Quality of life assessment of implant-retained overdentures and fixed metal-acrylic resin prostheses in patients with marginal mandibulectomy

被引:18
作者
Karayazgan-Saracoglu, Banu [1 ]
Atay, Arzu [2 ]
Korkmaz, Cumhur [2 ]
Gunay, Yumushan [2 ]
机构
[1] Okan Univ, Dept Prosthodont, Fac Dent, Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Gulhane Mil Med Acad, Haydarpasa Training Hosp, Dept Prosthodont, Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
SQUAMOUS-CELL CARCINOMA; NECK-CANCER PATIENTS; LEAST; 5; YEARS; DENTAL IMPLANTS; ORAL-CANCER; SAGITTAL MANDIBULECTOMY; EDENTULOUS PATIENTS; COMPLICATION RATES; OBSERVATION PERIOD; ABLATIVE SURGERY;
D O I
10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.01.025
中图分类号
R78 [口腔科学];
学科分类号
1003 ;
摘要
Statement of problem. Several factors affect the prosthetic outcome of patients with mandibular defects. However, it is questionable whether fixed or removable implant-supported prostheses meet the expectations and satisfaction of the patients. The perspectives of these patients are important in managing the prosthetic treatment strategies. Purpose. The purpose of this prospective clinical study was to evaluate the satisfaction and oral health-related quality of life of patients with marginal mandibulectomies with implant-retained overdentures and fixed metal-acrylic resin prostheses. Material and methods. Twenty-two participants with marginal mandibulectomies were included in the study. They completed an oral health impact profile questionnaire designed for patients with edentulism (OHIP-Edent) for the assessment of quality of life and visual analog scales (VASs) to validate their general satisfaction before treatment. Ten participants received 4 implant-retained fixed metal-acrylic resin prostheses, whereas 12 participants were treated with 2 implant supported overdentures. Six months after delivery of their prostheses, the participants completed the OHIP-Edent questionnaire and VAS again. For the statistical analyses, Student t tests together with descriptive statistics (mean, standard deviation, frequency) were used in the 2 intergroup parameter comparisons that showed normal distribution. The Mann-Whitney U test and Kruskal-Wallis test were used for intergroup comparisons, and the Wilcoxon signed rank test was used for intragroup comparisons. Results. Compared with pretreatment mean values, a statistically significant (P <.05) decrease in mean scores of all OHIP-Edent values and an increase in VAS scores were found in both groups. After patients were treated, their OHIP-Edent values in the group with an overdenture prosthesis were higher than those in the group with a fixed metal-acrylic resin prosthesis (P <.05). Conclusions. These results demonstrate that implant-retained overdentures and fixed metal-acrylic resin prostheses provide better function and, thus, oral health-related quality of life for patients with marginal mandibulectomies.
引用
收藏
页码:551 / 560
页数:10
相关论文
共 71 条
  • [1] Relationships between perceived chewing ability, objective masticatory function and oral health-related quality of life in mandibulectomy or glossectomy patients with a dento-maxillary prosthesis
    Aimaijiang, Yiliyaer
    Otomaru, Takafumi
    Taniguchi, Hisashi
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHODONTIC RESEARCH, 2016, 60 (02) : 92 - 97
  • [2] Allen F, 2002, INT J PROSTHODONT, V15, P446
  • [3] Fracture of the anterior segment of the atrophic mandible related to dental implants
    Almasri, M.
    El-Hakim, M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ORAL AND MAXILLOFACIAL SURGERY, 2012, 41 (05) : 646 - 649
  • [4] Evaluation of cement-retained versus screw-retained implant-supported restorations for marginal bone loss: A systematic review and meta-analysis
    Araujo Lemos, Cleidiel Aparecido
    de Souza Batista, Victor Eduardo
    de Faria Almeida, Daniel Augusto
    Santiago Junior, Joel Ferreira
    Verri, Fellippo Ramos
    Pellizzer, Eduardo Piza
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PROSTHETIC DENTISTRY, 2016, 115 (04) : 419 - 427
  • [5] Bangers BS, 2015, J CLIN DIAGN RES, V9, P12
  • [6] Oral rehabilitation with dental implants after cancer treatment
    Barrowman, R. A.
    Wilson, P. R.
    Wiesenfeld, D.
    [J]. AUSTRALIAN DENTAL JOURNAL, 2011, 56 (02) : 160 - 165
  • [7] MANDIBLE PRESERVATION WITH ORAL CAVITY CARCINOMA - RIM MANDIBULECTOMY VERSUS SAGITTAL MANDIBULECTOMY
    BARTTELBORT, SW
    ARIYAN, S
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1993, 166 (04) : 411 - 415
  • [8] Bhat Srinidhi, 2016, J Indian Prosthodont Soc, V16, P182, DOI 10.4103/0972-4052.176522
  • [9] Bozini T, 2011, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V26, P304
  • [10] Brennan M, 2010, INT J ORAL MAX IMPL, V25, P791