Digital Hardware for Peer Assessment in K-12 Schools and Universities

被引:3
作者
Topping, Keith James [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Dundee, Sch Educ, Dundee, Scotland
关键词
peer assessment; digital; primary school; secondary school; university; HIGHER-EDUCATION; ONLINE; METAANALYSIS; FEEDBACK; IMPACT;
D O I
10.3389/feduc.2021.666538
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Digital peer assessment (PA) is an arrangement for learners to consider and specify the level, value, or quality of a product or the performance of other equal-status learners, using computers, tablets, mobiles or other devices, and the internet. Digital PA is of increasing relevance as more educational establishments are moving toward online or blended learning. It has been widely used for some time, not only in elementary (primary) and high (secondary) schools but also in higher education. In this article, the purposes of PA are considered. Then, questions of effectiveness are briefly discussed. Then, the majority of the article describes in general terms how to do it. A review is offered for variations in types of PA and the underpinning theory, both of which have practical implications, irrespective of whether the PA is digital or face-to-face. Then, the use of different kinds of digital hardware in different kinds of PA will be considered. After this, the social and emotional aspects of digital PA are considered. As the contexts are so different, differences between primary school, high school, and higher education are reviewed. A conclusion summarises the strengths and weaknesses of digital PA, which can certainly be effective as a teaching and learning method and enhance student communication, problem-solving, and self-confidence.</p>
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 31 条
  • [1] Development of mathematics trainee teachers' knowledge while creating a MOOC
    Anat, Klemer
    Einav, Keisar
    Shirley, Rapoport
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL EDUCATION IN SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2020, 51 (06) : 939 - 953
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1926, The language and thought of the child
  • [3] Examining the effect of class size on classroom engagement and teacher-pupil interaction: Differences in relation to pupil prior attainment and primary vs. secondary schools
    Blatchford, Peter
    Bassett, Paul
    Brown, Penelope
    [J]. LEARNING AND INSTRUCTION, 2011, 21 (06) : 715 - 730
  • [4] Castle S.R., 2010, INT ED STUDIES, V3, P36, DOI [DOI 10.5539/IES.V3N3P36, 10.5539/ies.v3n3p36]
  • [5] Cheng KH, 2012, AUSTRALAS J EDUC TEC, V28, P599
  • [6] A POWER PRIMER
    COHEN, J
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1992, 112 (01) : 155 - 159
  • [7] A comparative analysis of the consistency and difference among online self-, peer-, external- and instructor-assessments: The competitive effect
    Dominguez, Cesar
    Jaime, Arturo
    Sanchez, Ana
    Blanco, Jose Miguel
    Heras, Jonathan
    [J]. COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2016, 60 : 112 - 120
  • [8] The Impact of Peer Assessment on Academic Performance: A Meta-analysis of Control Group Studies
    Double, Kit S.
    McGrane, Joshua A.
    Hopfenbeck, Therese N.
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY REVIEW, 2020, 32 (02) : 481 - 509
  • [9] Falchikov N, 2000, REV EDUC RES, V70, P287, DOI 10.2307/1170785
  • [10] An inventory of peer assessment diversity
    Gielen, Sarah
    Dochy, Filip
    Onghena, Patrick
    [J]. ASSESSMENT & EVALUATION IN HIGHER EDUCATION, 2011, 36 (02) : 137 - 155