Mitigation of Acute Hydrogen Sulfide and Ammonia Emissions from Swine Manure during Three-Hour Agitation Using Pelletized Biochar

被引:10
作者
Chen, Baitong [1 ]
Koziel, Jacek A. [1 ]
Lee, Myeongseong [1 ]
O'Brien, Samuel C. [1 ]
Li, Peiyang [1 ]
Brown, Robert C. [2 ]
机构
[1] Iowa State Univ, Dept Agr & Biosyst Engn, Ames, IA 50011 USA
[2] Iowa State Univ, Bioecon Inst, Dept Mech Engn, Ames, IA 50011 USA
关键词
agricultural wastewater treatment; hazardous waste management; gas-liquid interface; gaseous emissions; animal production; occupational safety; STORAGE; WORKERS; OXIDE; ODOR; GAS;
D O I
10.3390/atmos12070825
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The risk of inhalation exposure to elevated concentrations of hydrogen sulfide (H2S) and ammonia (NH3) during the agitation of stored swine manure is high. Once or twice a year, farmers agitate manure before pump-out and application to fields. Agitation of the swine manure causes the short-term releases of highly toxic levels of H2S and NH3. In our previous pilot-scale studies, the biochar powder showed significant mitigation of H2S and NH3 emissions when it was surficially applied to manure immediately before agitation. However, fine biochar powder application poses hazards by itself and may not be practical to apply on a farm scale, especially when livestock and workers are present. We hypothesized that applying pelletized biochar to manure surfaces is just as effective as applying powder to protect farmers and animals from excessive exposure to H2S and NH3. This work reports on the lab-scale proof-of-the-concept trials with biochar pellets on the lab scale. The objective was to compare the biochar pellets and biochar powder on their effectiveness of mitigation on H2S and NH3 gases during 3-h-long swine manure agitation. Three scenarios were compared in (n = 3) trials: (i) control, (ii) 12.5 mm thick surficial application to manure surface of biochar powder, and (iii) an equivalent (by mass) dose of pelletized biochar applied to the manure surface. The biochar powder was bound with 35% (wt) water into similar to 5 x 10 mm (dia x length) pellets. The biochar powder was significantly (p < 0.05) more effective than the biochar pellets. Still, pellets reduced total H2S and NH3 emissions by similar to 72% and similar to 68%, respectively (p = 0.001), compared with similar to 99% by powder (p = 0.001). The maximum H2S and NH3 concentrations were reduced from 48.1 +/- 4.8 ppm and 1810 +/- 850 ppm to 20.8 +/- 2.95 ppm and 775 +/- 182 ppm by pellets, and to 22.1 +/- 16.9 ppm and 40.3 +/- 57 ppm by powder, respectively. These reductions are equivalent to reducing the maximum concentrations of H2S and NH3 during the 3-h manure agitation by 57% and 57% (pellets) and 54% and 98% (powder), respectively. Treated manure properties hinted at improved nitrogen retention, yet they were not significant due to high variability. We recommend scaling up and trials on the farm-scale level using biochar pellets to assess the feasibility of application to large manure surfaces and techno-economic evaluation.
引用
收藏
页数:14
相关论文
共 12 条
  • [1] Mitigation of Acute Ammonia Emissions With Biochar During Swine Manure Agitation Before Pump-Out: Proof-of-the-Concept
    Chen, Baitong
    Koziel, Jacek A.
    Bialowiec, Andrzej
    Lee, Myeongseong
    Ma, Hantian
    O'Brien, Samuel
    Li, Peiyang
    Meiirkhanuly, Zhanibek
    Brown, Robert C.
    FRONTIERS IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE, 2021, 9
  • [2] Pilot-scale testing of renewable biocatalyst for swine manure treatment and mitigation of odorous VOCs, ammonia and hydrogen sulfide emissions
    Maurer, Devin L.
    Koziel, Jacek A.
    Bruning, Kelsey
    Parker, David B.
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 150 : 313 - 321
  • [3] Emissions of ammonia, carbon dioxide, and hydrogen sulfide from swine wastewater during and after acidification treatment: Effect of pH, mixing and aeration
    Dai, X. R.
    Blanes-Vidal, V.
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2013, 115 : 147 - 154
  • [4] Farm-scale testing of soybean peroxidase and calcium peroxide for surficial swine manure treatment and mitigation of odorous VOCs, ammonia and hydrogen sulfide emissions
    Maurer, Devin L.
    Koziel, Jacek A.
    Bruning, Kelsey
    Parker, David B.
    ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2017, 166 : 467 - 478
  • [5] Ammonia and hydrogen sulfide emissions from swine production facilities in North America: A meta-analysis
    Liu, Z.
    Powers, W.
    Murphy, J.
    Maghirang, R.
    JOURNAL OF ANIMAL SCIENCE, 2014, 92 (04) : 1656 - 1665
  • [6] Effects of Treated Manure Conditions on Ammonia and Hydrogen Sulfide Emissions from a Swine Finishing Barn Equipped with Semicontinuous Pit Recharge System in Summer
    Wi, Jisoo
    Lee, Seunghun
    Kim, Eunjong
    Lee, Myeongseong
    Koziel, Jacek A.
    Ahn, Heekwon
    ATMOSPHERE, 2020, 11 (07)
  • [7] SIMULATION OF HYDROGEN SULFIDE EMISSION FROM DEEP-PIT MANURE STORAGE DURING AGITATION
    Lin, H.
    Liu, W.
    Gan, J.
    Wang, Y.
    Hu, B.
    TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASABE, 2018, 61 (06) : 1951 - 1967
  • [8] The Impact of Surficial Biochar Treatment on Acute H2S Emissions during Swine Manure Agitation before Pump-Out: Proof-of-the-Concept
    Chen, Baitong
    Koziel, Jacek A.
    Bialowiec, Andrzej
    Lee, Myeongseong
    Ma, Hantian
    Li, Peiyang
    Meiirkhanuly, Zhanibek
    Brown, Robert C.
    CATALYSTS, 2020, 10 (08)
  • [9] ODOR, AMMONIA, AND HYDROGEN SULFIDE CONCENTRATION AND EMISSIONS FROM TWO FARROWING-GESTATION SWINE OPERATIONS IN NORTH DAKOTA
    Rahman, S.
    Newman, D.
    APPLIED ENGINEERING IN AGRICULTURE, 2012, 28 (01) : 107 - 115
  • [10] Field evaluation of wood bark-based down-flow biofilters for mitigation of odor, ammonia, and hydrogen sulfide emissions from confined swine nursery barns
    Kafle, Gopi Krishna
    Chen, Lide
    Neibling, Howard
    He, B. Brian
    JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2015, 147 : 164 - 174