Clinical Validation of the INTERGROWTH-21st Standards of Fetal Abdominal Circumference for the Prediction of Small-for-Gestational-Age Neonates in Italy

被引:6
作者
Bellussi, Federica [1 ]
Cataneo, Ilaria [1 ]
Visentin, Silvia [2 ]
Simonazzi, Giuliana [1 ]
Lenzi, Jacopo [3 ]
Fantini, Maria Pia [3 ]
Mimmi, Stefano [4 ]
Cosmi, Erich [2 ]
Pilu, Gianluigi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Bologna, Italy
[2] Univ Padua, Maternal Fetal Med Unit, Dept Womans & Childs Hlth, Padua, Italy
[3] Univ Bologna, Dept Biomed & Neuromotor Sci, Bologna, Italy
[4] Univ Modena, Local Hlth Author, Modena, Italy
关键词
Abdominal circumference; Small for gestational age; INTERGROWTH-21st; Fetal growth restriction; BIRTH-WEIGHT STANDARDS; INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS; HEAD CIRCUMFERENCE; POPULATION; GROWTH; CURVES; LENGTH;
D O I
10.1159/000457121
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare the accuracy of the INTERGROWTH-21st (IG-21) with the Italian Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (SIEOG) abdominal circumference (AC) standards in the detection of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) fetuses in a high-risk population. Material and Methods: Our study included all pregnant patients with an increased risk of placental insufficiency that were seen in two Italian university hospitals between 2014 and 2015. The accuracy of IG-21 and SIEOG AC standards in the detection of SGA neo-nates was analyzed by means of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) at 4 gestational age intervals (24-27, 28-31, 32-35, > 35 weeks). Results: We enrolled 428 patients (278 Italians). There was no significant difference between the ROC-AUC of AC according to IG-21 and SIEOG standards for all birthweight thresholds and gestational intervals that were considered. The diagnostic per-formance was similar in Italian and non-Italian patients. The accuracy was, however, limited, with values of ROC-AUC ranging between 0.80 and 0.89. Conclusions: The IG-21 and SIEOG AC standards are interchangeable for the diagnosis of SGA fetuses. The diagnostic accuracy is, however, limited. We provide figures that can be used to stratify the probability that an infant will be SGA in an obstetric population at increased risk of growth restriction. (C) 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:198 / 203
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
[41]   Placental and Clinical Characteristics of Term Small-for-Gestational-Age Neonates: A Case-Control Study [J].
Chisholm, Karen M. ;
Folkins, Ann K. .
PEDIATRIC AND DEVELOPMENTAL PATHOLOGY, 2016, 19 (01) :37-46
[42]   Predictive possibility of the transverse cerebellar diameter to abdominal circumference ratio for small-for-gestational-age fetus suspected as a cause of maternal placental syndromes: a retrospective cohort study [J].
Shinohara, Satoshi ;
Okuda, Yasuhiko ;
Hirata, Shuji ;
Suzuki, Kohta .
HYPERTENSION IN PREGNANCY, 2020, 39 (02) :145-151
[43]   Detection rate of the Japan society of obstetrics and gynecology's definition of fetal growth restriction for predicting small-for-gestational-age neonates [J].
Wakimoto, Tetsu ;
Kunimoto, Saki ;
Yamamoto, Ryo ;
Sasahara, Jun ;
Ishii, Keisuke .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ULTRASONICS, 2025,
[44]   Isolated Abdominal Circumference < 5% or Estimated Fetal Weight 10 to 19% as Predictors of Small for Gestational Age Infants [J].
Turitz, Amy L. ;
Quant, Hayley ;
Schwartz, Nadav ;
Elovitz, Michal ;
Bastek, Jamie A. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PERINATOLOGY, 2014, 31 (06) :469-475
[45]   Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates: screening by maternal biochemical markers at 30-34 weeks [J].
Bakalis, S. ;
Gallo, D. M. ;
Mendez, O. ;
Poon, L. C. ;
Nicolaides, K. H. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 46 (02) :208-215
[46]   Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates: screening by biophysical and biochemical markers at 19-24 weeks [J].
Poon, L. C. ;
Lesmes, C. ;
Gallo, D. M. ;
Akolekar, R. ;
Nicolaides, K. H. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 46 (04) :437-445
[47]   Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates: screening by biophysical and biochemical markers at 30-34 weeks [J].
Bakalis, S. ;
Peeva, G. ;
Gonzalez, R. ;
Poon, L. C. ;
Nicolaides, K. H. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 46 (04) :446-451
[48]   Validation of Fetal Medicine Foundation competing-risks model for small-for-gestational-age neonate in early third trimester [J].
Dagklis, T. ;
Papastefanou, I. ;
Tsakiridis, I. ;
Sotiriadis, A. ;
Makrydimas, G. ;
Athanasiadis, A. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2024, 63 (04) :466-471
[49]   Prediction of small for gestational age neonates: screening by maternal factors, fetal biometry, and biomarkers at 35-37 weeks' gestation [J].
Ciobanu, Anca ;
Rouvali, Angeliki ;
Syngelaki, Argyro ;
Akolekar, Ranjit ;
Nicolaides, Kypros H. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2019, 220 (05) :486.e1-486.e11
[50]   Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates: screening by uterine artery Doppler and mean arterial pressure at 35-37 weeks [J].
Fadigas, C. ;
Guerra, L. ;
Garcia-Tizon Larroca, S. ;
Poon, L. C. ;
Nicolaides, K. H. .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 45 (06) :715-721