fault tree analysis [J].
Badida, Pavanaditya ;
Balasubramaniam, Yakesh ;
Jayaprakash, Jayapriya .
JOURNAL OF NATURAL GAS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING, 2019, 66 :284-292
[5]  
Baker QA., 2019, LOSS PREVENT B, P269
[6]   Application of risk assessment and decision analysis to the evaluation, ranking and selection of environmental remediation alternatives [J].
Bonano, EJ ;
Apostolakis, GE ;
Salter, PF ;
Ghassemi, A ;
Jennings, S .
JOURNAL OF HAZARDOUS MATERIALS, 2000, 71 (1-3) :35-57
[7]   A combined multi-criteria approach to support FMECA analyses: A real-world case [J].
Carpitella, Silvia ;
Certa, Antonella ;
Izquierdo, Joaquin ;
La Fata, Concetta Manuela .
RELIABILITY ENGINEERING & SYSTEM SAFETY, 2018, 169 :394-402
[8]   China's regional sustainability assessment on mineral resources: Results from an improved analytic hierarchy process-based normal cloud model [J].
Cui, Chao-Qun ;
Wang, Bing ;
Zhao, Yi-Xin ;
Wang, Qian ;
Sun, Zhen-Ming .
JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2019, 210 :105-120
[9]  
Ding L, 2020, PROCESS SAF ENVIRON, V135, P282
[10]   Estimation of failure probability of oil and gas transmission pipelines by fuzzy fault tree analysis [J].
Ding, YH ;
Yu, DT .
JOURNAL OF LOSS PREVENTION IN THE PROCESS INDUSTRIES, 2005, 18 (02) :83-88