Clinical Validation of the INTERGROWTH-21st Standards of Fetal Abdominal Circumference for the Prediction of Small-for-Gestational-Age Neonates in Italy

被引:6
|
作者
Bellussi, Federica [1 ]
Cataneo, Ilaria [1 ]
Visentin, Silvia [2 ]
Simonazzi, Giuliana [1 ]
Lenzi, Jacopo [3 ]
Fantini, Maria Pia [3 ]
Mimmi, Stefano [4 ]
Cosmi, Erich [2 ]
Pilu, Gianluigi [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bologna, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Bologna, Italy
[2] Univ Padua, Maternal Fetal Med Unit, Dept Womans & Childs Hlth, Padua, Italy
[3] Univ Bologna, Dept Biomed & Neuromotor Sci, Bologna, Italy
[4] Univ Modena, Local Hlth Author, Modena, Italy
关键词
Abdominal circumference; Small for gestational age; INTERGROWTH-21st; Fetal growth restriction; BIRTH-WEIGHT STANDARDS; INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS; HEAD CIRCUMFERENCE; POPULATION; GROWTH; CURVES; LENGTH;
D O I
10.1159/000457121
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Objectives: To compare the accuracy of the INTERGROWTH-21st (IG-21) with the Italian Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (SIEOG) abdominal circumference (AC) standards in the detection of small-for-gestational-age (SGA) fetuses in a high-risk population. Material and Methods: Our study included all pregnant patients with an increased risk of placental insufficiency that were seen in two Italian university hospitals between 2014 and 2015. The accuracy of IG-21 and SIEOG AC standards in the detection of SGA neo-nates was analyzed by means of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) at 4 gestational age intervals (24-27, 28-31, 32-35, > 35 weeks). Results: We enrolled 428 patients (278 Italians). There was no significant difference between the ROC-AUC of AC according to IG-21 and SIEOG standards for all birthweight thresholds and gestational intervals that were considered. The diagnostic per-formance was similar in Italian and non-Italian patients. The accuracy was, however, limited, with values of ROC-AUC ranging between 0.80 and 0.89. Conclusions: The IG-21 and SIEOG AC standards are interchangeable for the diagnosis of SGA fetuses. The diagnostic accuracy is, however, limited. We provide figures that can be used to stratify the probability that an infant will be SGA in an obstetric population at increased risk of growth restriction. (C) 2017 S. Karger AG, Basel
引用
收藏
页码:198 / 203
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Customized fetal growth standard compared with the INTERGROWTH-21st century standard at predicting small-for-gestational-age neonates
    Odibo, Anthony O.
    Nwabuobi, Chinedu
    Odibo, Linda
    Leavitt, Karla
    Obican, Sarah
    Tuuli, Methodius G.
    ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2018, 97 (11) : 1381 - 1387
  • [2] Performance of the INTERGROWTH-21st and World Health Organization fetal growth charts for the detection of small-for-gestational age neonates in Latin America
    Miranda, Jezid
    Maestre, Natalia
    Paternina-Caicedo, Angel
    Parra-Saavedra, Miguel
    Caradeux, Javier
    Sepulveda-Martinez, Alvaro
    Pelaez-Chomba, Melisa
    Torres, Andres
    Parra-Cordero, Mauro
    Diaz-Corvillon, Pilar
    Gallo, Dahiana M.
    Santacruz, Dario
    Rodriguez, Nicolas
    Sarmiento, Andres
    Benavides, Jesus A.
    Girado, Sergio
    Rojas-Suarez, Jose A.
    Gratacos, Eduard
    Figueras, Francesc
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2023, 161 (03) : 1083 - 1091
  • [3] Customized GROW vs INTERGROWTH-21st birthweight standards to identify small for gestational age associated perinatal outcomes at term
    Fay, Emily
    Hugh, Oliver
    Francis, Andre
    Katz, Ronit
    Sitcov, Kristin
    Souter, Vivienne
    Gardosi, Jason
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY MFM, 2022, 4 (02)
  • [4] Fetal abdominal circumference in the second trimester and prediction of small for gestational age at birth
    Doulaveris, Georgios
    Gallagher, Patience
    Romney, Elizabeth
    Richley, Michael
    Gebb, Juliana
    Rosner, Mara
    Dar, Pe'er
    JOURNAL OF MATERNAL-FETAL & NEONATAL MEDICINE, 2020, 33 (14) : 2415 - 2421
  • [5] Incidence of small for gestational age neonates, according to the Fenton and Intergrowth-21st curves in a level II maternity
    Barreto, Claudia Malisano
    Lambert Pereira, Marley Aparecida
    Boni Rolim, Anna Carolina
    Abbas, Samira Ali
    Langhi Junior, Dante Mario
    Nunes dos Santos, Amelia Miyashiro
    REVISTA PAULISTA DE PEDIATRIA, 2021, 39
  • [6] The INTERGROWTH-21st fetal growth standards: toward the global integration of pregnancy and pediatric care
    Papageorghiou, Aris T.
    Kennedy, Stephen H.
    Salomon, Laurent J.
    Altman, Douglas G.
    Ohuma, Eric O.
    Stones, William
    Gravett, Michael G.
    Barros, Fernando C.
    Victora, Cesar
    Purwar, Manorama
    Jaffer, Yasmin
    Noble, Julia A.
    Bertino, Enrico
    Pang, Ruyan
    Ismail, Leila Cheikh
    Lambert, Ann
    Bhutta, Zulfiqar A.
    Villar, Jose
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2018, 218 (02) : S630 - S640
  • [7] INTERGROWTH-21st standards for Hadlock's estimation of fetal weight
    Stirnemann, J.
    Salomon, L. J.
    Papageorghiou, A. T.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2020, 56 (06) : 946 - +
  • [8] International estimated fetal weight standards of the INTERGROWTH-21st Project
    Stirnemann, J.
    Villar, J.
    Salomon, L. J.
    Ohuma, E.
    Ruyan, P.
    Altman, D. G.
    Nosten, F.
    Craik, R.
    Munim, S.
    Ismail, L. Cheikh
    Barros, F. C.
    Lambert, A.
    Norris, S.
    Carvalho, M.
    Jaffer, Y. A.
    Noble, J. A.
    Bertino, E.
    Gravett, M. G.
    Purwar, M.
    Victora, C. G.
    Uauy, R.
    Bhutta, Z.
    Kennedy, S.
    Papageorghiou, A. T.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 49 (04) : 478 - 486
  • [9] Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates: screening by fetal biometry at 30-34 weeks
    Bakalis, S.
    Silva, M.
    Akolekar, R.
    Poon, L. C.
    Nicolaides, K. H.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 45 (05) : 551 - 558
  • [10] Prediction of small-for-gestational-age neonates: screening by fetal biometry at 35-37 weeks
    Fadigas, C.
    Saiid, Y.
    Gonzalez, R.
    Poon, L. C.
    Nicolaides, K. H.
    ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2015, 45 (05) : 559 - 565