Chlorhexidine in Dentistry: Pharmacology, Uses, and Adverse Effects

被引:131
|
作者
Deus, Frank Poppolo [1 ]
Ouanounou, Aviv [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Toronto, Fac Dent, Toronto, ON, Canada
[2] Univ Toronto, Fac Dent, Dept Clin Sci Pharmacol & Prevent Dent, Toronto, ON, Canada
关键词
Chlorhexidine; Mechanism of action; Adverse effects; Dentistry; MOUTHWASH; GLUCONATE; EFFICACY; POCKET; PLAQUE; GEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.identj.2022.01.005
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Objectives: The aim of this work was to review the current uses of chlorhexidine (CHX) in dentistry based on its mechanism of action, whilst highlighting the most effective protocols that render the highest clinical efficacy whilst limiting adverse drug reactions. Methods: A literature search was conducted using the key words chlorhexidine, mechanism of action, adverse effects, and dentistry using databases in the University of Toronto library system. The titles and abstracts were read, and relevant articles were selected. Results: A total of 1100 publications were identified, 100 were investigated, and 67 of them were used. Out of the 67 selected articles, 12 were reviews on CHX; 5 articles focussed on CHX gels; 13 focussed on CHX mouthwashes; 8 focussed on CHX products; 13 discussed adverse effects associated with CHX; 13 focussed on periodontal pathology and treatment; 6 focussed on implant periodontal and dental surgeries; 7 evaluated effects on caries; 6 looked at the mechanisms of action; and 12 focussed on the antibacterial and antimicrobial impact on the oral biome. There were multiple areas of overlap amongst the articles, and results showed that CHX provides different uses, but mainly as an adjunct to various treatments. Mouthwash was the most superior medium when used in short time spans when mechanical prophylaxis was not possible for the prevention of gingivitis and maintenance of oral hygiene. CHX products are often used in periodontics, postoral surgical procedures, and as a prophylaxis for multiple invasive procedures with minimal adverse effects. Tooth staining was the most negative adverse effect reported by patients. Conclusions: CHX's antimicrobial properties make it an ideal prophylactic when mechanical debridement is not possible. CHX mouthwash appears to be more effective compared to gels. Concentrations of 0.12% to 0.2% are recommended; any mouthwash with concentrations above 0.2% will unnecessarily increase the unwanted side effects. CHX is useful amongst various areas of dentistry including oral surgery, periodontics, and even general dentistry. For long-term treatments, especially in periodontitis patients (stage I-III) undergoing nonsurgical treatments, CHX chips are recommended. CHX chips are also recommended as an adjunct to implant debridement in patients with peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis over CHX mouthwash and gels. (C) 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of FDI World Dental Federation.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 277
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [41] Comparing the effects of chlorhexidine and persica on alveolar bone healing following tooth extraction in rats, a randomised controlled trial
    Dorri, Mojtaba
    Shahrabi, Shokufeh
    Navabazam, Alireza
    CLINICAL ORAL INVESTIGATIONS, 2012, 16 (01) : 25 - 31
  • [42] Comparison of antibacterial effects of oral rinses chlorhexidine and herbal mouth wash in patients admitted to intensive care unit
    Baradari, A. G.
    Khezri, H. D.
    Arabi, S.
    BRATISLAVA MEDICAL JOURNAL-BRATISLAVSKE LEKARSKE LISTY, 2012, 113 (09): : 556 - 560
  • [43] Adverse effects of antiepileptic drugs
    Greenwood, RS
    EPILEPSIA, 2000, 41 : S42 - S52
  • [44] The influence of chlorhexidine on the antibacterial effects of MTA
    Mittag, Sven-Georg
    Eissner, Christof
    Zabel, Lutz
    Wrbas, Karl-Thomas
    Kielbassa, Andrej M.
    QUINTESSENCE INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 43 (10): : 901 - 906
  • [45] EFFECTS OF CHLORHEXIDINE ON HUMAN TASTE PERCEPTION
    HELMS, JA
    DELLAFERA, MA
    MOTT, AE
    FRANK, ME
    ARCHIVES OF ORAL BIOLOGY, 1995, 40 (10) : 913 - 920
  • [46] In vitro antimicrobial effects of chlorhexidine diacetate versus chlorhexidine free base dressings
    Holinga, George J.
    McGuire, James E.
    JOURNAL OF WOUND CARE, 2020, 29 (05) : S22 - S28
  • [47] Antimicrobial effects of the combination of chlorhexidine and xylitol
    Paula, V. A. C.
    Modesto, A.
    Santos, K. R. N.
    Gleiser, R.
    BRITISH DENTAL JOURNAL, 2010, 209 (12) : 1 - 5
  • [48] Comparable Effects of Polyhexanide and Chlorhexidine on Cell Viability of Primary Human Chondrocytes
    Roehner, Eric
    Perka, Carsten
    Andreas, Kristin
    Kielbassa, Andrej M.
    Matziolis, Georg
    Pischon, Nicole
    CYTOLOGIA, 2011, 76 (04) : 475 - 482
  • [49] A 5-Year retrospective analysis of adverse events in dentistry at the Dental Hospital, Faculty of Dentistry, Chulalongkorn University
    Siriwatana, Kiti
    Pongpanich, Sathirakorn
    BMC ORAL HEALTH, 2024, 24 (01):
  • [50] Cytotoxic effects of a chlorhexidine mouthwash and of an enzymatic mouthwash on human gingival fibroblasts
    Ana Sofia Coelho
    Mafalda Laranjo
    Ana Cristina Gonçalves
    Anabela Paula
    Siri Paulo
    Ana Margarida Abrantes
    Francisco Caramelo
    Manuel Marques Ferreira
    Mário Jorge Silva
    Eunice Carrilho
    Maria Filomena Botelho
    Odontology, 2020, 108 : 260 - 270