Same-day discharge is feasible and safe in patients undergoing minimally invasive staging for gynecologic malignancies

被引:68
作者
Penner, Kristine R. [1 ,2 ]
Fleming, Nicole D. [4 ]
Barlavi, Leah [3 ]
Axtell, Allison E. [3 ]
Lentz, Scott E. [3 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Div Gynecol Oncol, Dept Obstet, Med Ctr, Orange, CA USA
[2] Univ Calif Irvine, Dept Gynecol, Med Ctr, Orange, CA USA
[3] Kaiser Permanente, Los Angeles Med Ctr, Los Angeles, CA 90027 USA
[4] Univ Texas MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Gynecol Oncol, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
cervical cancer; endometrial cancer; laparoscopic staging; minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging; robotic-assisted laparoscopic staging; same-day discharge; LAPAROSCOPIC HYSTERECTOMY; ENDOMETRIAL CANCER; RADICAL HYSTERECTOMY; CERVICAL-CANCER; SURGERY; OUTCOMES;
D O I
10.1016/j.ajog.2014.08.010
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to evaluate the feasibility and safety of same-day discharge of patients undergoing minimally invasive comprehensive surgical staging for endometrial and cervical cancer. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective review of consecutive patients from January 2008 to December 2011 undergoing comprehensive staging for endometrial or cervical cancer by traditional laparoscopy or robotic-assisted laparoscopy and intended for same-day discharge. Patients accomplishing same-day discharge were compared with those who required admission. Clinical and demographic data, perioperative outcomes, and postoperative patient contacts within 6 weeks were collected. Multivariate logistic regression modeling was used to determine factors associated with admission and unscheduled patient contacts within 2 weeks of surgery. RESULTS: A total of 141 patients were identified. One hundred eighteen patients (83.7%) underwent same-day discharge and 23 (16.3%) required overnight admission. The variables that significantly predicted overnight admission were severe pain in the postanesthesia care unit (odds ratio [OR], 6.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.74-26.6; P = .006), delayed ability to tolerate oral intake (OR, 9.3; 95% CI, 2.25-38.6, P = .002), traditional laparoscopic vs roboticassisted surgical approach (OR, 9.05; 95% CI, 2.34-35.1; P = .001), and surgery start time at 2: 00 PM or later (OR, 36.8; 95% CI, 6.19-219.3; P < .0001). There was no difference in the readmission rate between patients undergoing same-day discharge compared with overnight admission (11% vs 17%, P = .48). No variables significantly predicted unscheduled patient contact within 2 weeks of surgery at P < .01. CONCLUSION: Same-day discharge for patients undergoing laparoscopic or robotic-assisted laparoscopic staging for endometrial or cervical cancer is feasible and safe. There are low complication rates and few readmissions or unscheduled patient contacts within 2 weeks of surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:186.e1 / 186.e8
页数:8
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2009, EOPIOID OPIOIDS OPIA
[2]   Surgical outcomes of robotic-assisted surgical staging for endometrial cancer are equivalent to traditional laparoscopic staging at a minimally invasive surgical center [J].
Cardenas-Goicoechea, Joel ;
Adams, Sarah ;
Bhat, Suneel B. ;
Randall, Thomas C. .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2010, 117 (02) :224-228
[3]   Why We (Usually) Don't Have to Worry About Multiple Comparisons [J].
Gelman, Andrew ;
Hill, Jennifer ;
Yajima, Masanao .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH ON EDUCATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS, 2012, 5 (02) :189-211
[4]   Feasibility of same-day discharge after laparoscopic surgery in gynecologic oncology [J].
Gien, Lilian T. ;
Kupets, Rachel ;
Covens, Allan .
GYNECOLOGIC ONCOLOGY, 2011, 121 (02) :339-343
[5]   The impact of robotics on practice management of endometrial cancer: transitioning from traditional surgery [J].
Hoekstra, Anna V. ;
Jairam-Thodla, Arati ;
Rademaker, Alfred ;
Singh, Diljeet K. ;
Buttin, Barbara M. ;
Lurain, John R. ;
Schink, Julian C. ;
Lowe, M. Patrick .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ROBOTICS AND COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY, 2009, 5 (04) :392-397
[6]   Nationwide Use of Laparoscopic Hysterectomy Compared With Abdominal and Vaginal Approaches [J].
Jacoby, Vanessa L. ;
Autry, Amy ;
Jacobson, Gavin ;
Domush, Robert ;
Nakagawa, Sanae ;
Jacoby, Alison .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2009, 114 (05) :1041-1048
[7]   Outcomes and Cost Comparisons After Introducing a Robotics Program for Endometrial Cancer Surgery [J].
Lau, Susie ;
Vaknin, Zvi ;
Ramana-Kumar, Agnihotram V. ;
Halliday, Darron ;
Franco, Eduardo L. ;
Gotlieb, Walter H. .
OBSTETRICS AND GYNECOLOGY, 2012, 119 (04) :717-724
[8]  
Medical Advisory Secretariat, 2010, Ont Health Technol Assess Ser, V10, P1
[9]   Outpatient laparoscopic hysterectomy in a rural ambulatory surgery center [J].
Morrison, JE ;
Jacobs, VR .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN ASSOCIATION OF GYNECOLOGIC LAPAROSCOPISTS, 2004, 11 (03) :359-364
[10]  
Nezhat FR, 2008, JSLS-J SOC LAPAROEND, V12, P227