Eulerian shape design sensitivity analysis and optimization with a fixed grid

被引:44
|
作者
Kim, NH [1 ]
Chang, YM [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Florida, Dept Mech & Aerosp Engn, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
关键词
shape optimization; topology optimization; boundary homogenization; design sensitivity analysis; fixed grid;
D O I
10.1016/j.cma.2004.12.019
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Conventional shape optimization based on the finite element method uses Lagrangian representation in which the finite element mesh moves according to shape change, while modern topology optimization uses Eulerian representation. In this paper, an approach to shape optimization using Eulerian representation such that the mesh distortion problem in the conventional approach can be resolved is proposed. A continuum geometric model is defined on the fixed grid of finite elements. An active set of finite elements that defines the discrete domain is determined using a procedure similar to topology optimization, in which each element has a unique shape density. The shape design parameter that is defined on the geometric model is transformed into the corresponding shape density variation of the boundary elements. Using this transformation, it has been shown that the shape design problem can be treated as a parameter design problem, which is a much easier method than the former. A detailed derivation of how the shape design velocity field can be converted into the shape density variation is presented along with sensitivity calculation. Very efficient sensitivity coefficients are calculated by integrating only those elements that belong to the structural boundary. The accuracy of the sensitivity information is compared with that derived by the finite difference method with excellent agreement. Two design optimization problems are presented to show the feasibility of the proposed design approach. (c) 2005 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:3291 / 3314
页数:24
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Sensitivity analysis for fixed-grid shape optimization by using oblique boundary curve approximation
    Jang, GW
    Kim, YY
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOLIDS AND STRUCTURES, 2005, 42 (11-12) : 3591 - 3609
  • [2] DESIGN SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS FOR SHAPE OPTIMIZATION BY THE BEM
    IVANOVA, J
    DINEVA, P
    VALEVA, V
    HADJIKOV, L
    ENGINEERING ANALYSIS WITH BOUNDARY ELEMENTS, 1991, 8 (05) : 218 - 223
  • [3] SHAPE DESIGN SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS AND OPTIMIZATION OF GENERAL SHAPE ARCHES
    KIM, IY
    KWAK, BM
    COMPUTERS & STRUCTURES, 1993, 48 (06) : 1025 - 1031
  • [4] Shape design sensitivity analysis and optimization for structural durability
    Chang, KH
    Yu, XM
    Choi, KK
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 1997, 40 (09) : 1719 - 1743
  • [5] DESIGN SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS AND OPTIMIZATION TOOL (DSO) FOR SHAPE DESIGN APPLICATIONS
    CHANG, KH
    CHOI, KK
    TSAI, CS
    CHEN, CJ
    CHOI, BS
    YU, XM
    COMPUTING SYSTEMS IN ENGINEERING, 1995, 6 (02): : 151 - 175
  • [6] SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS IN SHAPE OPTIMIZATION DESIGN FOR A PRESSURE-VESSEL
    LI, YS
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSELS AND PIPING, 1992, 49 (03) : 387 - 397
  • [7] SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS IN SHAPE OPTIMIZATION DESIGN FOR PRESSURE-VESSEL
    YOUNSHENG, L
    JI, L
    JOURNAL OF PRESSURE VESSEL TECHNOLOGY-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1992, 114 (04): : 428 - 432
  • [8] Unification of parametric and implicit methods for shape sensitivity analysis and optimization with fixed mesh
    Zhang, Weihong
    Huang, Qiangqiang
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR NUMERICAL METHODS IN ENGINEERING, 2017, 109 (03) : 326 - 344
  • [9] Design sensitivity analysis for shape optimization based on the Lie derivative
    Kuci, Erin
    Henrotte, Francois
    Duysinx, Pierre
    Geuzaine, Christophe
    COMPUTER METHODS IN APPLIED MECHANICS AND ENGINEERING, 2017, 317 : 702 - 722
  • [10] Design Sensitivity Analysis for Shape Optimization of Nonlinear Magnetostatic Systems
    Kuci, Erin
    Henrotte, Francois
    Duysinx, Pierre
    Dular, Patrick
    Geuzaine, Christophe
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 2016, 52 (03)