Does digital mammography in a decentralized breast cancer screening program lead to screening performance parameters comparable with film-screen mammography?

被引:15
作者
Van Ongeval, Chantal [1 ]
Van Steen, Andre [1 ]
Putte, Gretel Vande [2 ]
Zanca, Federica [1 ]
Bosmans, Hilde [1 ]
Marchal, Guy [1 ]
Van Limbergen, Erik [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Hosp Leuven, Dept Radiol, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
[2] Leuven Univ Ctr Canc Prevent LUCK, B-3000 Louvain, Belgium
关键词
Digital imaging; Mammography; Breast cancer; Screening; Recall rate; QUALITY-ASSURANCE;
D O I
10.1007/s00330-010-1807-6
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
To evaluate if the screening performance parameters of digital mammography (DM) in a decentralized screening organization were comparable with film-screen mammography (FSM). A nationwide screening program was launched in 2001, and since 2005 screening with DM has been allowed. Firstly, the parameters of the three regional screening units (RSUs) that first switched to DM (11,355 women) were compared with the FSM period of the same three RSUs (23,325 women). Secondly, they were compared with the results of the whole central breast unit (CBU). The recall rate (RR) of the DM group in the initial round was 2.64% [2.40% for FSM (p = 0.43)] and in the subsequent round 1.20% [1.58% for FSM (p = 0.03)]. The cancer detection rate (CDR) was 0.59% for DM and 0.64% for FSM (p = 0.56). The percentage of ductal carcinoma in situ was 0.07% for DM and 0.16% for FSM (p = 0.02). The positive predictive value was high in the subsequent rounds (DM 48.00%, FSM 45.93%) and lower in the initial round (DM 24.05%, FSM 24.86%). Compared with the results of the whole CBU, DM showed no significant difference. DM can be introduced in a decentralized screening organization with a high CDR without increasing the RR.
引用
收藏
页码:2307 / 2314
页数:8
相关论文
共 22 条
[1]   Image quality measurements and metrics in full field digital mammography: An overview [J].
Bosmans, H ;
Carton, AK ;
Rogge, F ;
Zanca, F ;
Jacobs, J ;
Van Ongeval, C ;
Nijs, K ;
Van Steen, A ;
Marchal, G .
RADIATION PROTECTION DOSIMETRY, 2005, 117 (1-3) :120-130
[2]   Full-field digital versus screen-film mammography: Comparative accuracy in concurrent screening cohorts [J].
Del Turco, Marco Rosselli ;
Mantellini, Paola ;
Ciatto, Stefano ;
Bonardi, Rita ;
Martinelli, Francesca ;
Lazzari, Barbara ;
Houssami, Nehmat .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 2007, 189 (04) :860-866
[3]   Preliminary validation of a new variable pattern for daily quality assurance of medical image display devices [J].
Jacobs, Jurgen ;
Rogge, Frank ;
Kotre, John ;
Marchal, Guy ;
Bosmans, Hilde .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2007, 34 (07) :2744-2758
[4]   Breast Cancer Screening Results 5 Years after Introduction of Digital Mammography in a Population-based Screening Program [J].
Karssemeijer, Nico ;
Bluekens, Adriana M. ;
Beijerinck, David ;
Deurenberg, Jan J. ;
Beekman, Matthijs ;
Visser, Roelant ;
van Engen, Ruben ;
Bartels-Kortland, Annemieke ;
Broeders, Mireille J. .
RADIOLOGY, 2009, 253 (02) :353-358
[5]   Interval cancers in the beginning years of the breast cancer screening programme in the Belgian province of Limburg [J].
Kellen, E. ;
Putte, G. Vande ;
Van Steen, A. ;
Cloes, E. ;
Lousbergh, D. ;
Buntinx, F. ;
Van Limbergen, E. .
ACTA CLINICA BELGICA, 2008, 63 (03) :179-184
[6]   Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection: Results of 4,945 paired examinations [J].
Lewin, JM ;
Hendrick, RE ;
D'Orsi, CJ ;
Isaacs, PK ;
Moss, LJ ;
Karellas, A ;
Sisney, GA ;
Kuni, CC ;
Cutter, GR .
RADIOLOGY, 2001, 218 (03) :873-880
[7]   Effect of recall rate on earlier screen detection of breast cancers based on the dutch performance indicators [J].
Otten, JDM ;
Karssemeijer, N ;
Hendriks, JHCL ;
Groenewoud, JH ;
Fracheboud, J ;
Verbeek, ALM ;
de Koning, HJ ;
Holland, R .
JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2005, 97 (10) :748-754
[8]   European guidelines for quality assurance in breast cancer screening and diagnosis.: Fourth edition -: summary document [J].
Perry, N. ;
Broeders, M. ;
de Wolf, C. ;
Tornberg, S. ;
Holland, R. ;
von Karsa, L. .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 2008, 19 (04) :614-622
[9]   Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening [J].
Pisano, ED ;
Gatsonis, C ;
Hendrick, E ;
Yaffe, M ;
Baum, JK ;
Acharyya, S ;
Conant, EF ;
Fajardo, LL ;
Bassett, L ;
D'Orsi, C ;
Jong, R ;
Rebner, M .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2005, 353 (17) :1773-1783
[10]   Screen-film mammography versus full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading: Randomized trial in a population-based screening program - The Oslo II study [J].
Skaane, P ;
Skjennald, A .
RADIOLOGY, 2004, 232 (01) :197-204